Ok, if you want to talk big picture…In my opinion, the fundamental nature of females are no different in the Dominican Republic than anywhere in the world. When I quoted Tupac I was referencing my extensive travel to countries around the world (yeah I know those who wrestle with pigs had different thoughts). Our base need as human beings have not changed. I am making reference to Maslow's hierarchy of needs: physiological, safety, belonging and love, social needs or esteem, and self-actualization. If you wish to challenge my assertion then make your argument.
Now this take on human nature is highly debated and attempts to prove them through empirical examination of social trends show us that in prosperous nations the progression of these needs get short circuited.
For example: It is striking for Maslow's theory that First World countries, where so many people's basic needs are met, experience considerably higher divorce rates. Within the United States, it is those with more money and a more stable economic situation who have higher suicide rates than those from the lower socio-economic strata. Furthermore, it is estimated that the suicide rate is twice as high in Caucasian than minority communities in the U.S. (Apologies in advance to everyone about to have apoplectic fit because they THINK I’m playing the race card. I am not. I describing a population characteristic).
I’m with Mr. Cobraboy on this one:
The further away from "traditional" roles men and women play in a society, the more miserable and lonely men and women become.
My argument remains that throughout the entire world, these new changes will not necessarily bring happiness to the individuals making the changes. In a society (Dominican Republic specifically) where the government does not provided adequate resources to provide care for it citizens as they age, the cohesive nature of the family unit remains the main care system in place for the elderly. Will the “new Dominicana” escape the need to take care of her parents? Who will take care of her in old age if she does not have a family? These are the sort of question that come to my mind when reading about these changes. And anyone here that would like to is free to address these issues as they pertain from any country perspective they would like.
This is my age group and that of nearly all Dominican women that I know. They (relatively educated Dominicanas in this age category) aren't interested in the typical, traditional role of previous generations in the least.
Not hating on this. Everyone has to live their life for their own benefit.
My mother-in-law takes pride in catering to her family, hand and foot. Her job is the cooking, cleaning, child-rearing, washing, and shopping. Her husband helps now and then, mostly with daily dishes and weekly laundry. But he is retired and very much retires to Dominoes, walks to the malecon, visiting, and riding his bike.
Not hating on this too. Female in this case made a choice to be with male. It is role she chose. No one forced it on her. He worked hard to get to the point of retirement. He should enjoy his life.
Their daughter has a university degree and just turned 30. She has a mediocre job, and does okay. She's not wealthy but she wouldn't quit her job to stay home when she could work to buy herself nice things. Would she fall into her mother's role for anybody? Not in a million years.
And why would she stay at home and follow in the footsteps of her Mother? Show me a dominicana that takes care of her children herself and I’ll point to the same person and show you a poor girl. Apartments in the range of 1.8 - 2.2 million DOP have “habitaciones de servico”. That shows developers realize market demands these amenities. I rarely see a Mother or entire family out in Santo Domingo without the domestic help doing the heavy lifting. So I would suspect that should “their daughter” decide to form a domestic partnership she would do so with the ability to hire someone to care for the home and a child/children (if any resulted from the blissful domestic union).
OFF TOPIC: I’m not inclined to do gorilla type reach arounds and then flinging at others because I don’t like their perspective. But it doesn’t surprise me. That is the nature of online communities and from what I’ve read in this thread and others DR1 is no different in that respect. Someone does not have a high post count…that means they don’t know (expletive redacted) about anything they post if they happen to disagree with the person with high post count. Furthermore it is my opinion if people are not prepared to have someone disagree with them then maybe they should keep their opinions to themselves and not be posting them in a public forum.
]and as for your dinosaurs.....
don't look over your shoulder….
Hey Mr. illster, I prefer to be referred to as Mr. YMNV if you choose to truncate my name. What do you prefer? Remember they be
your dinosaurs brother and I don’t need to look over my shoulder. You see the dinosaurs died out. But they are getting close to being recreated. But that’s at least 5 years out. So you may be getting ahead of yourself.
Now if you are referring to
ad hominem. Those pesky creatures are tough. And are still hanging in there. I only need to look at your responses to my posts in this thread to find them.
Ad hominem...short for
argumentum ad hominem, is a fallacious argumentative strategy whereby genuine discussion of the topic at hand is avoided by instead attacking the character, motive, or other attribute of the person making the argument, or persons associated with the argument, rather than attacking the substance of the argument itself.