A shot in the *ss? Too funny*:cheeky:
[video=youtube;DW33yg06-w0]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DW33yg06-w0[/video]
A shot in the *ss? Too funny*:cheeky:
There is so much wrong with the way this unfolded based on the info available.*
1) Shooting at a fleeing property crime suspect who isn't an immediate threat to anyone
2) Very few cops here have the training & practice to be competent shooting at anything
3) Discharging a handgun in a high density area of a tourist town (see #2)
4) I bet more than one shot was sent down range. Wonder where those bullets ended up - obviously not in the suspect.*
More details needed, but is sounds like a clusterpuk from start to finish.
There is so much wrong with the way this unfolded based on the info available.*
1) Shooting at a fleeing property crime suspect who isn't an immediate threat to anyone
2) Very few cops here have the training & practice to be competent shooting at anything
3) Discharging a handgun in a high density area of a tourist town (see #2)
4) I bet more than one shot was sent down range. Wonder where those bullets ended up - obviously not in the suspect.*
More details needed, but is sounds like a clusterpuk from start to finish.
In civilized societies we do not shoot people in the *back who are
fleeing an alleged property crime.
the cops here shoot people daily. dude was lucky he got one in the ass and not in the head. bigger target.
A fleeing criminal is always a threat as they often use escalating violence, and if we stop pursuing fleeing suspects then there will be no more stopping crime.
...I would rather the police shoot first than the criminals.
Shooting a criminal in the leg (i.e. wounding as opposed to killing) pretty much guarantees they will come back for revenge once they are healed.
If you kill them, then you only have to worry about revenge from the family.