FYI -Sponsored Family Members..re Immigration Canada

tinkerbell

New member
Dec 4, 2009
2
0
0
Court rules sponsors not automatically accountable for family members? social assistance debt

Monday, 30 November 2009 00:00 | Earlier this month, the Ontario Court of Appeal ordered governments to stop automatically charging individuals, who have sponsored relatives to come to Canada as permanent residents, for social assistance debt sustained by those relatives.

Under the Family Class Sponsorship program, a Canadian citizen or permanent resident can sponsor close family members to become Canadian permanent residents, as long as both the sponsor and the sponsored persons fulfill certain requirements.

As part of the application process, the sponsor signs an agreement that he or she will provide for the basic requirements of the sponsored persons for a specified length of time, depending on the relationship between the sponsor and the family members. Should the sponsored persons require social assistance during this period, the sponsor must repay the federal and provincial governments for any benefits their family members received.

In the case before the Court, eight individuals, who had each sponsored a relative for Canadian permanent residency, claimed that extenuating circumstances beyond their control prevented them from honouring their sponsorship obligations, and applied to be discharged from those obligations.

The Court held that Canada and Ontario owe sponsors a duty of procedural fairness when enforcing sponsorship debt, and ordered the creation of a process that will allow sponsors to explain their personal and financial circumstances, which in some cases may allow them to avoid paying sponsorship debt.

This decision has caused considerable debate in Canada and it is uncertain, at this time, if the case will be appealed to the Supreme Court of Canada.
 

Barbie38

New member
Apr 15, 2009
79
2
0
I do feel that the government needs to enforce both sides of the undertaking. You as the sponsor have agreed to provide the person with basic necessities but if that person then decides to leave you have little control over what they decide to do. Also, they person needs to understand that when they apply for social assistance their sponsor is responsible for paying the government back because of the sponsorship agreement. A friend of mine is dealing with this issue at the moment and stuck between her sponsorship agreement, welfare and trying to get a separation agreement in place under family law. It is very complicated and her exhusband doesn't understand that she is required to pay for the welfare he is collecting. He just thinks it's some government 'funding' for him as a new immigrant. Although I hate to see our court systems throwing away money they do, the federal government does need to come up with a way to appeal the sponsorship agreement if the person being sponsored entered into it in bad faith and/or did not understand the undertaking. At the moment there doesn't appear to be any process to deal with this.