I have been retired in the DR since 2003. I have all the time in the world not having to report to anyone since then.
I see that you don't understand what a logical fallacy is. A logical fallacy has nothing to to with the law, but instead is an improper thought process leading to erroneous conclusions. There is always time to learn something new, like how to think without using logical fallacy as a basis for conclusions as you do.
I fully understand what a logical fallacy is, and it's reference or definition plays no part within this thread line regarding "Crime in the DR", nor my prior assertion towards you regarding a court of law. The court of law reference was inserted due to the fact that most of your retaliatory postings resemble arguments that would be entered into the record by junior associates of DLA Piper and Clifford Chance, and my reluctance to participate within such contests of absolute boredom.
But yet, once again, you miss the point of an assertion because you can only see the world through your
, which of course is your prerogative. As a person who has been sitting around for 18 years with not much to do, watching the sun rise and sun set every day could become stale after a while. This is understood, and is why I choose to keep myself busy. Thank goodness for Al Gore's internet.
I would love to continue, but time for me to catch a bird.
Enjoy your day, as you so see fit.