A.J.it's a two way street------
The Dominican Government has just last week (I think) requested the extradition of aan American who is alledged to have been intimately and deeply involved in the :Renove" scandal. It would seem that your "hypocracy" label would also apply to the Dominican Government.
In actuality, extradition is a legal method to gain possession of person(s) who are perceived to be criminals in violation of both local country laws and international law. It is a vehicle used to begin a judicial solution to many felonious crimes committed and where the perpetrator has "flown the coop" so to speak. Were it not for such agreements between nations, we would forever have criminals amoungst us whom we should fear but can't touch.
Extradition is not easy to come by. A body of evidence must be presented that is overwhelmingly positive that the subject has, in fact, committed the crime for which extradition is sought. Even then, it is very difficult to effect such an act.
Rethink your position in light of the above before you accuse any nation of "hypocracy"!
amd remember that you are dealing a blow to national honor when you do so.
Texas Bill
Edited to add:
Deportation is another matter altogether.
When a foreign national violates the laws ( or regulations pertaining to the residency therein) of the country in which he is residing, he subjects himself to regulatory or judicial review of his status in that country. If it is determined ( and in many cases that determination is ambiguous and preemptory) that he has not performed in accordance with good citizenship ( that is, he has failed to keep the proper authorities up to date as to his location, or has committed a crime, or series of crimes, misdemeanors or felonies) then he is subjected to a regulatory and/or judicial review and if there is a preponderance of evidence to support it he is deported. If the case has criminal overtones, he is arraigned and prosecuted and if found guilty, he serves his sentence and is then deported as an undesirable. He is further denied to ever be able to reenter the country. I believe the later is very much universal. Regulatory violatiors may possibly be allowed to reapply after a given time lapse.
Hope that clears up the "hypocracy" question.
If I'm wrong in my statements, someone please correct me. Don't want A.J. to get the wrong info.
Texas Bill