While I'm not a prolific poster, I AM a guy who appreciates the wealth of knowledge available here, and the board members' willingness to help. It truly IS a community - a wonderful thing, that.
I've spent a fair amount of time the last couple days reading old threads that interested me. And have been almost as entertained by the moderators' viewpoints as by the other content. Things like one mod blessing a thread, the other closing it. And "there's a very real danger of this thread becoming off topic to the DR..."
The board that I have been most active over the years with is soon approaching it's 10th anniversary. I've been there from the beginning. It's sponsored completely by a sailing magazine, so has no advertisers' pressures to deal with - although I'm not certain that advertisers ever really care about much more than readership. Maybe they do- is beyond my expertise. BUT - this board I'm referring to has a section devoted only to offtopic stuff. anything goes, there.
The kicker to all this is - this other board is completely unmoderated, and possible the most civil in how posters treat each other, than ANY I've ever seen. Well - there is a guy who will gently chide any truly offensive, unruly posters - but NEVER closes a thread, or get his panties in a wad over being offtopic. The most moderation I've EVER seen there is to delete a post, or send a thread to the offtopic area.
I guess I'm wondering why DR1, and most boards similar, see moderation as a crucial part of day to day life? Especially when the moderation is as unpredictable as it is? I mean, really, what's the harm if a thread veers offtopic? I guess if a poster proves himself/herself to be simply intolerably offensive to the principles of the board, then restricting their abilities to continue posting is called for. But honestly, what's everyone so scared of in a thread that began as directly related to the DR, but veers off in a different philosophic direction? Nobody's forced to read ANY thread, near as I can determine.
Anyway, maybe someone can help me understand this philosophy? I'm...confused. But intellectually curious.
And before anyone jumps me with "if you don't like it, leave!" - please understand that I'm truly not being critical. It is what it is, and I really enjoy DR1. I just don't understand the rationale, and would like to. It interests me.
I've spent a fair amount of time the last couple days reading old threads that interested me. And have been almost as entertained by the moderators' viewpoints as by the other content. Things like one mod blessing a thread, the other closing it. And "there's a very real danger of this thread becoming off topic to the DR..."
The board that I have been most active over the years with is soon approaching it's 10th anniversary. I've been there from the beginning. It's sponsored completely by a sailing magazine, so has no advertisers' pressures to deal with - although I'm not certain that advertisers ever really care about much more than readership. Maybe they do- is beyond my expertise. BUT - this board I'm referring to has a section devoted only to offtopic stuff. anything goes, there.
The kicker to all this is - this other board is completely unmoderated, and possible the most civil in how posters treat each other, than ANY I've ever seen. Well - there is a guy who will gently chide any truly offensive, unruly posters - but NEVER closes a thread, or get his panties in a wad over being offtopic. The most moderation I've EVER seen there is to delete a post, or send a thread to the offtopic area.
I guess I'm wondering why DR1, and most boards similar, see moderation as a crucial part of day to day life? Especially when the moderation is as unpredictable as it is? I mean, really, what's the harm if a thread veers offtopic? I guess if a poster proves himself/herself to be simply intolerably offensive to the principles of the board, then restricting their abilities to continue posting is called for. But honestly, what's everyone so scared of in a thread that began as directly related to the DR, but veers off in a different philosophic direction? Nobody's forced to read ANY thread, near as I can determine.
Anyway, maybe someone can help me understand this philosophy? I'm...confused. But intellectually curious.
And before anyone jumps me with "if you don't like it, leave!" - please understand that I'm truly not being critical. It is what it is, and I really enjoy DR1. I just don't understand the rationale, and would like to. It interests me.