Protest all over the world against the discrimating decision of the DR Supreme Courts

iluvdr

New member
Aug 24, 2004
362
2
0
PRESS RELEASE - New-York October 17th: Haitian Diaspora Announce Protest at Dominican Consulate against the court decision that stripped Million of Dominican of their CitizenshipBROOKLYN, NEW YORK? The Haitian Diaspora for Civic and Human Rights (HDRHR) in coalition with other civic organizations invites countless concerned citizens of all nations, to join us on October 17th for a huge protest in front of the Dominican Republic Consulate located at 1501 Broadway Ave, New York, NY. The rally will start at 2 pm until 6pm.

HDCHR et al will unequivocally demand to rescind the 168/13 ruling of September 23rd 2013 from the Dominican's Highest Court annulling the citizenship of half a million of Dominicans of Haitian decent including other ethnic groups, if they were not born before 1929 in the land.

This decision is an unashamed infringement of all international engagements of the Dominican Republic in violating the human rights and dignity of its population. It is also a

potential anthropological and civil genocide setting the ground for an eventual ethnic cleansing case on the Hispaniola Island.

As a reminder, in October 1937 height (8) years before the Jewish holocaust by Adolph Hitler, President General Rafael Leonidas Trujillo Y Molina has massacred 20 to 30,000 Haitians living in the borderlands of Dominican Republic. Historians label such massacre as The Parsley Massacre. Today, our generations have a moral obligation to stand against the current xenophobic ruling by the Highest Court. We fully support our Dominican brothers and sisters to prevent the power-brokers from recidivating another massacre, this time not by machetes but by their racist law.

Trujillo did it in 1937!

We must stop it from happening again in 2013

NO to civic genocide!

Yes to Human Rights!
 

bob saunders

Platinum
Jan 1, 2002
32,571
5,998
113
dr1.com
PRESS RELEASE - New-York October 17th: Haitian Diaspora Announce Protest at Dominican Consulate against the court decision that stripped Million of Dominican of their CitizenshipBROOKLYN, NEW YORK– The Haitian Diaspora for Civic and Human Rights (HDRHR) in coalition with other civic organizations invites countless concerned citizens of all nations, to join us on October 17th for a huge protest in front of the Dominican Republic Consulate located at 1501 Broadway Ave, New York, NY. The rally will start at 2 pm until 6pm.

HDCHR et al will unequivocally demand to rescind the 168/13 ruling of September 23rd 2013 from the Dominican's Highest Court annulling the citizenship of half a million of Dominicans of Haitian decent including other ethnic groups, if they were not born before 1929 in the land.

This decision is an unashamed infringement of all international engagements of the Dominican Republic in violating the human rights and dignity of its population. It is also a

potential anthropological and civil genocide setting the ground for an eventual ethnic cleansing case on the Hispaniola Island.

As a reminder, in October 1937 height (8) years before the Jewish holocaust by Adolph Hitler, President General Rafael Leonidas Trujillo Y Molina has massacred 20 to 30,000 Haitians living in the borderlands of Dominican Republic. Historians label such massacre as The Parsley Massacre. Today, our generations have a moral obligation to stand against the current xenophobic ruling by the Highest Court. We fully support our Dominican brothers and sisters to prevent the power-brokers from recidivating another massacre, this time not by machetes but by their racist law.

Trujillo did it in 1937!

We must stop it from happening again in 2013

NO to civic genocide!

Yes to Human Rights!

Troll
 

bronzeallspice

Live everyday like it's your last
Mar 26, 2012
11,009
2
38
Wow! What a shame! This is what the Haitian diaspora should be doing in front of the White House, marching, rallying pleading for the UN to help them liberate Haiti from their corrupt leaders.
 

Hernandez

Banned
Feb 9, 2009
875
20
0
All over the world? Are you sure? In most countries people have no idea where Dominican Republic is.
 

iluvdr

New member
Aug 24, 2004
362
2
0
October 12, 2013 - 07:05

By Ricardo Rojas

LA ROMANA, Dominican Republic (Reuters) - For four generations Banesa Blemi's family, descendants of Haitian immigrants, put down roots as low-wage sugar cane cutters in their adopted homeland, and came to consider themselves Dominicans.

Then, last month the country's Constitutional Court issued a decision effectively denationalizing Blemi and her family, along with an estimated 250,000 fellow immigrants born after 1929.

"I have no country. What will become of me?" said Blemi, 27, standing with relatives outside the family's wooden shack near La Romana, the heart of the Dominican Republic's sugar cane industry and one of the Caribbean's top tourist resorts.

