It is a bit off topic, but let me respond to what Fredo says he has heard about ADECA. In 2009, a team of professionals from the Ministry of Tourism, after many consultations with the public in Cabarete, prepared a land use plan for Cabarete that was approved by presidential decree. The principal purpose of the plan was to foster controlled sustainable growth in Cabarete. It created defined zones throughout Cabarete, with defined density limits and building height limits. The planners took into consideration that wind sports were an important aspect of the tourism economy of Cabarete and they applied known aerodynamic principles regarding the negative impacts of tall buildings on the shoreline on the beach and the wind conditions on and near the shore. Millenium is an example of a development built consistent with those regulations that limited the part closest to the shore to two stories and allowed 3 stories behind that and 4 stories further back.
Traditionally builders could pretty much build whatever they wanted by paying off the Vice Minister of Tourism, but this began to change with the establishment of the plan and regulations. Authority for MITUR permits passed to the technical side of MITUR that based approvals on consistency with the plan. The one legal way to get around this is to get a special presidential decree that overides the regulations for a particular project.
ADECA has supported the MITUR plan for Cabarete as part of a general position supporting the rule of law and reducing corruption in Cabarete. However, there are a few builders that feel that these regulations constrain their opportunities for a quick profit, and it is convenient for them to say that were it not for ADECA more projects would be moving forward. But Millenium I was built consistent with the regulations and looks to be a profitable investment. A number of the sizable projects that have been proposed at one point and have not gone forward, like Fountains or Amber Dunes, can be explained by the fall off in tourism in the area and the resultant questionability of the project in the current environment. The MITUR building regulations are not the reason.