Please keep the topic to the train, no politics or personal innuendos...
This thread was started here:
http://www.dr1.com/forums/general-stuff/76923-train-route-santo-dgo-santiago.html
But due to off topic posting got closed!!!
Keep it on the ball~~~
All this from a SD - Santiago train!!!! LOL!!
Back to topic, sans the political crescendo and hypothetical corruption out of control in contrast to the entire world...
A good question and debate would be: Should the gov pay more attention to the two main cities and coastal's tourism enclaves first, or as planned, link the cities via the airports regardless of size or affordability in regards to distance and logical geography patterns?
If we aim for the markets that will afford the best flow to sustain the initial investment, aren't we in a way discriminating against the minorities in the process?
As planned, the initial link would be SDQ - STI, later SDQ - LMR, STI - POP, LMR - PUJ and so on...
Given the fact that neither LMR or PUJ are aimed/planned to see a local Metro using gov blueprints, will it be best to focus on the provinces still underserved but growing in the interior of the country not seeded with tourism infrastructures?
After SD Metro is populated with the first 6 or 7 lines, Santiago will be the next on line. From there on, the initial assessment is to have the system grow from Santiago to the other cities.
The el Sol street in Santiago will be changed into a restaurant/shopping district. But will retain all the charm of the architecture that blazes the streets today. As such the Metro will serve only the named street and one other in the Casco Urbano Historico of the city. The remainder and bulk of the Santiago Metro will focus on the growth the city is experiencing as of today.
The Metro for other cities will in fact be based on planning of further development and a set limit to the extension of city limits (something foreign to local authorities today).
Cities will be prodded to vertical growth when horizontal expansion is severely curtailed to protect our green areas. Horizontal expansion represents a challenge and vast waste of public resources in contrast; vertical growth reduces the work to upgrades and improvements of the systems in use to the benefit of all within the city limits.
The Metro system is not just that, but a bigger project that affects other components within the areas it services. Roads, traffic, congestion, population concentration, commercial/residential areas, etc... All these will be affected by such works.
The SD - Santiago high speed train will be no less impacting as it develops in the areas it services. Commerce will be addressed in new ways and entire routes will essentially be declared for commercial use only, separating private/public transportation from the commercial one.
The creation of specific lanes for traffic is one of the issues that the high speed trains will address commonly with other factors.
Mass transit is not only good and economically sound for private/public transportation but also for the commercial industry, where it holds a bigger impact.
When you cut the time that goods travel from the source to the end retailer, the effect is felt immediately as the retailers would be able to cut deep into huge inventories that sit idle. The flow of commerce will be more attune with the reality of supply and demand, not vice versa...
The SD Metro infrastructure is capable of handling both, public mass transportation during day hours and commercial traffic during the nights with the ability to field the commercial rolling stock to meet the needs of industry.
The same goes for the high speed system in the planning stages...
Trucking will be relegated to a feeding/branching support only, not as the primary artery of commercial traffic.
I know the implications of such planning seem big and very hard to accomplish (believe you me, they are) but the pay out is too grand to pass on it.
Once the goods are moved at late night hours, the resulting schedule will aid the local unemployment rate to drop, since major employers will need to create a new shift to re-stock their shelves as such.
This thread was started here:
http://www.dr1.com/forums/general-stuff/76923-train-route-santo-dgo-santiago.html
But due to off topic posting got closed!!!
Keep it on the ball~~~
All this from a SD - Santiago train!!!! LOL!!
Back to topic, sans the political crescendo and hypothetical corruption out of control in contrast to the entire world...
A good question and debate would be: Should the gov pay more attention to the two main cities and coastal's tourism enclaves first, or as planned, link the cities via the airports regardless of size or affordability in regards to distance and logical geography patterns?
If we aim for the markets that will afford the best flow to sustain the initial investment, aren't we in a way discriminating against the minorities in the process?
As planned, the initial link would be SDQ - STI, later SDQ - LMR, STI - POP, LMR - PUJ and so on...
Given the fact that neither LMR or PUJ are aimed/planned to see a local Metro using gov blueprints, will it be best to focus on the provinces still underserved but growing in the interior of the country not seeded with tourism infrastructures?
After SD Metro is populated with the first 6 or 7 lines, Santiago will be the next on line. From there on, the initial assessment is to have the system grow from Santiago to the other cities.
The el Sol street in Santiago will be changed into a restaurant/shopping district. But will retain all the charm of the architecture that blazes the streets today. As such the Metro will serve only the named street and one other in the Casco Urbano Historico of the city. The remainder and bulk of the Santiago Metro will focus on the growth the city is experiencing as of today.
The Metro for other cities will in fact be based on planning of further development and a set limit to the extension of city limits (something foreign to local authorities today).
Cities will be prodded to vertical growth when horizontal expansion is severely curtailed to protect our green areas. Horizontal expansion represents a challenge and vast waste of public resources in contrast; vertical growth reduces the work to upgrades and improvements of the systems in use to the benefit of all within the city limits.
The Metro system is not just that, but a bigger project that affects other components within the areas it services. Roads, traffic, congestion, population concentration, commercial/residential areas, etc... All these will be affected by such works.
The SD - Santiago high speed train will be no less impacting as it develops in the areas it services. Commerce will be addressed in new ways and entire routes will essentially be declared for commercial use only, separating private/public transportation from the commercial one.
The creation of specific lanes for traffic is one of the issues that the high speed trains will address commonly with other factors.
Mass transit is not only good and economically sound for private/public transportation but also for the commercial industry, where it holds a bigger impact.
When you cut the time that goods travel from the source to the end retailer, the effect is felt immediately as the retailers would be able to cut deep into huge inventories that sit idle. The flow of commerce will be more attune with the reality of supply and demand, not vice versa...
The SD Metro infrastructure is capable of handling both, public mass transportation during day hours and commercial traffic during the nights with the ability to field the commercial rolling stock to meet the needs of industry.
The same goes for the high speed system in the planning stages...
Trucking will be relegated to a feeding/branching support only, not as the primary artery of commercial traffic.
I know the implications of such planning seem big and very hard to accomplish (believe you me, they are) but the pay out is too grand to pass on it.
Once the goods are moved at late night hours, the resulting schedule will aid the local unemployment rate to drop, since major employers will need to create a new shift to re-stock their shelves as such.