This country needs more teachers with a protastant work ethic,
Which Protestants? The ones who built the pyramids? Or the one's who tried to destroy this knowledge? The ones who are deeply indebted to the yellow slant-eyed Protestants in "Communist" China? The ones who are stupid enough to be duped into sending their sons and daughters into battle for the benefit of someone else? The ones who rape, enslave, massacre or steal the wealth of anyone who invites them to dinner that doesn't look or pray like him? This whole notion of a "Protestant work ethic" is arrogant nonsense that has no sound historical foundation....as if the non-Protestant world were/are a bunch of lazy Neanderthals who were just waiting for their Protestant masters/teachers to come along to civilize them. Seriously...do a little research on the gifts or contributions to civilization. Isn't it remarkable how few of them were given to us by these hard-working Protestants? Now do a little research on war, genocide, slavery, disease, and you will find the Protestant right there near the top. I am no Protestant basher, I just don't think that any one race, ethnic group, religion, culture, or "ism", has a monopoly on hard work ethics, intelligence, or civility.
Lol....I had to get that out of the way before going back to the OLPC issue. Every time I see or hear this phrase "Protestant work ethic" or the oxymoronic "Judaeo-Christian" it gets under my skin.
All of the points being made here have a great deal of merit. But as someone who has taught students in both America and in India, I think that learning styles and environment is an overlooked variable in this discussion. The opponents of technology in the classroom would have us go back to a model that worked extremely well for a time and place that only exists in a few cases today. Those one room schools produced some of the greatest minds of America. But as the culture changed so did learning styles.
To teach a child you first have to be able to get their attention and keep their attention. Because of cultural and environmental factors the attention span of children can vary greatly. I found that those students who were exposed to a lot of technology had much shorter attention spans than those who were not exposed to any technology. However, I also found that those who were exposed to technology in moderation had longer attention spans and displayed an eagerness to explore beyond limits of the non-technology model. When a child's exposure to this technology is limited to observation without any interactivity, they find their non-technology learning environments boring.
I agree with the research which seems to indicate that too much exposure to this technology stunts our creativity and imagination. I see the results everyday, where not only my students, but even adults have difficulty conceptualizing abstract models or problems.
Most adults can't even sit through a 60 minute documentary. Most adults don't have the attention span and cognitive ability to grasp indepth news coverage from PBS News Hour. They turn to the 2 minute news snippets of the corporate networks.
We don't operate in a non-technology world, our children don't live in a non-technology world, why should we expect them to learn in a classroom devoid of this technology?
In our after school/weekend learning centers in the DR, we intend to utilize either these XO laptops that, as a policy of OLPC, must be freely-distributed to the children, or our own in-house desktop computers. The technology will supplement traditional instruction and tactile learning. It will not substitute for it. $189 would buy books or even a personal tutor for a few lessons, but we'll take our chances with a laptop, the hundred or so free open source learning software titles that are freely available, and a teacher that is trained in how to utilize them in conjunction with traditional classroom instruction.
I'll agree to disagree with you guys and focus my energy on getting the center up and running. You'll all be invited to come and visit when the doors open!