Grupo M tries to break union at Juana Mendez

CharlesArthur

New member
Nov 7, 2003
8
0
0
63
www.haitisupport.gn.apc.org
Haiti Support Group press release, 14 June 2004

Grupo M has fired 301 workers at the Codevi free trade zone at Ouanaminthe.

Dominican soldiers have been brought in to terrorise the workers.

The management has threatened to close the factory down rather than negotiate on pay and conditions with the union.


Since the beginning of June there has been a dramatic deterioration in the situation at the Codevi free trade zone in north-east Haiti. Following an international campaign in support of the 34 union members sacked in early March, negotiations in April led to an agreement between management and workers. By mid-May, all the sacked workers were back to work but, on 4 June, a breach of the May agreement led to a one-hour warning strike. The following day, the head of the Grupo M company arrived at the Codevi plant to tell workers that the plant would probably be shut down because of the continuing labour unrest. Then, in the afternoon, after another dispute had developed when management forcibly removed the t-shirts and ID badges of a group of women, the management called in the Dominican Army to expel workers from the free trade zone.

A full one-day strike then took place on Monday, 7 June. Workers agreed to return to work on 8 June despite the continuing presence of the Dominican Army because the management had agreed to negotiate with the union. However, when the workers showed up to work at 5:30am, they found that they were locked-out.

On 9 June, Grupo M announced to the media that it was abandoning production at the Codevi free trade zone and laying off all 700 workers because of what it described as "security reasons in the face of threats and violent actions by a group of activists called Batay Ouvriye."

By the end of the week, half of the production units were closed down at Codevi and 254 workers had been arbitrarily dismissed - including the coordinator and secretary of the SOKOWA union. Over the weekend, the company started advertising new jobs at its assembly plant in Santiago, the Dominican Republic.


The actions of the Grupo M company are scandalous violations of internationally recognised workers' rights, and immediate protests must be registered.

Please send email now. Either use the form at LabourStart: http://www.labourstart.org/cgi-bin/solidarityforever/show_campaign.cgi?c=30

or write your own emails to:
Fernando Capellan, CEO of Grupo M
e-mail: fcapellan@grupom.com.do
telling him that Grupo M must immediately end the violence against workers;
that the Dominican Armed Forces must be immediately and permanently withdrawn from the Codevi FTZ;
that all management personnel found to have committed violent acts against workers must be disciplined;
that negotiations in good faith with SOKOWA and the Batay Ouvriye workers' organisation must begin;
that arbitrarily fired workers must be re-instated, and that threats to close the factory must cease.

Remind him of his obligation to respect workers? rights under Haitian law, of the code of conduct of his client, Levi Strauss, and of the World Bank's loan conditions.


Please also write to:
Michael Kobori, Global Code of Conduct Director, Levi Strauss & Co.
e-mail: mkobori@levi.com
asking Levi Strauss to insist that their contractor comply with internationally-recognised workers' rights, most especially the right to organise a union and bargain collectively. Furthermore, suggest that Levi?s should demand that the Haitian government give the SOKOWA union its legal registration, as required by law.

Remind him that Levi's has a responsibility to work with its supplier to resolve this matter in a way that brings it into compliance with accepted standards of freedom of association.

Background:
www.batayouvriye.org
www.haitisupport.gn.apc.org


______________________________________________


This email is forwarded as a service of the Haiti Support Group.

See the Haiti Support Group web site:
www.haitisupport.gn.apc.org

Solidarity with the Haitian people's struggle for justice, participatory democracy and equitable development, since 1992.
____________________________________________
 
T

TiberiusMineola

Guest
India? China? Bangeledesh?

I suspect that all of these jobs will ned up in the Orient w/i 12 - 18 months. The Haitian or Dominican unions should check with the American United Auto Workers before flexxing their Caribbean muscles. Millions of cars are now manufactured in the Orient, chiefly Japan & Korea. Before 1960: virtually none. There may be some lessons here?
 

