For Chiri, Lambada, Rick and company....
No Chiri, I was not angry when I posted that or any other response here. I was a bit confused why someone would ask for input on whether or not what she witnessed in Santo Domingo happens elsewhere and then after one person takes up her offer she goes into a debate!
Other than that, I'm fine.
I do have to ask one question for all of you to answer:
WHY IS IT A LAW TO NOT LITTER / DRIVE WITH ALCOHOL IN ONE'S SYSTEM / TO MAKE A SIGNAL PRIOR TO TURNING, ETC?
I think that if most First World people were truly taught in their homes to not litter etc., there would be enough people practicing such that the governments of such countries would not see the need to impose and enforce a law pertaining to such action.
I also don't understand why towns with low enforcement of littering laws have more litter on their streets while towns with more enforcement of littering laws are spotless.
And to Rick, the answer to all your questions are a big YES! But, we are not debating what I think about this subject, we are simply debating whether First World people value have a tendency to not litter due to family values or government enforcement and how that relates to what's witnessed in the DR. The fact that there are laws prohibiting people from littering gives me the impression that enforcement outnumbers family values by a huge margin and the
lack of enforcement in the DR is the main culprit for why there is so much litter in many places.
Similarly, the reason why people drive erratically is precisely because of the scarce enforcement of driving rules, despite the efforts of AMET.
But, some people want to believe it has to do with being educated beyond the 8th grade (even though kids in Kindergarten learn to not litter if they are taught such principles
and such principles are enforced by parental/authority figures), thus the notion that people need an education beyond the 8th grade to learn how to not litter is ludicrus at best.
Others want to believe that its all about family values and what is taught to children in the home. Sure, some people obviously learn from the example of their parents and the enforcement of such values which their parents enforce upon their children is what keeps the children following the values taught in their home. But, it still remains true that there are laws all over the First World prohibiting an action that many people here claim is learned in the home. If most First Worldlers learn to not litter in the home, why does their governments feel the need to make such principle into law? Wouldn't the benefit of a litter free society prevent people from littering without having their government threaten them with fines or even arrest? Obviously not!
And the list goes on and on.
Also, the jeepeta bashing is really something on this board in general. People, sink this in your heads. Other folks are not going to change their behavior to suit your tastes, so get off the anti-jeepeta stand and live your life for goodness sakes!
I even get the impression some of you have a sort of grudge (perhaps envy of some sort? Could be) towards jeepeta owners!!!
And leave the new riches alone, in fact leave all rich people alone! If anything they are probably giving more to the development of the DR than most DR1ers! For certain, one does need to wonder if many DR1ers are simply envious of the Dominican upper class?
Hmm... could be!
-NALs