Some are drawing way too many conclusions here.
If the embassy requested a DNA, wouldn't it be to prove he was the biological father? Otherwise, it would have been an adoption, in which case no DNA required.
As per the man turning his back on his family after finding or assuming his wife cheated on him, it is a no brainier.
There are millions of Dominicans who would still walk away from a woman who cheats; specially if she was a virgin at marriage.
Archaic? maybe; but it is still part of the Dominican culture.
Let's give some time to the story. It may be a scam or it may not be. They know they'll be asked to take more DNA tests before the dust settles.
As per the wrong DNA test, the lab is at fault. They provided the expert opinion and the Consulate made a decision based on it.
For instance, if you rear end into a car. If as a result, that car rear ends into another car. The first car is responsible for all the damages. Isn't it?
If the embassy requested a DNA, wouldn't it be to prove he was the biological father? Otherwise, it would have been an adoption, in which case no DNA required.
As per the man turning his back on his family after finding or assuming his wife cheated on him, it is a no brainier.
There are millions of Dominicans who would still walk away from a woman who cheats; specially if she was a virgin at marriage.
Archaic? maybe; but it is still part of the Dominican culture.
Let's give some time to the story. It may be a scam or it may not be. They know they'll be asked to take more DNA tests before the dust settles.
As per the wrong DNA test, the lab is at fault. They provided the expert opinion and the Consulate made a decision based on it.
For instance, if you rear end into a car. If as a result, that car rear ends into another car. The first car is responsible for all the damages. Isn't it?