But born in the DR and living in DR all their lives makes them Dominicans. A legislature can declare that the Earth is flat but this does not make the Earth flat; and a legislature can declare that a Dominican is a Haitian, but all they are doing is manufacturing documents.
Legislation also says the DR exists. Benefits are also legislative and documentative. Oh wait, you don´t believe in legislation or the abstract.
If a legislation says the earth is flat, it does makes the earth flat before the law. You seem to not understand that legal reality is based on its own legal definitions.
Its the same with the legislation that says that everyone is equal before the law.
The same with the one-drop-rule that defined who was black in the USA.
In most countries legislation says you can only be a man or a woman, while in some countries legislation says a person can be any of 3 or 4 or 10 or whatever amount of genders. What anyone thinks about this is irrelevant before the law of each country.
Its the same with everything.
The point is that you are arguing for something that you yourself negate its existence. It´s a contradiction at its finest.
A person can claim to be whatever they like, but before the law the rules are clearly set and what matters is what those rules say. No one is Dominican because they say it, wish it, or have documents procured from an initial fraud. Dominican is what the Dominican constitution says. Every son/daughter born to a Dominican outside the DR is Dominican even if the person neber sets foot on the DR. The children of illegal immigrants in the DR are not Dominicans. Every son/daughter born to a Haitian is a Haitian regardless of place of birth. There´s nothing you can do about that and no amount of denying that will make it go away or change it.
In fact, the only thing your actions will do is for Dominicans to set the rule in stone. You are basicallydoing what the pro-Haitian NGO´s did regarding the definition of ´in transit´ in all Dominican constitutions since 1929. The Supreme Court of every country is the entity that sets the interpretation of anything in the constitution, its the maximum authority on making the rules clear. The pro-Haitian NGO´s simply denied the faculty that is given to all Suprene Courts. The end result was that Dominicans set the rule in such a stone that the NGO´s initial argument on ´in transit´ is now irrelevant. Guess what? Nothing changed except that now the rule is harder for them to challenge. That´s the Dominican way.