Mr_DR said:
Call it what you want, but you cant get one without the other,
and i think that you are the one that is confused about the whole thing.
What do you think is the main reason countries go to war?
Even if the two governements were to come into an agreement, it does not means that it's citizens would also be happy about it which would constribute to a major revolution.
If It is hard to unify two groups in the same country what makes you think two countries would be easier without having some form of revolts?
If its slowly phased in, it will work.
The evidence to this are the current countries of the world. Each and every single one of them are the result of an idea of unification among peoples who were alike. As such, a small phase of such idea grew and grew as more people saw the economic benefits of such union. As time went on, these people eventually believed in their ideas so much that they became a full fledge nation.
Look at Germany, look at the USA, look at Brazil, look at China, look at Mexico, heck, even look at the DR!
Each country has different groups of people who believe in an idea of union because its in the best economic interest for them. Why do you think the Cibao is not a separate country, afterall that is the only area of the country that has a remote chance of making it by itself given that 60% of the population lives there and a whopping 40% of the total GDP is produced there.
Or, why don't Santo Domingo become a city state? Not only does that city holds a third of the population, but that city produces another 40% of the total GDP! That's impressive! What the entire Cibao valley produces in wealth is produced in the crowded 400 square miles capital city! Plus, both people are proud enough of themselves to actually become separate countries and yet, they don't. Instead, they agree to remain united under the idea of one country, but still retain regional differences. Also, the South and the East are quite unique, though given their weak regional economies compared to SDQ and the Cibao, they might not do well, but be marginalized. In fact, the South and the East would be the biggest losers if the Cibao and Santo Domingo decide to go it alone!
But, they don't. The same thing happens in every country in the world. The US has distinct suttle differences between its four main regions (New England, the Midwest, the South, and the West and yet, they remain united. Italy is ubsurdly different within any given couple of square kilometers! You go from town to town in Italy and each town seem to have its own unique version of music, food, and speech patterns. On top of that, the towns are sometimes so close to each other that they are simultaneously visible from either town and yet, they are so different. But, they remain united under the idea of one unified Italy.
A unification of the Spanish Caribbean would prove to be successful, simply because of pure economics. However, I have said this numerous times already, it must be phased in slowly for this to take the most efficient and strongest effect. Coming out tomorrow with a political agenda to unite it by next year would only bring distaste and controversy for an idea that would actually do more economic good than harm to all three societies.
By the way, Cibaenos don't like it when Capitalenos make fun of them, but in the end, we still get along for the sake of the country!