Whether in someone's blog describing a vacation or service trip to the DR or in travel guides such as Lonely Planet, I have come across the following terms to describe some people and locations in the DR: villages, villagers and peasants. I have been here a while in a rural area, and am from one originally, and I am confused about the usage of such words.
For example, Lonely Planet calls Cabral, located near Barahona in the southwest, a village. Why? When I hear village, I think of remote, primative in Africa or something. To make sure I wasn't confused, I looked up village on dictionary.com and found: "a small community or group of houses in a rural area, larger than a hamlet and usually smaller than a town, and sometimes (as in parts of the U.S.) incorporated as a municipality." Ok. I also looked up town, and feel that Cabral and many other sites deemed "villages" are more like towns. Cabral has around 13,000 residents, paved roads, gas station, is a Municipality, has light and running water (mostly), has an oficialia, several schools, decent-sized park, jail and rural hospital. That's just one example, I'm sure there are some from elsewhere.
Debate: Should such places be called villages, and the Dominicans there villagers or peasants?
Consider:-Does the tourism industry have a special interest in using "villages" to make the places and people seem more quaint/primative, therefore appealing to tourists for 'excursions'?
-Do non-profits and churches have an interest to make people feel more sympathy for the people there and perceive that there is more extreme poverty?
-Is it non-pc to use the terms, like using third-world to describe countries?
-Does campo translate to village?
-Did people in developed countries develop the term in a biased way to describe anywhere that there isn't a McDonald's? :cheeky:
-If you are a Dominican from or in a place that gets called "village" and you a "villager", how do you feel about that?
For example, Lonely Planet calls Cabral, located near Barahona in the southwest, a village. Why? When I hear village, I think of remote, primative in Africa or something. To make sure I wasn't confused, I looked up village on dictionary.com and found: "a small community or group of houses in a rural area, larger than a hamlet and usually smaller than a town, and sometimes (as in parts of the U.S.) incorporated as a municipality." Ok. I also looked up town, and feel that Cabral and many other sites deemed "villages" are more like towns. Cabral has around 13,000 residents, paved roads, gas station, is a Municipality, has light and running water (mostly), has an oficialia, several schools, decent-sized park, jail and rural hospital. That's just one example, I'm sure there are some from elsewhere.
Debate: Should such places be called villages, and the Dominicans there villagers or peasants?
Consider:-Does the tourism industry have a special interest in using "villages" to make the places and people seem more quaint/primative, therefore appealing to tourists for 'excursions'?
-Do non-profits and churches have an interest to make people feel more sympathy for the people there and perceive that there is more extreme poverty?
-Is it non-pc to use the terms, like using third-world to describe countries?
-Does campo translate to village?
-Did people in developed countries develop the term in a biased way to describe anywhere that there isn't a McDonald's? :cheeky:
-If you are a Dominican from or in a place that gets called "village" and you a "villager", how do you feel about that?