International Living Mag list DR as 19th best place to retire in 2016....Not to shabby imho...
https://internationalliving.com/2016/01/the-best-places-to-retire-2016/
https://internationalliving.com/2016/01/the-best-places-to-retire-2016/
I have been receiving information from this publication for some years and what surprises me is how the position of countries change relatively quickly ..how an a place be no one for a year and suddenly number 10 or worse..do they want us to be moving all the time to seek perfection .
The entire basis of rating is flawed and much of the information is totally incorrect .Further more what is a good retirement place for low or middle income people may be totally wrong for people with higher retirement incomes. Also, different people look for different things but the common thing I believe in retirement is to have a variety of interests .
Before I retired I had two positions that involved me visiting many countries every year and shortly before retiring I had drawn up a short list of countries and I visited them before deciding on the DR. Each country had pluses and minuses but the DR ticked more boxes than the others at that particular time . It probably still does.
great post!!!
all these biggest, baddest, and best articles are horse manure. i remember one year the DR was rated the Happiest place on earth. two years later, it was not on the charts. just last week, some guy on CNN rated it the greatest snorkeling tourist destination on earth. i checked other opinions, and could not find it anywhere else. i looked at the list of the 25 best destinations on earth, and it is not on that list.
heck...you have to fill up print space in magazines. half these writers have never been to the places they list.
I have been receiving information from this publication for some years and what surprises me is how the position of countries change relatively quickly ..how can a place be number one for a year and suddenly number 10 or worse..do they want us to be moving all the time to seek perfection .
The entire basis of rating is flawed and much of the information is totally incorrect .Further more what is a good retirement place for low or middle income people may be totally wrong for people with higher retirement incomes. Also, different people look for different things but the common thing I believe in retirement is to have a variety of interests .
Before I retired I had two positions that involved me visiting many countries every year and shortly before retiring I had drawn up a short list of countries and I visited them before deciding on the DR. Each country had pluses and minuses but the DR ticked more boxes than the others at that particular time . It probably still does.
The questions on healthy living were how easy it is to have a healthy lifestyle. In my opinion it is easy here as there is fresh fruit, veg and meat. You can even eat it straight from the ground or the tree or grow it yourself. You can choose to walk, hike or swim. The questions were the availability of a healthy lifestyle but yes each to his own.
Matilda
It's marketing paid for by advertising. Accuracy in content isn't part of the equation. I'm retiring in the DR because I can live without some essentials and I like mi esposa. For a couple in their 60s or 70s, the DR usually isn't a top choice.
There are hundreds of pluses and minuses and what works is completely arbitrary.
Meanwhile another retired couple was just murdered in their home last week...
yes and the best in the DR is Casa de Campo ...they claim they have won many awards on their merits but everyone knows it is the result of advertising dollars...they only fool themselves..