Mirador

On Permanent Vacation!
Apr 15, 2004
3,563
0
0
I just came back from the deep south (toward Pedernales and back) and in all the town squares I could see throngs of people with handwritten signs that read: 'I work for food'.


Mirador
 

Narcosis

New member
Dec 18, 2003
387
0
0
CharlesArthur said:
Haiti Support Group press release, 14 June 2004

Grupo M has fired 301 workers at the Codevi free trade zone at Ouanaminthe.

Dominican soldiers have been brought in to terrorise the workers.

The management has threatened to close the factory down rather than negotiate on pay and conditions with the union.


Since the beginning of June there has been a dramatic deterioration in the situation at the Codevi free trade zone in north-east Haiti. Following an international campaign in support of the 34 union members sacked in early March, negotiations in April led to an agreement between management and workers. By mid-May, all the sacked workers were back to work but, on 4 June, a breach of the May agreement led to a one-hour warning strike. The following day, the head of the Grupo M company arrived at the Codevi plant to tell workers that the plant would probably be shut down because of the continuing labour unrest. Then, in the afternoon, after another dispute had developed when management forcibly removed the t-shirts and ID badges of a group of women, the management called in the Dominican Army to expel workers from the free trade zone.

A full one-day strike then took place on Monday, 7 June. Workers agreed to return to work on 8 June despite the continuing presence of the Dominican Army because the management had agreed to negotiate with the union. However, when the workers showed up to work at 5:30am, they found that they were locked-out.

On 9 June, Grupo M announced to the media that it was abandoning production at the Codevi free trade zone and laying off all 700 workers because of what it described as "security reasons in the face of threats and violent actions by a group of activists called Batay Ouvriye."

By the end of the week, half of the production units were closed down at Codevi and 254 workers had been arbitrarily dismissed - including the coordinator and secretary of the SOKOWA union. Over the weekend, the company started advertising new jobs at its assembly plant in Santiago, the Dominican Republic.


The actions of the Grupo M company are scandalous violations of internationally recognised workers' rights, and immediate protests must be registered.

Please send email now. Either use the form at LabourStart: http://www.labourstart.org/cgi-bin/solidarityforever/show_campaign.cgi?c=30

or write your own emails to:
Fernando Capellan, CEO of Grupo M
e-mail: fcapellan@grupom.com.do
telling him that Grupo M must immediately end the violence against workers;
that the Dominican Armed Forces must be immediately and permanently withdrawn from the Codevi FTZ;
that all management personnel found to have committed violent acts against workers must be disciplined;
that negotiations in good faith with SOKOWA and the Batay Ouvriye workers' organisation must begin;
that arbitrarily fired workers must be re-instated, and that threats to close the factory must cease.

Remind him of his obligation to respect workers’ rights under Haitian law, of the code of conduct of his client, Levi Strauss, and of the World Bank's loan conditions.


Please also write to:
Michael Kobori, Global Code of Conduct Director, Levi Strauss & Co.
e-mail: mkobori@levi.com
asking Levi Strauss to insist that their contractor comply with internationally-recognised workers' rights, most especially the right to organise a union and bargain collectively. Furthermore, suggest that Levi’s should demand that the Haitian government give the SOKOWA union its legal registration, as required by law.

Remind him that Levi's has a responsibility to work with its supplier to resolve this matter in a way that brings it into compliance with accepted standards of freedom of association.

Background:
www.batayouvriye.org
www.haitisupport.gn.apc.org


______________________________________________


This email is forwarded as a service of the Haiti Support Group.

See the Haiti Support Group web site:
www.haitisupport.gn.apc.org

Solidarity with the Haitian people's struggle for justice, participatory democracy and equitable development, since 1992.
____________________________________________

Classic example of hippocracy hard at work!

Hey Charles why don't you go lobby in China or Bangladesh and all those US products being manufactured over there?

This is what we get for investing in a country that has nothing! Out of nowhere you get a guy like this who probably has done NOTHING to really help Haitians or anyone for that matter. Don't worry that plant will probably close and a lesson learned, NO ONE else will be foolish enough to provide any jobs in Haiti. Thanks for a job well done.
 

