Trying to make sense of the report, which as usual raises more questions than answers:
He pushed her when she was in the fourth month of pregnancy, leading her to give birth prematurely, which caused the death of the foetus six months later
- Did she "give birth" in the fourth month to a foetus that survived 6 months (not possible) or did she give birth some months later, before the pregnancy was full term, in which case it would be difficult to link it directly with the alleged assault.
The story (truthful or not) does make sense.
1) He pushed her.
2) She gave birth a premature baby (in his/her 4th month of development)
3) The premature baby was put in some type of incubator.
4) The baby died 6 months later.
I suppose points 2 to 4 are known FACTS, that can be easily verified.
The only doubt is whether or not (2) was the result from (1).
I have no idea how can a decent person from this short article conclude that (1) did NOT happen or did but didn't lead to (2).
It is gross speculation at best, or biased and stereotyping (if not bigotry) at worst.
Only an analysis of the actual evidence can allow one to conclude whether or not (2) is the result from (1).