Per Recent Case Law In This Tierra Tribunales....

[jimmythegreek]

It is now admissible for a Concorcio-Directive-Administration to violate the rules of a Condominium...be it quorum or otherwise-so long as they can later put together a quorum to annul an unlawfully held prior meeting.

This is the corrupted and distorted type of case law that comes out of the courts in this country. Bad case law.

BTW-The Condominium law is completely inept in dealing with the corruption problems in these Condominiums in today's world...written in 1958 is a joke and needs major amending...Being that this Concorio-Directiva should be banned as an entity in the Condominium Law...Owners can only have the right as per their ownership to vote in legally held quorum meetings-no other special rights. The monopoly formations of owners in these Directivas with no auditory control over the financial account is left to only being legally challenged by individual property owners suffering under that corrupted regime.

 

[cobraboy]

The solution: rent, don't buy.

 

[SKY]

Could not agree more in this country. When you rent you can walk, when you buy you are stuck............

 

[JD Jones]

The solution: rent, don't buy.

Ssshhh... I'm learning a lot about buying condos here.

 

[jimmythegreek]

The solution: rent, don't buy.

Even renting here under these corrupted regimes has its pitfalls......Do you have shared gas, water or other services?

Best to live in a house here, if you can provide your own security. At least you have more control over your services directly.

Other solution is just don't live in this country and come for only visits to an all-inclusive. LOL.

 

[CristoRey]

Even renting here under these corrupted regimes has its pitfalls......

After reading several of your threads and posts related to living/owning/renting down here.
Its pretty obvious you ain't built for this place. Rather than constantly bad mouthing and bringing
all the negativity our way, perhaps you should consider relocating to another tropical destination.

That or just man up and handle your business.

 

[jimmythegreek]

After reading several of your threads and posts related to living/owning/renting down here.
Its pretty obvious you ain't built for this place. Rather than constantly bad mouthing and bringing
all the negativity our way, perhaps you should consider relocating to another tropical destination.

That or just man up and handle your business.

This is the legal section. My post is 100% about legal-What is your problem?

 

[CristoRey]

This is the legal section. My post is 100% about legal-What is your problem?

Zero problems. I'm living very comfortable down here, thanks for asking :cheeky:

 

[Fabio J. Guzman]

Could you please be more specific about the ruling? You are saying that the condo association can annul an unlawful meeting held before without the proper quorum. Isn't that the proper action that should be taken?

 

[jimmythegreek]

Could you please be more specific about the ruling? You are saying that the condo association can annul an unlawful meeting held before without the proper quorum. Isn't that the proper action that should be taken?

Yes, now the Concorcio can use future quorum meetings to annul meeting prior that were held unlawfully per the ruling.

The proper action was to not violate the quorum rule in the first place. Secondly, if not for property owners challenging the issue in the courts, no one would even know about these issues in the case law.

The annulment process in Condominiums is relegated to meetings that were held lawfully prior-not unlawful meetings.

In effect, to allow unlawful meetings to be annulled after the fact allows the Concorcio a green light to effectively violate rules as they choose hoping that property owners will not challenge them legally and that they can utilize this ruling to cover up their improprieties-None of which is good for property ownership in this country.