And to see who ended up with his land and money after his execution.
Indagar?n destino de la fortuna de Trujillo - listindiario.com
Indagar?n destino de la fortuna de Trujillo - listindiario.com
Don't know much about the merits of their claim on assets, however, I do believe they have a point....history has been distorted, and they only talked about gloomy things and not the work of government and development that his grandfather bequeathed to Dominicans.
For fifty years we have sought to relegate the story about the Trujillo government, quite simply a black legend, a darkness that was not just meant for him. Once we have achieved this recognition, "people need to know of great deeds, and that it was the most fruitful period for the Dominican Republic throughout its republican history."
Who cares who stole Trujillo's assets? Trujillo stole them in the first place...
Sorry, not so simple.
If Trujillo did steal them (as you say), the assets should go back to their rightful original owners, NOT to just anyone. And if the rightful owners cannot be identified or found, then the assets should go back to "the people" (the state).
If there are private individuals in possession of those assets, and these individuals were NOT the original owners (if any), then they should NOT have those assets...
...whether the assets should go back to the Trujillo family is of course another story.
Read the complete post...they are talking about two different things: (1) the assets, and (2) the record (good things done, not just bad).Those original owners maybe were not too legit either. Otherwise they should be the ones bringing up the subject, ..., when this country still suffers terribly from many vices brought by that regimen, is it money issues we should be worried about setting straight?
Although the government dictated or ruled with an iron fist, its citizens respected one another.
Balaguer continued with Trujillo's agenda, with a Democratic form of government.
You sound as an extremely embittered person...one of those people who unfortunately had a family member who was a regime opponent and paid dearly for it, and now are completely INCAPABLE of having an objective rational discussion on anything related to the Trujillo era.It is half true. The same thing is said in every latin american country, no matter if the president was elected or a dictator. It seems people were more polite and respectful in the past. It has nothing to do with the government... Balaguer hardly had a democratic form of of government. ...
This stupid idiot has been saying the same things for years, just trying to gain political benefit from his lastname. Who cares who stole Trujillo's assets? Trujillo stole them in the first place...