No, not really. But I can guess how the world will react.
1) Official govt travel advisories in most countries will continue to advise citizen not to travel abroad for the foreseeable future.
2) Insurance companies will continue to deny travel coverage to anyone who chooses to disregard the advice and refrain from int'l travel.
3) DR Insurance companies who are still issuing policies are excluding any treatment related to CV19 in those new policies.
4) If you leave your home country there is the very real risk that you could find yourself stranded abroad again for a whole multitude of reasons.
5) Voluntary travel to countries that require a period of quarantine upon arrival doesn't make sense.
6) Things may appear to be bad (CV19) where you are now, but trust me, anywhere in the Caribbean or the less developed world they are much worse (unquantifiably worse).
7) It is still and will remain a priority to attempt to protect the chronically ill and aged from becoming infected by an increasingly anxious and cavalier public. If there is any logic being applied to this situation at all by any national government, then int'l travel should be the very last "reopening" measure to see the light of day. Even if the DR loses it's collective mind completely and opens the borders to tourists without arrival restrictions, most of the world will maintain policies that will make such a trip impractical, possibly prohibited and very inconvenient to return home from when the vacation is over. Those wishing to travel and stay somewhere for an extended period of time might find that a bit easier to do. But, to do so without adequate health insurance in place would be extremely risky bordering on foolhardy.
There is lots of CV19 here in the DR for people to catch. The idea that someone who has not yet achieved immunity would voluntarily choose to come here, boggles my mind.
1) Official govt travel advisories in most countries will continue to advise citizen not to travel abroad for the foreseeable future.
2) Insurance companies will continue to deny travel coverage to anyone who chooses to disregard the advice and refrain from int'l travel.
3) DR Insurance companies who are still issuing policies are excluding any treatment related to CV19 in those new policies.
4) If you leave your home country there is the very real risk that you could find yourself stranded abroad again for a whole multitude of reasons.
5) Voluntary travel to countries that require a period of quarantine upon arrival doesn't make sense.
6) Things may appear to be bad (CV19) where you are now, but trust me, anywhere in the Caribbean or the less developed world they are much worse (unquantifiably worse).
7) It is still and will remain a priority to attempt to protect the chronically ill and aged from becoming infected by an increasingly anxious and cavalier public. If there is any logic being applied to this situation at all by any national government, then int'l travel should be the very last "reopening" measure to see the light of day. Even if the DR loses it's collective mind completely and opens the borders to tourists without arrival restrictions, most of the world will maintain policies that will make such a trip impractical, possibly prohibited and very inconvenient to return home from when the vacation is over. Those wishing to travel and stay somewhere for an extended period of time might find that a bit easier to do. But, to do so without adequate health insurance in place would be extremely risky bordering on foolhardy.
There is lots of CV19 here in the DR for people to catch. The idea that someone who has not yet achieved immunity would voluntarily choose to come here, boggles my mind.