Cracking down on La Altagracia drug trafficking network

Dolores

Administrator
Staff member
Feb 20, 2019
17,259
2,734
93
Operacion-Rana-N-Digital-1024x605.png


The Specialized Prosecutor’s Office for the Prevention of Money Laundering and Terrorism Financing has seized property valued at over RD$6 million and firearms during simultaneous raids targeting a dismantled drug trafficking network, identified in July 2024 as part of Operation Rana that cracked down on the so-called La Altagracia Narcotics Network.

The operation involved a team from the Public Ministry, including prosecutors Claudio Alberto Cordero Jiménez, Hitler Stalin Sánchez, and José Manuel Calzado, along with members of the Asset Seizure and Administration Directorate and the Financial Investigation and Money Laundering Directorate (DIFLA), as well as the National Drug Control Agency (DNCD). The raids were conducted under judicial orders against the criminal organization.

The properties targeted belonged to Rigoberto Castillo Santana, who, along with José Padua...

Continue reading...
 
Last edited by a moderator:

CristoRey

Welcome To Wonderland
Apr 1, 2014
12,578
8,837
113
Having had the unique experience of living in a real Dominican barrio,
arguably one of the most well-known in the country, I learned a lot about
drug trafficking and drug sales during my time there by speaking with locals.
From what I was told back then, the military controlled the import side and
the police controlled the points of sale. Whether or not this still the case is indeed a mystery.
Compared to the last administration, this administration is making tons more
in drug seizures. (which I think is fantastic)
La Altagracia drug trafficking network included, why is that?
 

windeguy

Platinum
Jul 10, 2004
43,047
6,452
113
At the end of the day, when all is said and done, the bottom line is there will be no shortage of drugs.
Someone else will step up to keep the supply line flowing. So much money to be made in the war on drugs.
There is no mystery as to why the corruption will continue forever and ever, and that is a long time.
 

bob saunders

Platinum
Jan 1, 2002
33,296
6,695
113
dr1.com
Having had the unique experience of living in a real Dominican barrio,
arguably one of the most well-known in the country, I learned a lot about
drug trafficking and drug sales during my time there by speaking with locals.
From what I was told back then, the military controlled the import side and
the police controlled the points of sale. Whether or not this still the case is indeed a mystery.
Compared to the last administration, this administration is making tons more
in drug seizures. (which I think is fantastic)
La Altagracia drug trafficking network included, why is that?
 

La Profe_1

Moderator: Daily Headline News, Travel & Tourism
Oct 15, 2003
2,418
973
113
Please remember that DR law is very strict about libel. Generalized comments that imply wrongdoing without proof of such can bring about legal penalties. Sometimes generally believed information is better not posted on a public forum.
 
  • Wow
Reactions: CristoRey

windeguy

Platinum
Jul 10, 2004
43,047
6,452
113
Please remember that DR law is very strict about libel. Generalized comments that imply wrongdoing without proof of such can bring about legal penalties. Sometimes generally believed information is better not posted on a public forum.
There is plenty of proof every week of "wrong doing". It is in the news all the time. If you want more proof, just wait until the next news article which is forthcoming any minute now.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CristoRey

CristoRey

Welcome To Wonderland
Apr 1, 2014
12,578
8,837
113
Please remember that DR law is very strict about libel. Generalized comments that imply wrongdoing without proof of such can bring about legal penalties. Sometimes generally believed information is better not posted on a public forum.
I have notice that news articles involving suspected military involvement and police involvement in
the drugs trade seem to get removed from the internet/ suppressed rather quickly.

Does anyone remember the incident where an individual "of authority" turned off a radar system at
an airport to facilitate the arrival of an airplane from abroad suspected of transporting drugs?
It happened in San Pedro de Macorís if my memory serves me correct. Whatever happened to those guys?

Does anyone remember an incident that happened a few years ago down in (i think) Barahona involving
several P.N. and infighting among them over kilos of cocaine? One of the individuals involved was the
daughter of a high ranking officer. Zero follow up in the news. Whatever happened to those guys?

There are plenty of incidents that have happened over the last decade.

The truth hurts.

History doesn't lie.

 
  • Like
Reactions: windeguy

CristoRey

Welcome To Wonderland
Apr 1, 2014
12,578
8,837
113
Please remember that DR law is very strict about libel. Generalized comments that imply wrongdoing without proof of such can bring about legal penalties. Sometimes generally believed information is better not posted on a public forum.
If you feel my previous post may be considered "libel" then feel free to remove it as this was certainly not my intent.
 
  • Like
Reactions: windeguy

AlterEgo

Administrator
Staff member
Jan 9, 2009
23,745
7,134
113
South Coast
I have notice that news articles involving suspected military involvement and police involvement in
the drugs trade seem to get removed from the internet/ suppressed rather quickly.

Does anyone remember the incident where an individual "of authority" turned off a radar system at
an airport to facilitate the arrival of an airplane from abroad suspected of transporting drugs?
It happened in San Pedro de Macorís if my memory serves me correct. Whatever happened to those guys?

Does anyone remember an incident that happened a few years ago down in (i think) Barahona involving
several P.N. and infighting among them over kilos of cocaine? One of the individuals involved was the
daughter of a high ranking officer. Zero follow up in the news. Whatever happened to those guys?

