I run a small business in London which allows me to travel. For various reasons I am intending to buy a small flat in the Zona Colonial with the primary intention of using it myself, but also renting it on a short term basis when I'm not there.
I have the funds in a UK account paying about 6%. My understanding is that property values are increasing at a rate higher than this (estimates vary widely, but no-one seems to think under 6%). Therefore, even if I never use the flat and don't rent it, I haven't lost anything.
Since I'm not seeking to optimise an investment, it doesn't worry me too much that the DR is given a lowly one star by the property guide. Johne's comments same thing.
It does worry me that there may be a problem getting possesion if a tenant overstays, and I should have identified this earlier. Otherwise, I see few problems in principle (there are some issues over the specific properties I'm looking at) in taking this foward. If I've missed something, please point it out, but in specific terms please, not generalities.
It's not my intention to appear to be arrogantly ignoring advise I'm given - I did ask for it, after all. But I asked for information, not opinions about whether I'm doing the right thing. I'm perfectly happy to consider the latter, but if I need to spend a year in the DR before buying, you really need to explain why this is. You can't expect me to accept it just because a few people state that this is so.