"We are Dominicans - we have never been to Haiti. We were born and raised here. We don't even speak Creole," she said, referring to Haiti's native tongue.

The September 23 court ruling retroactively denies Dominican nationality to anyone born after 1929 who does not have at least one parent of Dominican blood, under a constitutional clause declaring all others to be either in the country illegally or "in transit."

The judgment is final, but human rights groups plan to challenge it before the Inter-American Court of Human Rights, where it could in theory still be overuled.

Dominican President Danilo Medina appeared to distance himself from the ruling this week after he met with human rights groups. "I don't know if legally an injustice has been committed, but there's a human problem we have to solve," he said.

An immigrant census released earlier this year estimated there were 245,000 Dominican-born, first-generation children of immigrants living in the country. But the number affected by the ruling is likely to be exponentially higher, activists said, because it applies to other generations as well, such as Blemi and her children.

The vast majority of immigrant children - 210,000 - were of Haitian descent. It's estimated there are another 460,000 non-native Haitian migrants living in the country.

Mu-Kien Adriana Sang Ben, a noted Dominican historian and author, said the court sought to normalize a complicated migratory system but had only created an even more "serious and grave situation," with unintended consequences.

"This affects the sons and daughter of immigrants of not just Haitians, but Jews, Europeans, Chinese - the entire country," she told Reuters.

Sang's father was a Chinese immigrant who arrived in 1936 and became a legal resident before starting his family.

National Human Rights Commission President Manuel Maria Mercedes said the court clearly targeted the descendants of Haitians with the ruling: "This is racism and xenophobia."

The ruling touches a centuries-old nerve in the Dominican Republic, stemming from the country's occupation by neighbouring Haiti in the early 19th century.

After Haiti won its independence in 1804 from France in a bloody revolution led by former slaves, Haitian troops occupied the Dominican Republic, then ruled by Spain, for 22 years, from 1822 to 1844, when the country won its own independence. Dominican school textbooks recount atrocities committed by Haitian troops during the occupation.

Many poor Haitians continued to find work in the Dominican sugar cane fields though deep mistrust persisted. In 1937 Dominican dictator Rafael Trujillo sought to drive out the Haitians, resulting in a slaughter estimated at anywhere between 5,000 and 30,000 men, women and children.

The country is evenly divided over the citizenship issue, according to one poll.

The Dominican Republic, which has a population of about 10 million, has long complained of illegal migration of undocumented workers from its impoverished neighbour, even as it benefits from a steady source of cheap labour.

Most of those affected are the descendants of Haitians who moved to the Dominican Republic to work in the sugar cane fields. Many used a temporary worker's card issued by the former state sugar company as proof of their residence in order to register their offspring.

For decades, the government granted citizenship to all children born on Dominican soil, except those considered in transit, such as foreign diplomats posted in the country. The children of hundreds of thousands of immigrants were automatically granted citizenship once their birth was registered.

But in 2004, the government introduced a migration law that expanded definition of "in transit" to include the children of immigrant citizens without documentation. The government formalized that distinction in 2010 when it passed a new constitution.

"How can you be in transit for 40 years? Transit means coming through the airport for a brief stay on the way to somewhere else," said Eduardo Gamarra, a Caribbean expert at Florida International University in Miami who has done government consulting work in both Haiti and the Dominican Republic.

A network of human rights activists are drafting a letter to Secretary of State John Kerry and working to petition the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights and the U.N. Human Rights Committee based on alleged violations of international law.

Human rights groups successfully sued the Dominican government previously in the Inter-American Court on Human Rights with regard to the same issue. In 2005 the court ruled the government could not use a parent's in-transit status as a reason to deny citizenship.

The U.N. has already expressed concern that the ruling could create a human rights crisis.

The decision could have "disastrous" implications, leaving those affected "stateless and without access to basic services for which identity documents are required," Ravina Shamdasani, spokesperson for the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights, told reporters in Geneva.

In its decision, the Dominican Constitutional Court ordered a meticulous review of the civil registry back to 1929.

The court ruling gives the country's Electoral Board one year to draw up a list of people to be excluded from citizenship.

Blemi and others like her say the law leaves them with no future. "We don't have birth certificates that the children must have to study. We don't exist," said Blemi, a mother of three young children, the youngest only a month old.

"Please don't do this to me - I'm going to die," said her grandmother, 82-year-old Sentilia Igsema, showing her Dominican voter ID card.

"I'm asking myself what country am I from. I guess I'm from the country of the undocumented."

