It was stuffed in a tight space that needs air circulation for the equipment....
The ground crew found it....
The ground crew found it....
As you previously posted, other staff inside the airport were probably involved.
The ground crew found it....
That's correct based upon the article Bob posted:It said "a maintenance worker who was part of the crew" found it. By this I read that the person was flying on the plane.
"The airline did not identify the detained aircrew but said it includes the captain, first officer, two cabin crew, and a maintenance engineer."https://www.therecord.com/news/wate...e-it-begins-flights-from-waterloo-region.html It seems the aircrew discovered the drugs and reported it to the Dominican authorities.![]()
Canadian airline seeks ‘safe return’ of detained aircrew after big cocaine bust in the Dominican Republic
Pivot Airlines plans to begin flying this summer out of Waterloo airportwww.therecord.com
Maybe, but not necessarily. Charter airlines frequently contract out ground services. Baggage handlers are often involved.You can't help feeling sorry for the air crew, if you can believe that they really didn't know, it would be a horrible situation for them. But clearly someone who works for that airline knows something, someone would have been waiting to remove 200kg of cocaine from that plane when it landed and someone put it there.
Remember the French guys not too long ago. They were just convicted in these days. Canadian pilots, I wonder if they were French CanadianMaybe, but not necessarily. Charter airlines frequently contract out ground services. Baggage handlers are often involved.
Yes. They were in preventative custody for a long time here. Can't remember if they were convicted here, but they managed to escape somehow back to France where they were convicted.Remember the French guys not too long ago. They were just convicted in these days. Canadian pilots, I wonder if they were French Canadian
Madame DeFarge's work continues folks
They were smart, arrogant French pilots. They drank Chablis and Cabernet. Now, not so much.Yes. They were in preventative custody for a long time here. Can't remember if they were convicted here, but they managed to escape somehow back to France where they were convicted.
Carlo Rossi in a box?They were smart, arrogant French pilots. They drank Chablis and Cabernet. Now, not so much.
Kinda like Airbus.
You know the French, nothing but the best Clark!Carlo Rossi in a box?
Yes. They were in preventative custody for a long time here. Can't remember if they were convicted here, but they managed to escape somehow back to France where they were convicted.
The aircraft was leased to Air Canada for a number of years and probably logged a large amount of hours. It’s not unusual for an airframe and engine tech to ride along on long trips if a free seat is available on older charter aircraft. If he did find the drugs stashed in the aircraft access compartments, it would lend some credibility to their innocence plea. The aircraft stopover would have allowed refuelers, luggage loaders, etc. the opportunity to stash the drugs in the various compartments. The risk of inflight problems would have been high. The seizure may have inadvertently saved the lives of the flight crew.That's correct based upon the article Bob posted:
"The airline did not identify the detained aircrew but said it includes the captain, first officer, two cabin crew, and a maintenance engineer."
Madame Lafarge sat quietly and knitted while the heads of French Royalty were severed by the guillotine according to Dickens. The guillotine has to be one of the best French inventions for mass executions. Efficient and quick and almost humane in a strange sort of way.Remember the French guys not too long ago. They were just convicted in these days. Canadian pilots, I wonder if they were French Canadian
Madame DeFarge's work continues folks
Ok. I guess that's Canadian terminology then. Do pilots on Canadian commercial flights say - Welcome aboard. This is the senior pilot speaking?Yes. When I say chief pilot I’m referring to the one in charge of the aircraft. The Senior pilot is the term I use to refer to the management pilot in charge of certification and training of all the pilots on staff.
The latest report that some of the drugs were stuffed in the avionic bay makes me doubt the pilots were involved. That area can get very hot as it is. Pilots are well aware of the danger of fire in the avionics bay. No pilot would stuff drugs in there and block airflow. They probably were having some indication of a problem with the avionics and sent the maintenance engineer onboard to check it out. The fact that they were hidden like that tells me it was done the night before.The law in most countries dictates that anyone involved in the commission of a crime has potentially aided and abetted the crime until proven innocent. Reporting that the drugs were on board is part of their proof on innocence but it doesn’t clear them of all of their legal responsibilities. If any of the pilots knew what was on board, reporting it may have been a desperate action to protect themselves once they knew the police were alerted or tipped off. The legal precept that ignorance is not a defence also applies here. Probably more so in drug related crimes of this magnitude.
Anything is possible, but I read the aircraft was here for three days. No drug dealer is going to want those drugs sitting in the aircraft for three days.Do you think the bags were loaded on the aircraft here in DR? Or loaded on at a prior stop (since the article mentioned that the plane has been doing a bit of flying throughout the Caribbean)?
Wouldn't CCTV at the airport capture the route of the bags from the arrival to their loading onto the plane? See who's hands it touched and start questioning thereAnything is possible, but I read the aircraft was here for three days. No drug dealer is going to want those drugs sitting in the aircraft for three days.
I have a feeling it arrived at the airport disguised as something else and the security camera on the ramp was inexplicably inop for a short time.Wouldn't CCTV at the airport capture the route of the bags from the arrival to their loading onto the plane? See who's hands it touched and start questioning there