Conchman

Silver
Jul 3, 2002
4,586
160
63
57
www.oceanworld.net
Just goes to show that most union officials (especially in the Caribbean) only care for their power and union dues (from which they pilfer), they couldn't give a damn if the plant closes and moves to another country, leaving hundreds of unemployed workers.
 

Pib

Goddess
Jan 1, 2002
3,668
20
38
www.dominicancooking.com
And why should I trust Haiti Support Group over Grupo M? I have no dog in this fight, and have no hopes that Grupo M is worse or better than any other for-profit company. I KNOW for a fact that they are fair employers in the D.R. so the balance is tilting towards believing them. So... can you please provide the credentials of the HSG so I can make an informed decission?

I would also like to know what where the demands made by the unions.
 

NALs

Economist by Profession
Jan 20, 2003
13,485
3,189
113
Pib said:
And why should I trust Haiti Support Group over Grupo M? I have no dog in this fight, and have no hopes that Grupo M is worse or better than any other for-profit company. I KNOW for a fact that they are fair employers in the D.R. so the balance is tilting towards believing them. So... can you please provide the credentials of the HSG so I can make an informed decission?

I would also like to know what where the demands made by the unions.

What I would like to know is under what conditions did the Haitian government attracted these companies there?

If the deal was to keep wages very low, then obviously the companies will refuse if the unions ask for higher wages! Globalization is a remarkable thing for corporations, all they can do is pick up their bags and go somewhere cheap with less hassles. Who knows, those companies might relocate their assembly lines to the Dominican side or to some other country!

People need to be much more aware of their actions. If a company invest in Haiti or DR, for the most part the cost of labor has a lot to do with it. If the cost of labor is going to go up by force, then the companies simply move. I guess the people at Juana Mendez would prefer either low pay or no work. Apparently, they are choosing no work. Its really too bad for them, the company will not be hurting and the Haitian government would not be hurting, at least until election times, and that is IF elections do take place!
 

johne

Silver
Jun 28, 2003
7,091
2,965
113
CharlesArthur said:
Haiti Support Group press release, 14 June 2004

Grupo M has fired 301 workers at the Codevi free trade zone at Ouanaminthe.

Dominican soldiers have been brought in to terrorise the workers.

The management has threatened to close the factory down rather than negotiate on pay and conditions with the union.


Since the beginning of June there has been a dramatic deterioration in the situation at the Codevi free trade zone in north-east Haiti. Following an international campaign in support of the 34 union members sacked in early March, negotiations in April led to an agreement between management and workers. By mid-May, all the sacked workers were back to work but, on 4 June, a breach of the May agreement led to a one-hour warning strike. The following day, the head of the Grupo M company arrived at the Codevi plant to tell workers that the plant would probably be shut down because of the continuing labour unrest. Then, in the afternoon, after another dispute had developed when management forcibly removed the t-shirts and ID badges of a group of women, the management called in the Dominican Army to expel workers from the free trade zone.

A full one-day strike then took place on Monday, 7 June. Workers agreed to return to work on 8 June despite the continuing presence of the Dominican Army because the management had agreed to negotiate with the union. However, when the workers showed up to work at 5:30am, they found that they were locked-out.

On 9 June, Grupo M announced to the media that it was abandoning production at the Codevi free trade zone and laying off all 700 workers because of what it described as "security reasons in the face of threats and violent actions by a group of activists called Batay Ouvriye."

By the end of the week, half of the production units were closed down at Codevi and 254 workers had been arbitrarily dismissed - including the coordinator and secretary of the SOKOWA union. Over the weekend, the company started advertising new jobs at its assembly plant in Santiago, the Dominican Republic.


The actions of the Grupo M company are scandalous violations of internationally recognised workers' rights, and immediate protests must be registered.

