I have been told that under Dominican law, insurance on a vehicle does not cover the civil liability or the medical damages suffered by family members riding as passengers in the vehicle, and additionally, in the case of a vehicle owned by a company, that employees of the company and their family members are not covered for either of these liabilities. I was told that the assumption is that the injured party's health insurance will cover their problems. The insurance broker looked at me as if I were a 2 headed cow when I said I wanted this coverage on my vehicle.
I am accustomed to the common law system, where a corporation is a separate legal entity, and any legal person, including an employee or a family member, is a separate legal entity, and therefore they are protected by the 3rd-Party Liability coverage on the insurance. Apparently this is not true in the DR, OR it is a specific exclusion under the policy.
If this is truly the case, my question is "how do other companies in the DR protect both themselves, and their employees, in the case where they are travelling in a company vehicle, the company driver is at fault, there are damages suffered,and the employees have very little health coverage." This leaves the owner of the vehicle wide open to be forced to begin writing checks because this liability is not covered, and as well, the employee to lay injured in their sala because they elected to, or could not afford to have health insurance coverage. and a successful lawsuit would take months or years to fight through the system.
Please don't start firing off a bunch of liberal responses telling me to stop being cheap and buy the employees their own health insurance. They have the legally required health coverage now. I want the protection from liability and for everyone, including my own family, to be protected from any potential major personal injuries as well. An umbrella liability policy excludes coverage for these liabilities also. Tell me the reasonable solution to the problem.
Fabio???
I am accustomed to the common law system, where a corporation is a separate legal entity, and any legal person, including an employee or a family member, is a separate legal entity, and therefore they are protected by the 3rd-Party Liability coverage on the insurance. Apparently this is not true in the DR, OR it is a specific exclusion under the policy.
If this is truly the case, my question is "how do other companies in the DR protect both themselves, and their employees, in the case where they are travelling in a company vehicle, the company driver is at fault, there are damages suffered,and the employees have very little health coverage." This leaves the owner of the vehicle wide open to be forced to begin writing checks because this liability is not covered, and as well, the employee to lay injured in their sala because they elected to, or could not afford to have health insurance coverage. and a successful lawsuit would take months or years to fight through the system.
Please don't start firing off a bunch of liberal responses telling me to stop being cheap and buy the employees their own health insurance. They have the legally required health coverage now. I want the protection from liability and for everyone, including my own family, to be protected from any potential major personal injuries as well. An umbrella liability policy excludes coverage for these liabilities also. Tell me the reasonable solution to the problem.
Fabio???