You present a false argument. It is called the god of the gaps argument. Because you cannot explain existence through logic and reasoning, you create a creator to explain existence. Try something better the next time like actual proof of your own particular one true god (or gods).
That's correct, I believe in God to explain how everything came into being, if you want to call that the God of the gaps, that's fine by me, He's much more than that.
However, I don't see any difference using a big bang theory, billions years of time, chance and many reasonable and unreasonable assumptions to fill the gap.
Chip made a good point referring to the moral law that seems to be inside all of us. How come you realize that if some innocent 16 year old girl is raped and murdered that's not good? How come you feel that taking what's not yours is not good? How come you think that giving your non-qualified nephew a DOP300,000 / month job in your government department is not correct? How come you actually do know that cheating on your wife or husband is wrong?
Did these moral laws get inside you by chance, by evolution, or because you see other people thinking that's wrong? If that's they case, why are we punishing people who do these things? Or at least think they should be punished? If it's all chance, why can't we let anyone just decide what he does?
If you take some time to think about it, everyone has a notion of moral law, this means that there must be an origin of this law. The difference between good and bad must come from somewhere. or Someone. If there is no such someone, why should you tell me I can't rape, steal, murder, or cheat on my wife? That's just you thinking that's bad, it's not an universal law.
Only people indoctrinated by modern, secular education are able to stick to God-denial even though plain and clear logical thinking shows otherwise. I'm happy to KNOW there is a God.