Somos Pueblo: Where are the clothes of the person of interest in the missing Indian woman case?

[Dolores]

The US FBI, Dominican prosecutors, Interpol, a detective from the Sheriff’s Office of a community in Virginia state, and Dominican police are investigating the whereabouts of 20-year old Sudiksha Konanki, gone missing on the early morning of Friday, 6 March 2025 at the Riu Republica in Punta Cana. She was here with five friends on spring break vacation. She was last seen in a surveillance camera dressed in beach attire and headed with friends to the beach. While her girlfriends were still in night club attire from the partying they had been at that evening, Konanki is seen walking embraced with a friend made at the resort, identified as a person of interest in the case. The surveillance video shows the two seemingly tipsy from partying at the all-you-can-drink resort that evening.

What has to be answered is what happened at the beach that led the young woman to go...

Continue reading...

 

[Big]

another interesting update.

 

[bob saunders]

Martínez Brito se pronuncia

Martínez Brito se pronuncia

noticiaspais.com

 

[windeguy]

Joshua walked back to the Hotel without his clothes which are still missing?

 

[jd426]

Someone else on here at DR 1 Said that in the video he is Carrying his T Shirt . which I did not see ,.
Also his Socks and shoes are missing as well as his Phone ? which he claims he did not have with him the entire time on the beach. and thats how he could not tell time . or I guess his Excuse for not trying to Whats App her or contact her. ?
Which is Odd . what young person does not go everywhere with their PHONE ?

His Flip Flops missing is even more suspicious tho ,. (they get easily TORN when there is a Scuffle) .
Missing Flip Flops can be explained away I guess he thinks
Torn flip flops can Not .. so if they find them, it would be a big Clue

But it is just another Suspicious thing on top of the time line and everything else
Once you stack about 3 or 4 Odd coincidences, a Picture starts for form .

But now we read that he Lawyered Up and did not even answer any questions ??

 

[Joseph NY2STI]

"Eduardo Sanchez Tolentino (El Piro) and Ricardo Ripoll complained on Somos Pueblo that missing Dominicans have yet to get the same widespread efforts of the authorities to locate a person and solve the case."

Long overdue statement.

 

[jose949]

Source: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-14497721/Joshua-Riibe-Sudiksha-Konanki-Punta-Cana.html
No shirt visible

 

[jd426]

Im curious does it say anywhere that HE Claimed he did NOT know her Clothes and her Phone were on the beach, on a Chair ?
How would he not see that .
And if her Phone and clothes were there and he knew it .. WHY would he assume she went back to her Room ? without them
THIS is what the Parents meant when they said "she would never Leave her Phone"
to which some Genius Commented " who takes their Phone into the Ocean"
Its really hard to have a discussion when someone posts something so ridiculous ..

 

[keepcoming]

I would lawyer up too, especially given the fact he is in another country and at the moment cannot leave. Getting a lawyer does not mean guilty of something.

 

[jd426]

I would lawyer up too, especially given the fact he is in another country and at the moment cannot leave. Getting a lawyer does not mean guilty of something.

Yes, but Im curious if the First reports of him answering questions, and then changing his Story were also completely FALSE .
WHEN did he lawyer up , is the big question ?

 

[El Hijo de Manolo]

Im curious does it say anywhere that HE Claimed he did NOT know her Clothes and her Phone were on the beach, on a Chair ?
How would he not see that .
And if her Phone and clothes were there and he knew it .. WHY would he assume she went back to her Room ? without them
THIS is what the Parents meant when they said "she would never Leave her Phone"
to which some Genius Commented " who takes their Phone into the Ocean"
Its really hard to have a discussion when someone posts something so ridiculous ..

Reports indicate her clothes were properly folded on a chaise lounge.

 

[Big]

Someone else on here at DR 1 Said that in the video he is Carrying his T Shirt . which I did not see ,.
Also his Socks and shoes are missing as well as his Phone ? which he claims he did not have with him the entire time on the beach. and thats how he could not tell time . or I guess his Excuse for not trying to Whats App her or contact her. ?
Which is Odd . what young person does not go everywhere with their PHONE ?

His Flip Flops missing is even more suspicious tho ,. (they get easily TORN when there is a Scuffle) .
Missing Flip Flops can be explained away I guess he thinks
Torn flip flops can Not .. so if they find them, it would be a big Clue

But it is just another Suspicious thing on top of the time line and everything else
Once you stack about 3 or 4 Odd coincidences, a Picture starts for form .

But now we read that he Lawyered Up and did not even answer any questions ??

JD, he was wearing shoes and socks, which makes it more bizarre. He returned without them.

 

[El Hijo de Manolo]

Yes, but Im curious if the First reports of him answering questions, and then changing his Story were also completely FALSE .
WHEN did he lawyer up , is the big question ?

