Mandatory drivers license, insurance and vehicle inspections. What are wrong with ANY of these?
A drivers license provides some minimal proof that you have some clue as to how to operate a motor vehicle in a safe manner. A vehicle can (and does) kill more people here than anything else so why not license at least as well as they do firearms?
Insurance assures everyone on the road that someone has underwritten your skills (guarantees them) sufficient to cover financial damages should you incur them. (put your hands down, I have this) But in the DR there also needs to be some corollary changes to prevent silly lawsuits resulting from practically nothing.
Vehicle inspections should be mandatory so we are all assured the vehicle itself is largely safe. I don't mean inspections as they have in the U.S. as that would be too much. But at least can we have headlights, tail lights and the odd turn signal? Mufflers, decent suspension and uncracked windshields would be a bit much at this point.
The government could generate more income through fees and taxes, inspectors and officials could generate more income through bribes and kickbacks and we all might be...just might be...a tad bit safer.
insurance in the DR is not based on underwriting principles. it is based solely on the age of the car, and the number of cylinders. driver capabilities and tendencies has nothing to do with insurance here. there is no databank that can provide critical information, such as how many speeding tickets an applicant has, how many times his license has been suspended, etc, which forms the basis for underwriting.