Please send email now. Either use the form at LabourStart: http://www.labourstart.org/cgi-bin/solidarityforever/show_campaign.cgi?c=30

or write your own emails to:
Fernando Capellan, CEO of Grupo M
e-mail: fcapellan@grupom.com.do
telling him that Grupo M must immediately end the violence against workers;
that the Dominican Armed Forces must be immediately and permanently withdrawn from the Codevi FTZ;
that all management personnel found to have committed violent acts against workers must be disciplined;
that negotiations in good faith with SOKOWA and the Batay Ouvriye workers' organisation must begin;
that arbitrarily fired workers must be re-instated, and that threats to close the factory must cease.

Remind him of his obligation to respect workers? rights under Haitian law, of the code of conduct of his client, Levi Strauss, and of the World Bank's loan conditions.


Please also write to:
Michael Kobori, Global Code of Conduct Director, Levi Strauss & Co.
e-mail: mkobori@levi.com
asking Levi Strauss to insist that their contractor comply with internationally-recognised workers' rights, most especially the right to organise a union and bargain collectively. Furthermore, suggest that Levi?s should demand that the Haitian government give the SOKOWA union its legal registration, as required by law.

Remind him that Levi's has a responsibility to work with its supplier to resolve this matter in a way that brings it into compliance with accepted standards of freedom of association.

Background:
www.batayouvriye.org
www.haitisupport.gn.apc.org


______________________________________________


This email is forwarded as a service of the Haiti Support Group.

See the Haiti Support Group web site:
www.haitisupport.gn.apc.org

Solidarity with the Haitian people's struggle for justice, participatory democracy and equitable development, since 1992.
____________________________________________
What are scandalous voilation of internationally recognized rights?? Since when are labor negociations, union organizing, plants moves, layoffs, governed by "international rights"? Do you know anything about Grupo M or are you solely a bleeding heart liberal that wants to transibe an article of news and turn it into your cause?
So--please answer my first question--no need to bother yourself with the rest of the questions as I already know the answers.

JOHN
 

Texas Bill

Silver
Feb 11, 2003
2,174
26
0
97
www.texasbill.com
Virtually EVERY SINGLE clothing manufacturer has moved OUT of the USA over the past 20 years. Where have they gone??? Dominican Republic, China, Taiwan, Indo China, India,ANY country which offers workers at lower wages than were paid in the USA.
WHY??? Because the leadership of the UNIONS convinced their constituency that it was their RIGHT to demand Profit sharing, Full health care costs, NON-contributary retirement benefits, and a myriad of other far-reaching liberal Socialist pronouncements!!!
THAT's WHY the clothing manufacturing industry, the Steel industry and many others, to numerous to list have moved to places where their BOTTOM LINE (the reason they're in business) will no longer suffer from such demands.
When Unions first began to be formed, they had a set of reasonable demands, vis-a-vis working conditions, a livable wage formulated to keep their heads above water in an incresingly expensive economy (not realising that their wage hikes were fueling that same phenomenon), but those actions were needed for the times; they have just gotten out of hand, fueled by the quest for power of Union Leaders in their efforts to perpetuate their tenure and to control the companies their constituents work for.
I might add that unskilled and semi-skilled labor has ALWAYS been on the lower end of the wage scales, yet these same types of earners have been convinced by their leaders that they are "skilled". After all they work on an assembly line where their sole function is to drive ONE headbolt into the block of an engine. That's "skilled"??? Yes, BY union definition.
So, in the final analysis, it is the UNIONS who have caused the loss of their OWN JOBS!!! AND no-one can LOGICALLY refute that without a lot of fallacious reasoning.
So, it seems to me that the original poster of this thread would fall into the category of being a "RABBLE ROUSER" of the first water since he did not list the union demands, nor the (his) reasons for demanding that management be disciplined. ALL he did was emit a lot of unsubstantiated retoric in an effort to gain attention and try to place the company in a bad light.

