[*]El ni?o disfrutar? de todos los derechos enunciados en esta declaraci?n.Estos derechos ser?n reconocidos a todos los ni?os sin excepci?n alguna ni distinci?n o discriminaci?n por motivos de raza, color, sexo, idioma, religi?n, opiniones pol?ticas o de otra ?ndole, origen nacional o social, posici?n econ?mica, nacimiento u otra condici?n, ya sea del propio ni?o o de su familia.
This is the bottom line here, above the law, which should be adapted so that this criteria is met for all children born in the country. It doesn't matter who else complies or not. As stated, the DR signed this treaty.
Makes me sick when I hear people say they think denying children an identity and education is a "price" that the children have to "pay". Likewise, parents cannot PAY for anything through their children, as they are subjects and not objects. Children do not have to suffer for anything their parents do or have as a condition, they innately have all of the rights enumerated in the CRC.
With that same logic, are the kids shining shoes in the street are "paying" because their parents can't afford to provide for them? Are the girls that marry old men "paying" because their parents didn't look out for their best interests? Are babies born with HIV "paying" because their mom didn't have access to or knowledge about preventing vertical transmission?