How many? BTW please include your sources and verifiable data as back up. TIA.Do you know how many lives have been saved because people took this pandemic seriously or better yet do you care?
How many? BTW please include your sources and verifiable data as back up. TIA.Do you know how many lives have been saved because people took this pandemic seriously or better yet do you care?
thick as s...t...typical !"the curfew is important"??? Oh yea it is not possible to spread the Wuhan Virus between the hours of 9pm - 5 am M-F and 7pm and 5 am Sat and Sun. It is amazing how the health experts recognized the 2 extra hours per day that the virus can't be transmitted. The closures /curfews have negatively effected much more of the population than the virus.
Open everything now! NO curfews!, elderly and those with pre-existing conditions take extra care.
This isn't hard to figure out. Before the curfew there was over 2,000 cases a day and the hospitals were collapsing. After the implementation of the curfew the daily numbers are around 300 cases a day. The evidence is clear whether you like it or not. Men lie women lie numbers don't."the curfew is important"??? Oh yea it is not possible to spread the Wuhan Virus between the hours of 9pm - 5 am M-F and 7pm and 5 am Sat and Sun. It is amazing how the health experts recognized the 2 extra hours per day that the virus can't be transmitted. The closures /curfews have negatively effected much more of the population than the virus.
Open everything now! NO curfews!, elderly and those with pre-existing conditions take extra care.
A vaccine is not going to be available for about 2 years according to medical experts. Availability will be this year according to non-experts.Totally agree with NanSanPedro. I also think the reason why we saw hospitals overloaded and politicians screaming for 30,000+ ventilators was panic and nothing more.
Even once a vaccine is available its not going to be 100%. None ever are. It will help slow the spread but covid will always be with us. We can't shut the world down because of it.
I had been going with a 0.5% fatality rate (1 in 200) of those infected (not reported cases, but estimates of those infected) from early on in this pandemic. It seems it is much less than that.
Or you could just say that flattening the curve does no necessarily reduce the area under it.Any failure of the curfew is the fault of the people who did not observe the curfew. Nothing short of an enforced 24/hr a day lock down can be expected to end all disease transmission. If the curfew hours are observed by everyone then during those hours the only spread that can occur is among people in the same house waiting out the curfew hours. As long as people are free to move about and interact with others there will be virus spread. That's just common sense. So shortening the number of hours people are confined to their homes can only allow more time for carriers to infect others. There is just no way around this simple concept. I'm not advocating more curfew it does damage to the economy and people's lives, but everyone must accept that outside the curfew they must actively take proactive efforts to ensure they do spread or catch the virus. Not everyone is willing to do this so the virus spreads easily and at times rather quickly. We'll see in a couple of weeks if the extra two hours of unrestricted movement has the expected effect of causing the infection number to rise by some degree.
What you failed to mention is extremely important for the Covid freaksAny failure of the curfew is the fault of the people who did not observe the curfew. Nothing short of an enforced 24/hr a day lock down can be expected to end all disease transmission. If the curfew hours are observed by everyone then during those hours the only spread that can occur is among people in the same house waiting out the curfew hours. As long as people are free to move about and interact with others there will be virus spread. That's just common sense. So shortening the number of hours people are confined to their homes can only allow more time for carriers to infect others. There is just no way around this simple concept. I'm not advocating more curfew it does damage to the economy and people's lives, but everyone must accept that outside the curfew they must actively take proactive efforts to ensure they do spread or catch the virus. Not everyone is willing to do this so the virus spreads easily and at times rather quickly. We'll see in a couple of weeks if the extra two hours of unrestricted movement has the expected effect of causing the infection number to rise by some degree.
Indeed I do.Do you know how many lives have been saved because people took this pandemic seriously or better yet do you care?
thick as s...t...typical !
Any failure of the curfew is the fault of the people who did not observe the curfew. Nothing short of an enforced 24/hr a day lock down can be expected to end all disease transmission. If the curfew hours are observed by everyone then during those hours the only spread that can occur is among people in the same house waiting out the curfew hours. As long as people are free to move about and interact with others there will be virus spread. That's just common sense. So shortening the number of hours people are confined to their homes can only allow more time for carriers to infect others. There is just no way around this simple concept. I'm not advocating more curfew it does damage to the economy and people's lives, but everyone must accept that outside the curfew they must actively take proactive efforts to ensure they do spread or catch the virus. Not everyone is willing to do this so the virus spreads easily and at times rather quickly. We'll see in a couple of weeks if the extra two hours of unrestricted movement has the expected effect of causing the infection number to rise by some degree.
Any failure of the curfew is the fault of the people who did not observe the curfew. Nothing short of an enforced 24/hr a day lock down can be expected to end all disease transmission. If the curfew hours are observed by everyone then during those hours the only spread that can occur is among people in the same house waiting out the curfew hours. As long as people are free to move about and interact with others there will be virus spread. That's just common sense. So shortening the number of hours people are confined to their homes can only allow more time for carriers to infect others. There is just no way around this simple concept. I'm not advocating more curfew it does damage to the economy and people's lives, but everyone must accept that outside the curfew they must actively take proactive efforts to ensure they do spread or catch the virus. Not everyone is willing to do this so the virus spreads easily and at times rather quickly. We'll see in a couple of weeks if the extra two hours of unrestricted movement has the expected effect of causing the infection number to rise by some degree.
I had been going with a 0.5% fatality rate (1 in 200) of those infected (not reported cases, but estimates of those infected) from early on in this pandemic. It seems it is much less than that.
Much less.
If countries closed from every disease, virus that causes a similar % of deaths nothing would EVER be open. This is about population control pure and simple.
Indeed. The 1.5 million deaths per year from TB is a good example; it's an EXTREMELY contagious disease that truly IS spread by aerosol and NO-ONE wears a mask. I am not sure of the stats for TB in DR, but it's a massive problem in Haiti and elsewhere. No lockdowns, no masks, no nothing. Even with the inflated numbers, Covid deaths will not approach TB deaths this year.
All of this defies logic, come on people, THINK!!!!!
Cough.. cough, cough, cough...When a cough, is not just a cough.
Another malady that the whore mongers of Sosua may want to keep in mind.
Asymptomatic does not mean you are a contagious person. It only means you developed Sars antibodies.How can you protect the vulnerable when the asymptomatics don't know they have it? This is the very reason why the curfew is important