Texas Bill
 

Tony C

Silver
Jan 1, 2002
2,262
2
0
www.sfmreport.com
I know it might be a surprise to many of you but Groupo M does not exist to
Provide Jobs, Provide HealthCare, provide social engineering or Spread Wealth.
It exists for one reason. To MAKE MONEY!
They have no Dutyor Obligation to negotiate or even listen to any demands made by anyone or anything including a Union. They do have a duty to not violate any labor laws. But that is it. Now because of a group of selfish Closed-minded people there are 700 jobs lost!
 

CharlesArthur

New member
Nov 7, 2003
8
0
0
63
www.haitisupport.gn.apc.org
Haiti criticised at the ILO for labour rights abuses

FOR THE PRESS - FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE - ITGLWF
June 9 2004

HAITI CRITICISED AT ILO FOR LABOUR RIGHTS ABUSES

Labour rights abuses at the Grupo M Codevi plant in Ounaminthe were raised today in the plenary of the International Labour Conference in Geneva.

Neil Kearney, General Secretary of the International Textile, Garment and Leather Workers? Federation, said that the right to organise -a key human right- doesn?t exist in many nations, including Haiti.

?Governments are either too inefficient, too incompetent or too uncaring to enforce international labour standards or even their own often inadequate national labour legislation?.

?As a result?, said Mr Kearney, ?decent work is no more than a dream for millions employed in the global textile, clothing and footwear industries. An unrealisable dream in the face of falling wages, deteriorating working conditions and growing exploitation?.

Mr Kearney highlighted the plight of workers at the Grupo M factory in Ounaminthe, on the border between Haiti and the Dominican Republic: ?This week, workers at the Ouanaminthe Free Trade Zone are on strike because of inhuman treatment including violence, intimidation, harassment, forced stripping of women union leaders, beatings, kidnappings and non-payment of wages?.

?In a globalised interdependent world enforceable global rules on labour standards are essential and the international community must ensure that individual governments promote and enforce decent work, or otherwise forfeit their countries? access to world markets. That would make every government wake up to the current criminal neglect of worker rights in sectors like textiles, clothing and footwear in so many parts of the world. Then the dream of decent work could become a reality!? , concluded Mr. Kearney.

-end-

The International Textile, Garment and Leather Workers? Federation is a global union federation bringing together 225 affiliated organisations in 110 countries with a combined membership of 10 million workers.

For more information, contact:


ITGLWF Secretariat at tel: 32/02/512.26.06, fax: 32/02/511.09.04
Visit our website at www.itglwf.org
 
Last edited:

NALs

Economist by Profession
Jan 20, 2003
13,485
3,189
113
CharlesArthur said:
FOR THE PRESS - FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE - ITGLWF
June 9 2004

HAITI CRITICISED AT ILO FOR LABOUR RIGHTS ABUSES


?In a globalised interdependent world enforceable global rules on labour standards are essential and the international community must ensure that individual governments promote and enforce decent work, or otherwise forfeit their countries? access to world markets. That would make every government wake up to the current criminal neglect of worker rights in sectors like textiles, clothing and footwear in so many parts of the world. Then the dream of decent work could become a reality!? , concluded Mr. Kearney.

Hmm, this is odd in deed. So, Mr. Kearney wants for these globalised organizations to make sure Third World countries impose workers rights and if a country refuses he suggest creating a sort of blocade or embargo against that country's import/export habits. That's a good idea, but only when the samething would apply for first world government ensuring that their corporations do provide their third world factory workers livable wages, decent conditions and stuff. I don't think the problem of third world manufaturing centers should be fixed by Third World governments that WERE inefficient prior to globalization. If First World would have made the rules clearer regarding its corporation, regardless where the corporations operate, then much of the abuses in to workers around the world would not have happen.

Grupo M has done nothing wrong considering that they are just emulating stuff that First World companies like Nike, Tommy Hilfiger, and many others have been doing to third world sweat shops and workers for years. I said it before and I'll say it again, if people want change then they should ask the change from those who have the real power to do so. Third World countries try to emulate the First World. So how can the First World ask the Third World to do something differently than how the First World is already doing?