When someone like Epstein lawyer and Harvard Emeritus Professor Alan Dershowitz read about his ridiculous 3 accounts of the events!

 

[El Hijo de Manolo]

JD, he was wearing shoes and socks, which makes it more bizarre. He returned without them.

Wasn't he shirtless returning also? By the time DiCRIM got to the beach, whatever crime scene that had been left had been long since contaminated.

 

[JD Jones]

Source: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-14497721/Joshua-Riibe-Sudiksha-Konanki-Punta-Cana.html
No shirt visible

tucked in his waistband.

 

[JLSawmam]

Im curious does it say anywhere that HE Claimed he did NOT know her Clothes and her Phone were on the beach, on a Chair ?
How would he not see that .
And if her Phone and clothes were there and he knew it .. WHY would he assume she went back to her Room ? without them
THIS is what the Parents meant when they said "she would never Leave her Phone"
to which some Genius Commented " who takes their Phone into the Ocean"
Its really hard to have a discussion when someone posts something so ridiculous ..

From this thread: https://dr1.com/forums/threads/girl-missing-from-riu-hotel-in-punta-cana.414134/page-13 post #256 Sudiksha’s father also questioned the fact that his daughter’s belongings, including her phone and wallet, were left with her friends. “It is unusual because she always carried her phone with her . ” So, she gave her friends those items. And it is not clear exactly what clothes were left neatly folded...maybe just whatever she wore over her bikini...not impossible that he just didn't see it in the morning, depending on where it was in relation to where he woke up

 

[jose949]

tucked in his waistband.

View attachment 10582

Thanks, barely visible though if one plays the actual video from around 2:45 you don't see it flailing around. Also if you watch both sides of his shorts they bulge out the same way (left and right) as he steps in the few seconds it plays.

If you slow it down, its ambiguous, can't rule it in, can't rule it out. The station did a disservice by placing their water mark over a key part of the video but I am sure the resort and investigators have the original video. He's got an inconsistency if he had his shirt but said he didn't pick his things.

The station that got a copy of his interview transcript noted that:

"I took off my shoes and socks, emptied my pockets, and took off my shirt. I put them on a chair and got into the sea."

At the end of the interview, he curiously said that the next day they found his things because he never picked them up, but someone had stolen his shoes and the key card to his room.

 

[jose949]

From this thread: https://dr1.com/forums/threads/girl-missing-from-riu-hotel-in-punta-cana.414134/page-13 post #256 Sudiksha’s father also questioned the fact that his daughter’s belongings, including her phone and wallet, were left with her friends. “It is unusual because she always carried her phone with her . ” So, she gave her friends those items. And it is not clear exactly what clothes were left neatly folded...maybe just whatever she wore over her bikini...not impossible that he just didn't see it in the morning, depending on where it was in relation to where he woke up

I think if she was inebriated and planning to go in the water that might seem like something she reasonably might do. 1) To not loose her phone while under the influence 2) Not to get it damaged in the water.

In his interview, he said 2 girls did not go in the water.

It's mentioned: "Konanki’s sarong-style cover-up was found on a lounge chair on the beach. There were no signs of violence, a Dominican Republic law enforcement source familiar with the investigation told CNN" https://www.cnn.com/2025/03/11/us/sudiksha-konanki-missing-what-we-know-hnk/index.html

 

[El Hijo de Manolo]

Thanks, barely visible though if one plays the actual video from around 2:45 you don't see it flailing around. Also if you watch both sides of his shorts they bulge out the same way (left and right) as he steps in the few seconds it plays.

If you slow it down, its ambiguous, can't rule it in, can't rule it out. The station did a disservice by placing their water mark over a key part of the video but I am sure the resort and investigators have the original video. He's got an inconsistency if he had his shirt but said he didn't pick his things.

The station that got a copy of his interview transcript noted that:

"I took off my shoes and socks, emptied my pockets, and took off my shirt. I put them on a chair and got into the sea."

At the end of the interview, he curiously said that the next day they found his things because he never picked them up, but someone had stolen his shoes and the key card to his room.

As was mentioned in the other thread, the DR and the corrupt PN would only gain cred if they put the screws to this guy. No sane person can believe all his stories and now lawyered up not answering simple questions.

 

[jose949]

As was mentioned in the other thread, the DR and the corrupt PN would only gain cred if they put the screws to this guy. No sane person can believe all his stories and now lawyered up not answering simple questions.

I agree, they are probably going to have to consider him as a suspect to get anything more. By over investing in the drowning theory, they probably overlooked potential evidence and investigatory angles. Maybe they will get their act together, they have a very small window of time to get this right and back on track.