There are plenty of incidents that have happened over the last decade.

The truth hurts.

History doesn't lie.


I can tell you what happened to Percival Matos. He died in a hail a bullets.
 
  • Wow
Reactions: CristoRey

La Profe_1

Moderator: Daily Headline News, Travel & Tourism
Oct 15, 2003
2,418
973
113
To all those who are claiming "everyone knows" - my reminder was prompted by a since-deleted comment alleging that Abinidar was culpable in the the corruption that existed before his first term in office.

It is not a good look for DR1 to permit such unsubstiated charges against the president.

¿Me entiende ahora?
 
  • Wow
Reactions: CristoRey

USA DOC

Bronze
Feb 20, 2016
3,304
845
113
To all those who are claiming "everyone knows" - my reminder was prompted by a since-deleted comment alleging that Abinidar was culpable in the the corruption that existed before his first term in office.

It is not a good look for DR1 to permit such unsubstiated charges against the president.

¿Me entiende ahora?
Its hard for one to outrun their Demons,,,,,,,,,,,,
 

bob saunders

Platinum
Jan 1, 2002
33,296
6,695
113
dr1.com
To all those who are claiming "everyone knows" - my reminder was prompted by a since-deleted comment alleging that Abinidar was culpable in the the corruption that existed before his first term in office.

It is not a good look for DR1 to permit such unsubstiated charges against the president.

¿Me entiende ahora?
My comment that you deleted was not directed at your hero Abinader, but at his government, after all two members of his government were running a money laundering/drug money scheme and were arrested. There is no shortage of drugs on the street here, so the various large drugs busts haven't dented the supply. Several others posts that were not removed were much more critical of the powers in this country.
 
  • Wow
Reactions: windeguy

La Profe_1

Moderator: Daily Headline News, Travel & Tourism
Oct 15, 2003
2,418
973
113
Bob, back off a bit. I'm not a citizen of the DR, so I am careful to stay out of politics. Therefore, I have no heroes in the political arena

I deleted your comment because you named the President of the DR in relation to the involvement of government employees in the drug trade. DR 1 doesn't need to be involved in a lawsuit because of defamation of the president.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: AlterEgo

bob saunders

Platinum
Jan 1, 2002
33,296
6,695
113
dr1.com
Bob, back off a bit. I'm not a citizen of the DR, so I am careful to stay out of politics. Therefore, I have no heroes in the political arena

I deleted your comment because you named the President of the DR in relation to the involvement of government employees in the drug trade. DR 1 doesn't need to be involved in a lawsuit because of defamation of the president.
I am a citizen. Did I use his name in my original statement? I don't believe so.
 

Big

Well-known member
Apr 24, 2019
5,475
4,646
113
To all those who are claiming "everyone knows" - my reminder was prompted by a since-deleted comment alleging that Abinidar was culpable in the the corruption that existed before his first term in office.

It is not a good look for DR1 to permit such unsubstiated charges against the president.

¿Me entiende ahora?
its not often, but I agree with you.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: El Hijo de Manolo

El Hijo de Manolo

It's outrageous, egregious, preposterous!
Dec 10, 2021
4,963
3,221
113
Dominican Republic
I remain surprised with builder's remarks. As a citizen with his vast global experience, expertise and intimate knowledge of all things Dominican, he clearly should be aware of the differences between O Canada, US and DR when it comes to the law and rights.

For those that may feel La Profe is dramatizing the issue a bit, let me remind the lay folks that defamation and/or injury in the Dominican Republic, while similarities with US law, there are key differences in how damages or harm must be proven. Unlike the US where proving tangible harm (such as financial or relational damage) is typically essential, Dominican law focuses primarily on whether the defamatory statement harmed the reputation or honor of the individual. Specifically, in the DR, to prove defamation or slander it is sufficient to show that the defendant's statements harmed the reputation, honor, or dignity of the plaintiff, regardless of whether there were measurable impacts on their livelihood, income, or relationships. In the D of R, they focus on moral harm (think Dominican overinflated pride) over tangible harm in defamation cases. Thus, a person bringing a defamation case is not necessarily required to prove economic loss, as the damage to one’s reputation (read as: Dominican pride) is often viewed as injurious under the law.

Sources
re: criminal prosecution: Article 367 Dom penal code, Law 6132.

In the even of a civil case, the more proof the better, especially when seeking financial restitution: Articles 1382, 3 of the Dom civil code.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DrNoob

CristoRey

Welcome To Wonderland
Apr 1, 2014
12,578
8,837
113
Specifically, in the DR, to prove defamation or slander it is sufficient to show that the defendant's statements harmed the reputation, honor, or dignity of the plaintiff, regardless of whether there were measurable impacts on their livelihood, income, or relationships. In the D of R, they focus on moral harm (think Dominican overinflated pride) over tangible harm in defamation cases. Thus, a person bringing a defamation case is not necessarily required to prove economic loss, as the damage to one’s reputation (read as: Dominican pride) is often viewed as injurious under the law.
I honestly don't think it's possible to overstate how sensitive most Dominican men are.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JD Jones