Free energy

Are there coles notes on this.......I don't want to sit through an hour and 40 minutes of u tube

here:
Andrea Rossi Energy Catalyzer - E-Cat Hoax
Cassandra's legacy: The end of the E-Cat story? Andrea Rossi loses supporters for his "cold fusion" device
and wiki here:
Energy Catalyzer - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Looks like utter nonsense again about cold fusion. Still no scientific independently verifiable proof.

mart1n said:

Main stream science has put down cold fusion from the very beginning.

Click to expand...

Just as in Anthropogenic Global Warming Main Stream Science hasn't rejected fusion, but Main Stream Media. Three Mile Island and Chernobyl gave the pols and their petro-pals the perfect excuse to scare the begeezis out of the hoi polloi regarding nuclear energy. Real physicists never doubted that the containment problem would eventually be solved.


As long as science is a fascist hand servant to populist pols and union thuggery, the solution will not arrive. Three Mile Island was due to a fat union seniority guy falling asleep with his belly covering his switches. Why weren't his switches automated? In order to keep a man in the loop, a sop to the unions. Why did Chernobyl fail? By definition, all design and construction in the Soviet Union was managed by government pets, not motivated engineers.


However, Rossi et al are only a sideshow. The world must wait for the realization of Tesla's brilliant strategy of harnessing the sun's energy through the constantly replenished plasma battery of the Van Allen belt.

pelaut said:

Just as in Anthropogenic Global Warming Main Stream Science hasn't rejected fusion, but Main Stream Media. Three Mile Island and Chernobyl gave the pols and their petro-pals the perfect excuse to scare the begeezis out of the hoi polloi regarding nuclear energy. Real physicists never doubted that the containment problem would eventually be solved.


As long as science is a fascist hand servant to populist pols and union thuggery, the solution will not arrive. Three Mile Island was due to a fat union seniority guy falling asleep with his belly covering his switches. Why weren't his switches automated? In order to keep a man in the loop, a sop to the unions. Why did Chernobyl fail? By definition, all design and construction in the Soviet Union was managed by government pets, not motivated engineers.


However, Rossi et al are only a sideshow. The world must wait for the realization of Tesla's brilliant strategy of harnessing the sun's energy through the constantly replenished plasma battery of the Van Allen belt.

Click to expand...

Personally I'm a big proponent of nuclear power plant as THE answer to our electrical problems. In a country that doesn't produce any oil this is exactly what we need. I would love to see one large nuclear power plant built in The DR, preferably right next to "Palacio Nacional". We can have the guys that run OMSA run it... Deudas, privilegios e ilegalidad en la OMSA - DiarioLibre.com

LENR and COLD FUSION are two separete things

mart1n said:

Here is two videos where NASA is working with cold fusion.
NASA | Abundant Clean/Green Energy - YouTube
NASA Admits LENR (Cold Fusion) Game Changer! - YouTube
As far as main stream science, there are still saying for one hundred years that it is impossible for a bubble bee to fly and at a last ditch effort to save face one university gave a reason for bubble bee flight. This is the science term might be difficult to understand it is called brute force.

Click to expand...

LENR and COLD FUSION are two different things and calling them the same will cause confusion.

LENR looks like a possible winner:

April 24, 2013 ? By Steven B. Krivit ?
Graham Hubler, an expert cited in CBS?s 2009 ?60 Minutes? program ?Cold Fusion Is Hot Again,? no longer believes that cold fusion is real.
Hubler now makes a key distinction between ?cold fusion? and the real anomalous heat and nuclear effects seen in LENRs (low-energy nuclear reactions).
The distinction separates LENRs as legitimate science from the hypothesis of ?cold fusion,? which lacks scientific support.
The lack of this distinction is one of the fundamental reasons why ?cold fusion? is the most controversial subject in science in the past 100 years. It is the primary reason for the stigma in the field, the lack of funding and difficulties with the patent office.
New Energy Times first reported this crucial distinction four years ago beginning with our 2008 article ?It Doesn?t Look Like Fusion.? We followed this with public conference presentations, published encyclopedia chapters, and the 2010 special report ?Cold Fusion Is Neither.?

pelaut said:

Just as in Anthropogenic Global Warming Main Stream Science hasn't rejected fusion, but Main Stream Media. Three Mile Island and Chernobyl gave the pols and their petro-pals the perfect excuse to scare the begeezis out of the hoi polloi regarding nuclear energy. Real physicists never doubted that the containment problem would eventually be solved.

As long as science is a fascist hand servant to populist pols and union thuggery, the solution will not arrive. Three Mile Island was due to a fat union seniority guy falling asleep with his belly covering his switches. Why weren't his switches automated? In order to keep a man in the loop, a sop to the unions. Why did Chernobyl fail? By definition, all design and construction in the Soviet Union was managed by government pets, not motivated engineers.


However, Rossi et al are only a sideshow. The world must wait for the realization of Tesla's brilliant strategy of harnessing the sun's energy through the constantly replenished plasma battery of the Van Allen belt.

Click to expand...

I don't mean to get off topic, but are you saying that the Main Stream Media has rejected Anthropogenic Global Warming?

What has this to do with the DR.
I saw zero in video's

Closed