Nal0whs said:Good: Sharing information with people.
Bad: Reading misinformation people post as facts!
And you? What do you like/hate the most of DR1?
-NAL
Ouch !Scandall said:Good: People who are concise and make their points quickly.
Bad: People who babble endlessly to make their point.
Scandall
Nal0whs said:Good: Sharing information with people.
Bad: Reading misinformation people post as facts!
And you? What do you like/hate the most of DR1?
-NAL
Kiwi, this thread is not meant to be a debate. This thread I made for people to share their opinions on what they like best and worst of this site.Kiwicanuck said:Lets look at the bad, 'reading misinformation people post as fact'.
If people state that its in there opinion ( IMHO or IMO ) isn't that a fair qualifier that they are just stating it how they see it.
Do you ( Nal ) feel that if they don't qualify it then you feel they are stating it as a 'fact'.
Don't we as the reader of a 'post' have the responsibility to interpret it how we feel fit. Doesn't this whole question fall into the hazards of reading a 'message board' and really is unavoidable.
I am curious tho how you (Nal ) feel about a post whether it has a IMO qualifier in it or not. Does that determine how much respect you are going to feel towards the poster ?
That's my feed back.
Kiwi Bruce
What would you say the OP's original post is?Scandall said:Good: People who are concise and make their points quickly.
Bad: People who babble endlessly to make their point.
Scandall
Nal0whs said:Kiwi, this thread is not meant to be a debate. This thread I made for people to share their opinions on what they like best and worst of this site.
However, I will answer you question this one time. I will not follow up, but if you want a follow up, simply PM me.
When people state misinformation (ie. claim something that is incorrect, they are corrected by other members and the person continues to claim the incorrect assumption), it does lowers the quality of the site because from that point forward a thread goes from being a learning experience to a test of who can be more persuasive.
-NAL
Nal0whs said:What would you say the OP's original post is?
Concise or babble? :surprised
-NAL:classic:
I agree, but until Robert adds one, use the Google Toolbar:Kiwicanuck said:Thanks The bad is not having a spell-check built into the board.
Nal0whs said:Good: Sharing information with people.
Bad: Reading misinformation people post as facts!
And you? What do you like/hate the most of DR1?
-NAL
Anna Coniglio said:We do have one now. It's on the right side when you're in the reply window. I had to download it the first time but it's there forever now.