Also, Haiti is setting its self up for further decreasing in their megre job numbers. Apparently Haiti is going to learn the hard way that criticizing big business in the international sphere of things is a nice way of telling other multi-national to not go to Haiti, since there are at least 40 other countries as poor as Haiti or even poorer that would take those companies with little or no hassle. The hard way is not the way to learn things, especially when it will impact the lives of many people that would otherwise starve.
 

Pib

Goddess
Jan 1, 2002
3,668
20
38
www.dominicancooking.com
CharlesArthur, people like you give us heart-bleeding, tree-hugging, Birkenstock-wearing, Al Sharpton-lovers, Tony C-ulcer-givers liberals a bad name.

I have no business defending Grupo M, unless they see fit to pay me for the PR (after all we heart-bleeding liberals can also be bribed), but I will tell you what I know:

I have been to Grupo M factories more than once. I know people that work for them. I am aware of the many advantages that they offer to their employees in the D.R. Their employees here are paid within and above what the law mandates and work in good conditions.

Now, do I think that they have done that out of the goodness of their heart? I doubt it. Maybe whatshisname the president of Grupo M is a good citizen and believes in good corporate citizenship. But the fact is that due to the sweatshop scandals of some years ago big brands started DEMANDING that their manufacturers comply with a set of good treatment practices. I know because I heard it from the big boss' mouth at one of the biggest manufacturers in the D.R. These big brands regularly send inspectors to the factories to check that they comply with their Big Book of Rules of Stuff That Won't Give Them a Bad Name. Going to Haiti won't let Grupo M off the hook.

Now, do you think Grupo M would jeopardize a multi-million Dollars operation? No, unless they are terminally stupid. That is why I am giving them the benefit of the doubt. And while you don't tell us WHAT EXACTLY were the demands made by this so-called union I will not believe you.

Funny enough, even in the Dominican Rep. I trust the Big Evil Corporation more than I trust union leaders.
 
Last edited:

Narcosis

New member
Dec 18, 2003
387
0
0
CharlesArthur said:
FOR THE PRESS - FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE - ITGLWF
June 9 2004

HAITI CRITICISED AT ILO FOR LABOUR RIGHTS ABUSES

Labour rights abuses at the Grupo M Codevi plant in Ounaminthe were raised today in the plenary of the International Labour Conference in Geneva.

Neil Kearney, General Secretary of the International Textile, Garment and Leather Workers’ Federation, said that the right to organise -a key human right- doesn’t exist in many nations, including Haiti.

“Governments are either too inefficient, too incompetent or too uncaring to enforce international labour standards or even their own often inadequate national labour legislation”.

“As a result”, said Mr Kearney, “decent work is no more than a dream for millions employed in the global textile, clothing and footwear industries. An unrealisable dream in the face of falling wages, deteriorating working conditions and growing exploitation”.

Mr Kearney highlighted the plight of workers at the Grupo M factory in Ounaminthe, on the border between Haiti and the Dominican Republic: “This week, workers at the Ouanaminthe Free Trade Zone are on strike because of inhuman treatment including violence, intimidation, harassment, forced stripping of women union leaders, beatings, kidnappings and non-payment of wages”.

“In a globalised interdependent world enforceable global rules on labour standards are essential and the international community must ensure that individual governments promote and enforce decent work, or otherwise forfeit their countries’ access to world markets. That would make every government wake up to the current criminal neglect of worker rights in sectors like textiles, clothing and footwear in so many parts of the world. Then the dream of decent work could become a reality!” , concluded Mr. Kearney.

-end-

The International Textile, Garment and Leather Workers’ Federation is a global union federation bringing together 225 affiliated organisations in 110 countries with a combined membership of 10 million workers.

For more information, contact:


ITGLWF Secretariat at tel: 32/02/512.26.06, fax: 32/02/511.09.04
Visit our website at www.itglwf.org


Looks to me like some union leaders stateside may be worried Haiti may attract more Grupo M type operations which are very competative to Asian wage scales minus the higher cost of transporting goods to US markets.

Charles are you willing to disclose where you get funding for your campaign?
 

