LoL @ Suarezn.
But in all seriousness, we should really consider if trafficking is as bad as people say, at least economically. Of course there are many social costs involved of which examples are in abundance, incarceration, sickness etc. My question is are these outwheighed by the economic benefits? Particularly for poor nations such as DR?
Im not crazy for bringing this point up. Im just saying the record is not straight on wether allowing drug smuggling to continue at a certain level is overall good for the country. Lets look at 3 examples in Latin America: Peru, Colombia and Panama.
Guess what, in 2009 these were some of the largest receivers of foreign direct investment aside of the majors (Brazil/Mexico). Peru was the only major world economy to exceed 2008 FDI in 2009, and it is an investment grade nation. Lets remember that Peru beat out Colombia in cocaine production a couple of years back.
Colombia is well poised to outperform its 2009 economic growth this year. After Uribe cornered the drug trafficking guerrillas investment in energy (coal/oil) has boomed and their FX rate is strengthening behind solid FDI.
Panama is a haven for all kinds of ill gotten wealth and guess who is the next one on the hit parade to obtain investment grade status in latin america. Panama.
So i ask you, is all this THAT bad???
You tell me???