Back at the down of CV19 a few months after it escaped Wuhan labs, I posited that with it being so contagious that is was likely to kill 1 out of 200 people infected or 0.5%. I think my estimates were very conservative back then when I used 10 times more infections than were officially being counted.
Note that the number of infected used by the statisticians is official cases, if cannot be anything else unless we are using estimated cases.
It is without any doubt that there are FAR more cases of
CV19 than the official cases. Yet now, If we just use the official cases as of today
6,392,606 official deaths
570,188,694 official cases
Percentage of deaths: 6,392,606/570,188,694 x100 = 1.12 percent
I propose it is a fact that the number of infections is far higher than 570 million and the actual death rate far lower than even 0.5% now that we have so many years of data and experience with how contagious it has become. Death rates from all infections are probably in the 0.1% range.
Is it worth creating new ways of preventing CV19 and all the variants from sickening or killing people? Of course it is.
A vaccine per variant, let's say? Go for it. Why not?
There is still a ton of money left in that. In the unlikely event a new variant is more deadly, the sky is the limit.