Dr Guzaman has pointed out that "facts" in the DR are different than other places. For example, he pointed out that the facts of a contract written between an employee and and employer are not really facts, but are irrelevant in the DR. As others have pointed out, the employee always wins. This is also my experience.
The judge will determine the facts. What the contract says may not coincide at all with the "reality" of the relationship.
As a general rule, Dominican courts apply the doctrine of “legal subordination” (“subordinaci?n jur?dica”) to determine whether a particular contract constitutes a labor contract or not. According to this doctrine, a person is a worker if he finds himself under the authority of another person ( the employer) and receives instructions and guidance from him in the execution of the tasks to be performed.
The terms “authority,” “instructions” and “guidance” are not legally defined, therefore, the application of the doctrine is sometimes difficult. In practical terms, Dominican courts look at the following factors to determine if legal subordination exists:
a) Place of work
b) Works hours
c) Materials and tools
d) Exclusivity
e) Dependent personnel
If a person works at his own office, at his own pace, with his own materials and tools, has several clients and his own employees, then it is 100% certain that he is not a worker.
On the other hand, for example, if an American is brought to the Dominican Republic by a company, with a monthly advance for living expenses, to work under “the policies, standards, regulations of Company from time to time established,” “while following Company’s sales process, policies and training,” with the brochures and other materials supplied by the Company, with no dependent personnel and exclusively for the Company, then it is very likely that a Dominican court will determine that he is a worker and not an independent contractor, no matter how many contracts state the "fact" that he's in an independent contractor.