Some threads on DR1 are in a special class and remind me of a novela here in the DR. That is, the people all gather to see the next episode of the adventures of Pedro and his 38 novias. After having watched so many episodes and possibly having acted therein yourself it comes as a complete surprise and possible outrage when the plug is pulled.
We as moderators are given a degree of latitude in the overseeing of the threads. We as moderators are also human and not all alike. It is because of this lack of similarity that you will experience differences in the moderation in the different forums. Robert has established rules that he expects all posters to abide by and the reasons for these rules should be obvious and therefore require no explanation. But even with these rules a degree of latitude is allowed. A prime example of this would be the recent thread in the ?Debates? forum on ?religion? here in the DR. After 8 pages of interaction of board members and 77 posts I posted
this last post and closed the thread.
Regardless of how a moderator should handle their forums I think that post #22 by Chris should be brought to the forefront once again. For those of you that may have missed that post then allow me to remind you of what she said;
?If you have information to add to a closed post, have you tried to pm a mod with your suggestion?
- If you want to talk about something that you are not sure falls within the scope of the board, have you tried to pm a mod with your idea? ?
This is good advice but I as a moderator can say that I can count on one hand the number of times I?ve been contacted by PM with suggestions or questions concerning closed or supposed threads. In the same token I have forgotten the number of PM?s I?ve received after closing a thread or deleting a post to be called almost every name in the book. It is the thought of those idiotic PM?s that I mention something else Chris said in #22, ?- Don't fight with a mod. ?, as the reality of the situation is that you are wasting your time.
Robert and his summations of the workings on this board seem to be apparent to everyone both new and old and should well explain how it does and will operate. Out of the many things that have been communicated by Robert I think the following quote by him sums it all up very well, ?You call it censorship, we call it moderating. You call it freedom of speech, we just laugh and suggest you go find another website?
Rick