(Additional reporting by Manuel Jimenez and Ezra Fieser in Santo Domingo.; Editing by David Adams and Prudence Crowther)

Reuters
 

oceanspear

New member
Nov 23, 2012
222
0
0
What a disgrace and a shame. the PR fiasco and backlash will soon get this injustice corrected because money matters. How stupid, racist and xenophobic the clownish supreme court be?? what were they thinking???
 

DominicanBulgarian

New member
Sep 14, 2009
14
0
0
Other countries have similar laws such as Spain and I believe Germany and many others. If at least one of your parents is not a citizen of that country, you are not entitled to the citizenship of such country even if you're born there. So why are these protesters picking on the DR?

Thanks,
DominicanJB
 

kdolo

New member
Mar 9, 2009
367
6
0
What a disgrace and a shame. the PR fiasco and backlash will soon get this injustice corrected because money matters. How stupid, racist and xenophobic the clownish supreme court be?? what were they thinking???


Also, they are not understanding the economic impacts......

Tons of people who no longer have to hide in the shadows can now step forward and own businesses, work, and participate in society - once these people are given proper status, there will be an economics boon.
 

iluvdr

New member
Aug 24, 2004
362
2
0
Dominican JB . I would like to point to your attention that the DR as the law of Jus Soli.
This is not the issues here . All children born in DR are Dominicans according to the Constitution except the children born to diplomats and foreigners "in Transit "

The million dollar questions here is :

How can people who have lived here for over 80 years be considered "In transit '

We are not talking about the statuts of those people themself , but of there children and grand children who are born in DR ???

The law is the law , what is wrong is the interpretation of the law and decision of retro-activity of law taken by Supreme Court of the DR recently !

The decision is immoral , xenophobic , and unacceptable !
 

bluemoonnyc

New member
Oct 4, 2007
362
10
0
they put out a press release dated 3 days ahead of time? never saw that before,..sounds like amatuers, besides there are dozens of these silly little protests around NYC every day, nobody pays any attention to them.


PRESS RELEASE - New-York October 17th: Haitian Diaspora Announce Protest at Dominican Consulate against the court decision that stripped Million of Dominican of their CitizenshipBROOKLYN, NEW YORK? The Haitian Diaspora for Civic and Human Rights (HDRHR) in coalition with other civic organizations invites countless concerned citizens of all nations, to join us on October 17th for a huge protest in front of the Dominican Republic Consulate located at 1501 Broadway Ave, New York, NY. The rally will start at 2 pm until 6pm.

HDCHR et al will unequivocally demand to rescind the 168/13 ruling of September 23rd 2013 from the Dominican's Highest Court annulling the citizenship of half a million of Dominicans of Haitian decent including other ethnic groups, if they were not born before 1929 in the land.

This decision is an unashamed infringement of all international engagements of the Dominican Republic in violating the human rights and dignity of its population. It is also a

potential anthropological and civil genocide setting the ground for an eventual ethnic cleansing case on the Hispaniola Island.

As a reminder, in October 1937 height (8) years before the Jewish holocaust by Adolph Hitler, President General Rafael Leonidas Trujillo Y Molina has massacred 20 to 30,000 Haitians living in the borderlands of Dominican Republic. Historians label such massacre as The Parsley Massacre. Today, our generations have a moral obligation to stand against the current xenophobic ruling by the Highest Court. We fully support our Dominican brothers and sisters to prevent the power-brokers from recidivating another massacre, this time not by machetes but by their racist law.

Trujillo did it in 1937!

We must stop it from happening again in 2013

NO to civic genocide!

Yes to Human Rights!
 

jkc

New member
Jun 24, 2013
472
0
0
Also, they are not understanding the economic impacts......

Tons of people who no longer have to hide in the shadows can now step forward and own businesses, work, and participate in society - once these people are given proper status, there will be an economics boon.

NO CLUE of what the economic impact will be! So they think when people watch CNN and see that, they think these people are going to come to the DR? THINK again!
PR DISASTER!
 

drescape24

Bronze
Nov 2, 2011
1,918
0
36
I see this is a sensitive subject for the o.p., but I don't really think the average person cares about the status of Haitians living in the d.r. with or without papers. No little protest is going to stop anyones vacation. Maybe if unrest was shown on tv then maybe.
I wish my country would stop giving citizenship to every illegal who gave birth in side the country.

drescape24
 

mountainannie

Platinum
Dec 11, 2003
16,350
1,358
113
elizabetheames.blogspot.com
October 12, 2013 - 07:05

By Ricardo Rojas

LA ROMANA, Dominican Republic (Reuters) - For four generations Banesa Blemi's family, descendants of Haitian immigrants, put down roots as low-wage sugar cane cutters in their adopted homeland, and came to consider themselves Dominicans.

