{"id":227402,"date":"2024-11-26T08:23:11","date_gmt":"2024-11-26T12:23:11","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/dr1.com\/news\/?p=227402"},"modified":"2024-11-26T08:57:19","modified_gmt":"2024-11-26T12:57:19","slug":"dominican-society-of-dailies-rejects-new-judicial-data-protection-policy","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/dr1.com\/news\/2024\/11\/26\/dominican-society-of-dailies-rejects-new-judicial-data-protection-policy\/","title":{"rendered":"Dominican Society of Dailies rejects new judicial data protection policy would suppress names online"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<div class=\"wp-block-image\"><figure class=\"aligncenter size-large is-resized\"><img src=\"https:\/\/dr1.com\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/Sociedad-Dominicana-Diarios-Politica-Proteccion-Datos-Listin-Diario-1024x367.png\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-227427\" width=\"600\" srcset=\"https:\/\/dr1.com\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/Sociedad-Dominicana-Diarios-Politica-Proteccion-Datos-Listin-Diario-1024x367.png 1024w, https:\/\/dr1.com\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/Sociedad-Dominicana-Diarios-Politica-Proteccion-Datos-Listin-Diario-300x108.png 300w, https:\/\/dr1.com\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/Sociedad-Dominicana-Diarios-Politica-Proteccion-Datos-Listin-Diario-768x275.png 768w, https:\/\/dr1.com\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/Sociedad-Dominicana-Diarios-Politica-Proteccion-Datos-Listin-Diario-1536x551.png 1536w, https:\/\/dr1.com\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/Sociedad-Dominicana-Diarios-Politica-Proteccion-Datos-Listin-Diario.png 1584w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 706px) 89vw, (max-width: 767px) 82vw, 740px\" \/><\/figure><\/div>\n\n\n\n<p>The Dominican Society of Daily Newspapers (SDD) has voiced strong opposition to the Supreme Court of Justice\u2019s newly introduced \u201cJudicial Data Protection Policy,\u201d arguing that it undermines constitutional guarantees and hinders public access to judicial proceedings.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The SDD contends that the policy grants the judiciary excessive discretion to withhold crucial information, thereby fostering opacity and impeding the exercise of public freedoms. The association further asserts that the Supreme Court\u2019s interpretation of relevant laws is fundamentally flawed, as it misapplies legal provisions that do not pertain to judicial processes.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>&#8220;Article 69, paragraph 4 of the Constitution guarantees every person the right to a public, oral, and adversarial trial, with equal conditions and full respect for the right of defense,&#8221; the SDD stated in a document. &#8220;Moreover, the Constitution limits the powers of the Judiciary, including the Supreme Court of Justice, to the administration of justice, without granting it legislative powers.&#8221;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The association takes particular issue with the Supreme Court&#8217;s assertion that Law 172-13, on the protection of personal data, applies to the handling of data by courts and tribunals. The SDD argues that this law explicitly excludes journalistic sources and is intended to protect personal data while also facilitating access to information in accordance with the Constitution.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>&#8220;The application of this policy to judicial proceedings is improper,&#8221; the SDD declared. &#8220;Furthermore, it contravenes Article 42, paragraph II of Law 2-23 on the Appeal of Cassation, which mandates the full publication of Supreme Court decisions in the Judicial Bulletin, both in print and digitally on the Supreme Court&#8217;s website.&#8221;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The SDD\u2019s concerns center around the potential for the new policy to create a more secretive judiciary, limiting public scrutiny and hindering the ability of journalists to report on matters of public interest. The association is calling on the Supreme Court to reconsider the policy and to ensure that it aligns with the constitutional principles of transparency and accountability.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The Supreme Court of Justice decision would insert initials where names would have appeared in its rulings published online.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Read more:<br><a href=\"https:\/\/listindiario.com\/la-republica\/justicia\/20241126\/sociedad-dominicana-diarios-rechaza-politica-proteccion-datos-judicial_835215.html\">Listin Diario <\/a><br><a href=\"https:\/\/www.elcaribe.com.do\/panorama\/justicia\/la-sociedad-de-diarios-rechaza-politica-de-proteccion-de-datos-scj\/\">El Caribe <\/a><br><a href=\"https:\/\/hoy.com.do\/sociedad-dominicana-de-diarios-rechaza-politica-de-proteccion-de-datos\/\">Hoy <\/a><br><a href=\"https:\/\/eldia.com.do\/sociedad-de-diarios-opuesta-a-politica-proteccion-de-datos\/\">El Dia <\/a><br><a href=\"https:\/\/www.diariolibre.com\/actualidad\/nacional\/2024\/11\/26\/sdd-rechaza-la-politica-de-proteccion-de-datos-del-poder-judicial\/2923128\">Diario Libre <\/a><br><a href=\"https:\/\/dr1.com\/forums\/threads\/freedom-to-be-informed-and-transparency-vs-privacy-supreme-court-favors-anonymous-court-rulings.412935\/\">DR1 News <\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>26 November 2024<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The Dominican Society of Daily Newspapers (SDD) has voiced strong opposition to the Supreme Court of Justice\u2019s newly introduced \u201cJudicial Data Protection Policy,\u201d arguing that it undermines constitutional guarantees and hinders public access to judicial proceedings. The SDD contends that the policy grants the judiciary excessive discretion to withhold crucial information, thereby fostering opacity and &hellip; <\/p>\n<p class=\"link-more\"><a href=\"https:\/\/dr1.com\/news\/2024\/11\/26\/dominican-society-of-dailies-rejects-new-judicial-data-protection-policy\/\" class=\"more-link\">Read more\u2026<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[330,3],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/dr1.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/227402"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/dr1.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/dr1.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dr1.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dr1.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=227402"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/dr1.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/227402\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":227429,"href":"https:\/\/dr1.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/227402\/revisions\/227429"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/dr1.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=227402"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dr1.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=227402"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dr1.com\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=227402"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}