Dolores1

DR1
May 3, 2000
8,215
37
48
www.
Read in El Caribe today that the minimum wages paid by Grupo M at their Ouanaminthe plant are double the minimum wage in effect in Haiti today.
 

Jerry K

New member
Jan 1, 2002
285
2
0
Grupo

The verdict is in, the jury rules, screw Charles Arthur and the poppy he rode in on. At least Grupo M had the balls to take a chance and build a factory in Haiti.
Texas Bill is right on target. There was a time the unions were needed to protect the rights of the workers. Now you can't fart without the permission of the shop stewart.
 

CharlesArthur

New member
Nov 7, 2003
8
0
0
63
www.haitisupport.gn.apc.org
Clothing company Grupo M continues union-busting in defiance of investors

Haiti: Clothing company Grupo M continues union-busting in defiance of investors

Brussels 17 June 2004 (ICFTU Online): After ducking efforts by the local Haitian union, Sokowa, to address a series of grievances, Grupo M, a Dominican Republic-based company, has precipitated a strike, organized a lock-out of the workforce, and has finally fired more than half its employees at the Ouanaminthe plant, which manufactures jeans for Levi?s. The International Confederation of Free Trade Unions is protesting against another attempt at union-busting on the part of one of the biggest textile companies in the Caribbean, by calling on the World Bank to intercede in favour of the laid off Haitian workers.

The events in recent days have led to a storm of international protest at the company?s recurrent abuses of workers. According to Neil Kearney, General Secretary of the International Textile, Garment and Leather Workers? Federation (ITGLWF), workers? were protesting at the Ouanaminthe Free Trade Zone in Haiti ?because of inhuman treatment including violence, intimidation, harassment, forced stripping of women union leaders, beatings, kidnappings and non-payment of wages?.

The plant in question was built using a $20-million loan from the International Finance Corporation (IFC), the World Bank's private-sector lending arm. A one-day strike on Monday June 7 ended in an agreement between Grupo M and Sokowa for a return to work and the start of negotiations to address workers? grievances. The following day Grupo M locked out the workforce and announced by letter the closure of their jeans factory in Ouanaminthe. On the Wednesday, the letter was partially rescinded, and the company restarted production, but on Friday, in another apparent ?U-turn?, it was announced that the firm was laying off 254 workers. However according to the Sokowa union, 370 workers (around 60% of the workforce) have been sacked.

While Grupo M claimed to be laying off the workers temporarily, it emerged that they were being pressured to accept severance payments at the same time, which the company may try to use as a pretext to make the dismissals permanent. ?The sacking of the workers was an effort to retaliate against them for their strike, and was discriminatorily aimed at the union leaders. All but one of the union's executive committee members have been fired,? said ICFTU General Secretary Guy Ryder.

While the IFC has proposed mediation between Grupo M and the union, such efforts are likely to remain futile so long as 370 workers have been fired and do not know if they have any chance of being rehired. The ICFTU has sent a letter to the acting President of Haiti, Alexandre Boniface, demanding the immediate rehiring of the workers by Grupo M and the start of serious negotiations with the union. It is also calling on the IFC to withhold its loan payments until production is restored at the Haitian plant.

Grupo M is a particularly abusive employer. According to information received by the ITGLWF, Grupo M CEO Fernando Capellan started threatening to fire factory workers as early as June 3, saying that the factory was suffering several million dollars in losses because of lack of productivity. The same day managers ?summoned four women workers into what is called the 'dark room', locked the door and posted Dominican guards outside. Under the threat of weapons, the women were subjected to a police-style interrogation. Their factory badges and work shirts were ripped off of them, leaving the women topless. After they had been in the room for nearly two hours, their co-workers grew worried and started to approach the room, shouting for the workers to be let out. The guards posted outside the room summoned back up. A truck full of guards arrived. The guards aimed their weapons at the workers, ordering them to back off behind a line traced on the ground with a rifle. A four-month pregnant woman was thrown to the floor, in a pool of mud, her dress torn.?

