It was Bond's 5th yr before he hit 30hr in a year.....by that time Pujols had 5, 30 hr seasons, going on for 12 in a row....No player has ever done this feat, not even Bonds.....and isn't this about Dominican players.....
It was Bond's 5th yr before he hit 30hr in a year.....by that time Pujols had 5, 30 hr seasons, going on for 12 in a row....No player has ever done this feat, not even Bonds.....and isn't this about Dominican players.....
Overall, both player and coach, I have to put Felipe Alou's name on the table.
He played when baseball was very different, no steroids, no juiced ball, not a lot of TV, not a lot of $$$, pre-expansion (diluted pitching pool) and no DH.
(I'm Old School.)
For me, best pitcher was Pedro.
Best hitter and present player, for me, is Pujols.
Though I do like Cano.
I consider A-rod to be from the US system, so unless the question is open to anyone of Dominican decent, as opposed to having been a part of the Dominican baseball system - then I do not factor A-rod in.
And, I am not old enough to have seen Juan or the older players, so I only know them from stats in the history books.
Nothing against Pujols at all.What would you say are the negatives about Pujol's or do you believe the ball as it is now makes it too easy to hit homeruns?
I played baseball in college. Lot's of guys threw in the 80's+. I pitched and could. Well, I think they could; we didn't have radar guns in the early-70's (Tino Martinez is an alumni of the same school, 15 years after me.)I ask because if a kid hasn't grown up with baseball and used to seeing pitches thrown at him, very often wild at that, chances are he won't last long if his first time at bat is in front of a pitcher who hit's 80 - especially since a lot of times the kids that get get to this velocity have little control. All it takes is for someone to get beaned and they'll never develop the "eye" needed for seeing pitches.