Has right to appeals, sympathy a tough sell
I had never heard of the case before. Here are the details from the court:
http://www.supreme.state.az.us/opin/pdf2005/CR030199AP.pdf
And short newspaper article about the case:
Fabio Evelio Gomez
TheHun and windeguy: the death sentence is obviously the most severe, irrevocable punishment. The justice system is not perfect. Innocent people have been executed. DNA testing has revealed that some on death row were actually innocent. The costs related to them being on death row mostly come from the appeals process, and given the state and history of the justice system and the errors is has and does make, the right to appeals cannot be taken away.
I am ashamed and saddened that the U.S. still uses the death penalty. It is not objective, just, efficient or effective, any way you want to look at it. I am glad that the appeals system is in place and respect Fabio Gomez' right to use it, no matter how much it costs. Want to save taxpayer money? Abolish the death penalty.
I do not believe he should be executed because I do not support the death penalty-not morally and not from a criminological perspective.
However, these efforts being made at gaining public sympathy for him seem futile. Despite the overwheliming evidence against him, he has yet to admit any level of guilt or express any remorse. The crime was brutal; the woman was bludgeoned 18+ times in the head with a dumb bell and thrown in a dumpster. I do not feel any sympathy for him because he was a PELOTERO, from any league or team, or because is DOMINICAN. I don't care. He could be a Haitian crackhead, a rich Mexican oil tycoon, it doesn't matter in terms of me feeling more or less sorry for them or placing more or less value on their life. It's shameful that people are trying to use a few of his random charitable acts or the fact that he played baseball to drum up sympathy.
This is not the kind of case to use to try to get public support for abolishing the death penalty, which is probably why you can't find too much talk about it other than in the Dominican press.