At what point does Domincan law supersede regulations passed by a condo association, thus making the association regs invalid, null and void?
example: prohibiting licensed, legalized firearms to be kept in an
owner's condo
: prohibiting 2 day rentals
: prohibiting rentals to people with young children
To me such regs conflict with basic ownership rights bestowed to everyone who owns property in the DR. A more basic example; a condo association could make a reg saying no foreigners or black people can buy a condo in their association. Obviously, this would be unlawful. I have done the legal thread research and reviewed condo law 5038. It seems unclear to me. Any guidance would be appreciated. K
example: prohibiting licensed, legalized firearms to be kept in an
owner's condo
: prohibiting 2 day rentals
: prohibiting rentals to people with young children
To me such regs conflict with basic ownership rights bestowed to everyone who owns property in the DR. A more basic example; a condo association could make a reg saying no foreigners or black people can buy a condo in their association. Obviously, this would be unlawful. I have done the legal thread research and reviewed condo law 5038. It seems unclear to me. Any guidance would be appreciated. K