Well they say that Britain and America are two cultures divided by the same language, and reading some of the comments on here I completely agree. I think if the UK had a gay ambassador in Dominican Republic nobody would notice, nor comment, on his sexuality. London has a Muslim mayor and the UK has a female Prime Minister and I don't think anyone noticed until the US started pointing this out. We've moved with the times. Some of the people commenting on here should really try to do the same.
Fine to say Brewster was useless for his policies. But if you find the fact that he was a gay man and married to another man offensive, then you really ought to question your own beliefs, not his. If you had a disabled ambassador, would it be wrong for him to appear in a wheelchair? Or are you of the belief that any disabled ambassador would also be a disgrace? What about if he had been, dare I say it, black? Does anyone honestly believe that Donald Trump will somehow be respected more on the world stage than Obama just because he is white? Come on really?
Brewster didn't need to be ashamed because he was homosexual. He didn't need to hide his sexuality or pretend he was something else. By appearing at an event with the person that he was married to, he wasn't "shoving his sexuality down anyone's throat", unless you believe that a heterosexual man and his wife appearing together would be doing the same.
I am gay and have lived in DR for a number of years, and I chose the country because it is so gay friendly and welcoming. People accept you as you are. Most Dominicans are so worried about money that they don't seem to care much about anything else, and I've found them welcoming of difference. Even gay Dominicans don't have a hard time, at least not compared to how I imagine things would be in the US.
As I have commented before, if this were a forum in the UK and people posted some of the homophobic comments they have posted on here, it would be illegal and the police could get involved. Please people get something positive from the Brewster experience, question why you do find the idea of a married man attending an event with his partner so offensive, and try to move some of your beliefs into the 21st century.
Fine to say Brewster was useless for his policies. But if you find the fact that he was a gay man and married to another man offensive, then you really ought to question your own beliefs, not his. If you had a disabled ambassador, would it be wrong for him to appear in a wheelchair? Or are you of the belief that any disabled ambassador would also be a disgrace? What about if he had been, dare I say it, black? Does anyone honestly believe that Donald Trump will somehow be respected more on the world stage than Obama just because he is white? Come on really?
Brewster didn't need to be ashamed because he was homosexual. He didn't need to hide his sexuality or pretend he was something else. By appearing at an event with the person that he was married to, he wasn't "shoving his sexuality down anyone's throat", unless you believe that a heterosexual man and his wife appearing together would be doing the same.
I am gay and have lived in DR for a number of years, and I chose the country because it is so gay friendly and welcoming. People accept you as you are. Most Dominicans are so worried about money that they don't seem to care much about anything else, and I've found them welcoming of difference. Even gay Dominicans don't have a hard time, at least not compared to how I imagine things would be in the US.
As I have commented before, if this were a forum in the UK and people posted some of the homophobic comments they have posted on here, it would be illegal and the police could get involved. Please people get something positive from the Brewster experience, question why you do find the idea of a married man attending an event with his partner so offensive, and try to move some of your beliefs into the 21st century.