Then, last month the country's Constitutional Court issued a decision effectively denationalizing Blemi and her family, along with an estimated 250,000 fellow immigrants born after 1929.

"I have no country. What will become of me?" said Blemi, 27, standing with relatives outside the family's wooden shack near La Romana, the heart of the Dominican Republic's sugar cane industry and one of the Caribbean's top tourist resorts.

"We are Dominicans - we have never been to Haiti. We were born and raised here. We don't even speak Creole," she said, referring to Haiti's native tongue.

The September 23 court ruling retroactively denies Dominican nationality to anyone born after 1929 who does not have at least one parent of Dominican blood, under a constitutional clause declaring all others to be either in the country illegally or "in transit."

The judgment is final, but human rights groups plan to challenge it before the Inter-American Court of Human Rights, where it could in theory still be overuled.

Dominican President Danilo Medina appeared to distance himself from the ruling this week after he met with human rights groups. "I don't know if legally an injustice has been committed, but there's a human problem we have to solve," he said.

An immigrant census released earlier this year estimated there were 245,000 Dominican-born, first-generation children of immigrants living in the country. But the number affected by the ruling is likely to be exponentially higher, activists said, because it applies to other generations as well, such as Blemi and her children.

The vast majority of immigrant children - 210,000 - were of Haitian descent. It's estimated there are another 460,000 non-native Haitian migrants living in the country.

Mu-Kien Adriana Sang Ben, a noted Dominican historian and author, said the court sought to normalize a complicated migratory system but had only created an even more "serious and grave situation," with unintended consequences.

"This affects the sons and daughter of immigrants of not just Haitians, but Jews, Europeans, Chinese - the entire country," she told Reuters.

Sang's father was a Chinese immigrant who arrived in 1936 and became a legal resident before starting his family.

National Human Rights Commission President Manuel Maria Mercedes said the court clearly targeted the descendants of Haitians with the ruling: "This is racism and xenophobia."

The ruling touches a centuries-old nerve in the Dominican Republic, stemming from the country's occupation by neighbouring Haiti in the early 19th century.

After Haiti won its independence in 1804 from France in a bloody revolution led by former slaves, Haitian troops occupied the Dominican Republic, then ruled by Spain, for 22 years, from 1822 to 1844, when the country won its own independence. Dominican school textbooks recount atrocities committed by Haitian troops during the occupation.

Many poor Haitians continued to find work in the Dominican sugar cane fields though deep mistrust persisted. In 1937 Dominican dictator Rafael Trujillo sought to drive out the Haitians, resulting in a slaughter estimated at anywhere between 5,000 and 30,000 men, women and children.

The country is evenly divided over the citizenship issue, according to one poll.

The Dominican Republic, which has a population of about 10 million, has long complained of illegal migration of undocumented workers from its impoverished neighbour, even as it benefits from a steady source of cheap labour.

Most of those affected are the descendants of Haitians who moved to the Dominican Republic to work in the sugar cane fields. Many used a temporary worker's card issued by the former state sugar company as proof of their residence in order to register their offspring.

For decades, the government granted citizenship to all children born on Dominican soil, except those considered in transit, such as foreign diplomats posted in the country. The children of hundreds of thousands of immigrants were automatically granted citizenship once their birth was registered.

But in 2004, the government introduced a migration law that expanded definition of "in transit" to include the children of immigrant citizens without documentation. The government formalized that distinction in 2010 when it passed a new constitution.

"How can you be in transit for 40 years? Transit means coming through the airport for a brief stay on the way to somewhere else," said Eduardo Gamarra, a Caribbean expert at Florida International University in Miami who has done government consulting work in both Haiti and the Dominican Republic.

A network of human rights activists are drafting a letter to Secretary of State John Kerry and working to petition the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights and the U.N. Human Rights Committee based on alleged violations of international law.

Human rights groups successfully sued the Dominican government previously in the Inter-American Court on Human Rights with regard to the same issue. In 2005 the court ruled the government could not use a parent's in-transit status as a reason to deny citizenship.

The U.N. has already expressed concern that the ruling could create a human rights crisis.

The decision could have "disastrous" implications, leaving those affected "stateless and without access to basic services for which identity documents are required," Ravina Shamdasani, spokesperson for the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights, told reporters in Geneva.

In its decision, the Dominican Constitutional Court ordered a meticulous review of the civil registry back to 1929.

The court ruling gives the country's Electoral Board one year to draw up a list of people to be excluded from citizenship.

Blemi and others like her say the law leaves them with no future. "We don't have birth certificates that the children must have to study. We don't exist," said Blemi, a mother of three young children, the youngest only a month old.

