sunshine_79 said:Interesting. Where do those figures come from? Which country?
The figures come from wishful thinking.
Scandall
sunshine_79 said:Interesting. Where do those figures come from? Which country?
Scandall said:Hmmm. Yes. But let's put it in perspective. And this comes from a book I just finished...Freakonomics. Interesting read.
Imagine you are a parent and your child has two options on a Saturday afternoon. 1) Visit a friend's house where there is a swimming pool or 2) Visit a friend's house where you know there is a gun in the house.
Most parents would choose the pool. But statistically the child is 100 times more likely to be involved in a serious accident there than the house with the gun. But pool accidents are not very sexy on the evening news.
Obviously, there are other factors that come into play. But I would highly recommend the book if anyoine is interested in economics, statistics etc.
Disagree if you wish.
Scandall
MrMike said:What if they have a gun AND a pool?
I am told by the police, that it was in Yasica, on the Caretera Turistica.Conchman said:Where in Puerto Plata did this happen?
Rocky said:As you guys discuss the pros & cons of having a gun, let me say that I feel bad for the Austrian dude who lost his life, but I thank him for ridding this planet of that scurge, who not only was a career criminal, but also robbed some of our very own DR1 members at gunpoint.
Yasica is the first town you go through, as you head South on the tourist road, going to Santiago from Montellano.Conchman said:Where is Yasica?
Scandall said:I agree with Rellosk about having strict standards. Because of my background and training (9mm up through 155mm Howitzers) it drives me nuts when I see cops...COPS!...walking around like John Wayne with the pistols in their waistbands.....guns are not toys...
As for Larry...he and I have already had this discussion and it will go nowhere so I will not bore him and the rest of you by arguing....suffice it to say that I am glad the Second Amendment exists in the US...
Scandall
billyidol said:Its simple no guns equals no deaths from gun shots
Exactly, and nobody's going to change their minds.Scandall said:We can go round and round on this subject.
Scandall
heldengebroed said:Having a gun is one thing but being capable off killing a person is another matter. Only very few are capable off killing (Lucky for us). During the American civil war there were soldiers that stood face to face to the enemy who were shooting at them that loaded their gun 27 times aimed and didn't shoot towards thier enemy who was only a few metres away. If my memory is correct only 3 percent off trained soldiers kill in action.
Greetings Johan
Mirador said:Several years ago, (on November 27th, 1992 to be exact) I watched from my office building in Caracas, from dawn until mid afternoon, a battle unfold. The military airbase of La Carlota had been taken over by insurgents under the command of Gen. Gr?eber Odreman, loyal to jailed Col. Hugo Chavez who had tried a similar stunt less than a year previous. the airfield had been blocked by tanks and the ensuing battle to take over the main command building brought face to face infantrymen from both sides. Heavy machine gun fire ricocheted just above the group of us who tried to take quick glances at the action from inside our building. After about ten hours of ceaseless battle, which included strafing by aircrafts, ended with the surrender of the insurgents, who were made to lie face down by the hundreds in the middle of the airfield. To my astonishment, I detected not one casualty on either side.
Not a very stylish way of saying it, but that's more or less it.AZB said:I see it like this. 2 people shoot each other. One goes to hell and other goes to heaven. One scumbag less on the streets. case closed.
AZB