Disclaimer; The use of the words (Dominican or Dominicans) does not refer to all Dominicans and is used here because this board is about the Dominican Republic. It is understood that these same problems are experienced and are present in all parts of the world but as this is about the DR then that is the object of the discussion taking place.
The act of corruption in the DR is an inbreed, taught and therefore learned
procedure, i.e., cultural. It is in fact an act of stealing which brings up the question as to why the Dominicans who commit these acts feel no remorse and believe it is okay to do such.
It all revolves around the definition you give to the word stealing. If we define the act of stealing as the taking of someone's property without that person's permission then we see that society does indeed condone stealing all the time. Taxation takes from us, under threat of force, if necessary, some of our property. To say that it is right, and therefore not stealing, is to ignore the fact that the same activity (taking someone's property against his or her will) is seen in some circumstances to be right, and in other circumstances to be wrong.
It is my contention that Dominicans use this same methodology in their dealings of corruption, stealing, because they consider it to be right and therefore not stealing.
Having said that then the question arises as to how these Dominicans can be taught or convinced that their actions of corruption are if fact wrong and go against society as a whole?
Rick
The act of corruption in the DR is an inbreed, taught and therefore learned
procedure, i.e., cultural. It is in fact an act of stealing which brings up the question as to why the Dominicans who commit these acts feel no remorse and believe it is okay to do such.
It all revolves around the definition you give to the word stealing. If we define the act of stealing as the taking of someone's property without that person's permission then we see that society does indeed condone stealing all the time. Taxation takes from us, under threat of force, if necessary, some of our property. To say that it is right, and therefore not stealing, is to ignore the fact that the same activity (taking someone's property against his or her will) is seen in some circumstances to be right, and in other circumstances to be wrong.
It is my contention that Dominicans use this same methodology in their dealings of corruption, stealing, because they consider it to be right and therefore not stealing.
Having said that then the question arises as to how these Dominicans can be taught or convinced that their actions of corruption are if fact wrong and go against society as a whole?
Rick