"Please don't do this to me - I'm going to die," said her grandmother, 82-year-old Sentilia Igsema, showing her Dominican voter ID card.

"I'm asking myself what country am I from. I guess I'm from the country of the undocumented."

(Additional reporting by Manuel Jimenez and Ezra Fieser in Santo Domingo.; Editing by David Adams and Prudence Crowther)

Reuters


It really astonishes me how again and again the press reports omit the part of the TC sentance which directs the Executive Branch to come up with a plan to regularize the status of these immigrants.
 

iluvdr

New member
Aug 24, 2004
362
2
0
It really astonishes me how again and again the press reports omit the part of the TC sentance which directs the Executive Branch to come up with a plan to regularize the status of these immigrants.

Mountainannie... the courts are mocking these people by adding injury to insult.
You are asking them to lose there Dominican Citizenship , become stateless and re-applying as Residents.
That's never going to work , because they would need to get documents from where they came from.
The Dominicans of Haitian descent, are born in DR some 2-3 generation ago.
Where do you expect them to get documents of there fathers or grandfathers ???
This plan is nothing but trickery...
Like when the Nazis told the Jews to come peacefully that they where being relocated and that everything was going to fine.
We all know how that story ends.
My purpose in this post is to educate and help.
People are confused , mixing apples and oranges... We are not talking about the "ILLEGAL HAITIANS" here , but about "REAL DOMINICANS" with there DOMINICAN passports and cedulas who are being threaten of being stripped of there citizenship ???
This is what is unfair and unacceptable !!!
 

iluvdr

New member
Aug 24, 2004
362
2
0
This is the fault off the Haitian Government, thy don't give them legal papers,so don't blame d Dominican government!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

How is the Haitian Government involve here ? Do you have any idea how many Dominicans are undocumented ?
Try to think 80 some years ago , how many ?
Once again , this decision as nothing to do with "ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION" it is about the children born in Dominican Republic to these "ILLLEGAL ALIENS" that the Supreme court as recently tagged as FOREIGNERS "IN TRANSIT" ?
The laws need to be clear and transparent. The Haitians who where brought here, some 80 years ago, to work in sugar cane plantation by the DR government are either "ILLEGAL" or "IN TRANSIT". Back then the Dominican government, did not ask for proper documentation , they just loaded them on trucks like cattle and drop them of at the Batey's. The authorities chose not to label them or give them any status. Those workers can not be both "ILLEGAL" and "IN TRANSIT" or the 2010 amendment would not make since, because it excludes children born from Diplomats, foreigners in transit and Illegal immigrants ???
Do you get it ? The new law , if applied , is retroactive and will strip over 250,000 Dominicans of there citizenship, mainly because of there Haitians ancestry . We are not talking here at all about "ILLEGALS" . This is a whole other topic....
 

jkc

New member
Jun 24, 2013
472
0
0
Dominican JB . I would like to point to your attention that the DR as the law of Jus Soli.This is not the issues here . All children born in DR are Dominicans according to the Constitution except the children born to diplomats and foreigners "in Transit "

The million dollar questions here is :

How can people who have lived here for over 80 years be considered "In transit '

We are not talking about the statuts of those people themself , but of there children and grand children who are born in DR ???

The law is the law , what is wrong is the interpretation of the law and decision of retro-activity of law taken by Supreme Court of the DR recently !

The decision is immoral , xenophobic , and unacceptable !

And people still arguing over this? Wow
The funny thing, some people are saying that DR has no orders to take from any other countries. What they do not know that countries even the IVY LEAGUES, THE BIG GUYS like THE USA and others have to respect CONVENTIONS. So, people making such NATIONALISTIC STATEMENS, do not know much and should refrain from talkinga about stuffs like that.

Frankly, these guys from the CONSTITUTIONAL COURTS, have no clue, how the world functions today. The world is a SMALL PLACE. Even the big countries cannot function on their own. In the usa, marches have forced MULTINATIONALS LIKE WALMART and others to behave a certain way. Walmart can probably buy the entire CARIBBEAN with their CHECKING ACCOUNT.
So, the MEMBERS OF THIS COURT ARE OUT OF TOUCH!
 

mofongoloco

Silver
Feb 7, 2013
3,002
9
38
So I have this as a google alert so I keep getting blasted. The newspapers and mainstream media always get something wrong. The blogs are more accurate but partisan. The comments...Well sometimes I swear I recognize voices from the board. The one thing is I haven't seen any CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC! But I keep looking!

Anyway, would this be an appropriate thread to post links from other news sources? i'm not so sure the whole world is so upset about it. Seems like the usual suspects to me. snark snark.