According to Ryder, ?It is vital that the World Bank?s IFC step in and ensure that these Haitian workers, who are in a desperately poor situation, get their jobs back as soon as possible and be allowed to work under humane conditions. In view of Grupo M?s obligations in the loan agreement it signed, the IFC should suspend disbursements on the loan until the workers are rehired and a serious process of negotiations has begun with union to address the workers? grievances?. Last January, following earlier submissions by the ICFTU on the company?s labour rights abuses, the IFC agreed to make its US$20-million loan to Grupo M conditional on the company?s respect for the freedom of association and right to collective bargaining of its employees.


The ICFTU represents 151 million workers in 233 affiliated organisations in 152 countries and territories. ICFTU is also a member of Global Unions: http://www.global-unions.org
 

Hillbilly

Moderator
Jan 1, 2002
18,948
514
113
the BIG LIE--Repeat it enough times

that is a crock of doggy doodie.
Batey Ouvrie is not a recognized union in Haiti or anywhere else.

What do you want? For them to pull out?

Go ask the people of Manzanillo how they lived 40 years ago before "unions" began making demands.

The only benefits of unions is that the union leaders ride around in Lexus and Mercedes...
They come and the jobs are going to China.

Do you have a few million to invest in Haiti? If you do please feel free to set up a factory and then get contracts and then get production....oh yeah!

there were 254 workers let go-with all the correct proceedures-- for not producing. Remember Haitians have seldom had a work situation such as what Grupo M has installed.

Do you know that if your 50,000 pairs of khakis are just one day late to Wal-Mart, the order has been cancelled and you can take your pants and shove them up your lying....butt! they don't care. The Chinese deliver on time, the Guatamalans deliver on time the Dominicans deliver on time.

This was a tremendous gamble for Grupo M. It was supposed to make money, create jobs and in general imporve the situation for the entire Ounamenthe area.

HB
 

Texas Bill

Silver
Feb 11, 2003
2,174
26
0
97
www.texasbill.com
You so-called union "leaders" actually make me sick with all your whining about the "poor down-trodden worker"!
All you ever do is sit back and listen to a bunch of lazy whining no-goods that think, because they belong to a union, they can force a company to do their will, do very little work and still get paid for "putting in their time"!
Maybe if a few of you were AACTUALLY trying to make money with a very competetive business and had to watch your bottom line shrinking day by day because of slowdowns created by lazy workers who you would be better off without, you'd think and act a little differently. But since you probably couldn't make it in management, you sponge off people who work for living and then talk them into striking so you can take a bigger cut of their wages.
You're all a bunch of blood-sucking leeches and have outlived your usefulness to society.
On top of all that, you have NEVER ONCE stated what the so-called "collective bargaining" was supposed to be all about.
As is your usual retoric, you make a lot of outrageous remarks without giving a shred of evidence.
So why don't you go whine someplace else. We're not the least bit interested.

Texas Bill
 

johne

Silver
Jun 28, 2003
7,091
2,965
113
Amen

Texas Bill said:
You so-called union "leaders" actually make me sick with all your whining about the "poor down-trodden worker"!
All you ever do is sit back and listen to a bunch of lazy whining no-goods that think, because they belong to a union, they can force a company to do their will, do very little work and still get paid for "putting in their time"!
Maybe if a few of you were AACTUALLY trying to make money with a very competetive business and had to watch your bottom line shrinking day by day because of slowdowns created by lazy workers who you would be better off without, you'd think and act a little differently. But since you probably couldn't make it in management, you sponge off people who work for living and then talk them into striking so you can take a bigger cut of their wages.
You're all a bunch of blood-sucking leeches and have outlived your usefulness to society.
On top of all that, you have NEVER ONCE stated what the so-called "collective bargaining" was supposed to be all about.
As is your usual retoric, you make a lot of outrageous remarks without giving a shred of evidence.
So why don't you go whine someplace else. We're not the least bit interested.

Texas Bill
Amen--well said and nothing more to say to Mr. Charles so and so .

JOHN