archives..

L

laurapasinifan

Silver
Sep 19, 2005
4,632
91
48
I am wondering how much use the archives gets or if it is updated at all.. the last year looks like 2001!!, I wonder how much searching goes on in the 1999 archive......probably just the Prince fans only ha ha ha

I think a one or maybe two year old archive would be more usefull...

just bad bad bob trying to stay away from the election thread ha ha ha

bad bob
 
SantiagoDR

SantiagoDR

The "REAL" SantiagoDR
Jan 12, 2006
5,814
950
113
laurapasinifan said:
I am wondering how much use the archives gets or if it is updated at all.. the last year looks like 2001!!, I wonder how much searching goes on in the 1999 archive......probably just the Prince fans only ha ha ha

I think a one or maybe two year old archive would be more usefull...

just bad bad bob trying to stay away from the election thread ha ha ha

bad bob
Click to expand...

Web sites are rated on the quantity of posts on their sites, reducing the number of posts is not a good idea, at least that is what I understand.

The higher the rating, the more it costs to advertise.
 
Robert

Robert

Stay Frosty!
Jan 2, 1999
20,574
341
83
dr1.com
They are a legacy of our old message board. With the current board software, we do not need a dedicated archive.

Sites are rated on the quality and quantity of their traffic, not the number of their posts.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom