Thanks for the pictures, but Labadee is not the real Haiti. Labadee is owned by the cruise lines.
Thanks for the pictures, but Labadee is not the real Haiti. Labadee is owned by the cruise lines.
I was once told that there was a time when Royal Caribbean used to tell its passengers that they arrived to their private "island" called Paradise Island.Royal Caribbean lease a chunk of beach-front land near the village of Labadie. On non-cruise ship days anyone can go into the compound for a fee - 10US$ more or less. Access is denied on cruise ship days, I beleive.
There have been some interesting land ownership issues in the area as Papa Doc leased the land to Royal Caribbean's predecessors without actually consulting the original owners. Recently, telecoms companies have been acquiring sites for their antennas only to find that local landowners have original title deeds. The Cruise company still have a lease agreement with the government and the 2 sides are not at all happy with each other.
Dictators are not always renowned for dotting the i's and crossing the T's.
It turns out that when the ships arrive, the cruise company tell the passengers that they are arriving in the beautiful island of Hispaniola - true enough. They do not tell them they are in Haiti - after all they want them to leave the boat and spend some money.
The tourist are not allowed to leave the compound and explore Haiti at all- shame as there is some truly beautiful unspoiled coastline round there.
Excellent trip report! Thanks for sharing! It's nice to hear it's not necessarily as bad as many Dominicans and others would like to have you think!
I am hoping to do some small trips there in the near future, but was a bit worried about the safety aspect as well.
In my opinion, the main difference between corruption in Haiti and in D.R. (whilst dealing with the Aduana and other government officers) seems to be this -
In Haiti, the corruption is consistent - I pay the same baksheesh for the same thing day in day out.
In Dominican Republic the propina changes day to day depending on how much the recipient thinks he can screw me for.
This makes it very difficult to plan and execute business in he D.R. as compared to Haiti.
I am not judging corruption as being good or bad - it is a fact of life in both countries. It just seems that the Dominicans have no shame when it comes to trying to rip people off.
Besides, it is their country - they can do what they like - good luck to them!
Pardon my curiosity but those who bribe aren't as corrupt as those who take the bribe?
Remember the quote: "Money is truthful. If a man speaks of his honor, make him pay cash." Robert A. Heinlein
Interesting question, Vacara.
If I get stopped by A Dominican police officer in a shakedown and he will either accept 100pesos right there and then or he will take me to the police station and discuss it further - am I corrupt if I decide to pay the 100 pesos and not deal with multiple officers at the jail? - more expensive and not a good outcome for me?
I think not - in this case I am a victim of corruption.
In the same way, when I try to do business in Haiti and Dominican Republic - if I go by the book and insist on absolutely no 'shortcuts' then I will do no work, generate no capital, not win contracts, not hire the staff etc etc... If this makes me the corrupt one - then so be it. I have been dragged down to the Dominican/Haitian level.
I agree that if I am paying corrupt officials then I too am involved, however, I think that the person receiving has a more dodgy ethic than the one paying. At least in all the petty corruption situations I have encountered.
If I were a businessman paying big bribes to win government contracts than, yes, I would be as guilty as the payee. Perhaps the party that tries to initiate the corruption is the one at fault.
Heck,I have seen budgets/cash-flows for projects that have explicitly set aside cash to "ease the flow of business".
What do you think?
Does the particular situation dictate the answer to your situation?
Interesting answer Pedro, it confirms my suspicion that you are not a corrupt person because your corruption is compulsory, born out of neccesity.
- Like the whore who prostitute herself because she has a child in need at home.
- or the drug dealer who sells drugs to supply his family.
- or the cop who stop you and take the money you generously offer him not because he is corrupt but rather cuz the meager salary he almost take home every month.
- or all the corrupt people who are in jail for doing something out of necessity.
You never corrupt people because of your greed, avarice and piggishness Pedro, but because your necessities are more important than those of the rest of us.
Thanks for replying to my question.
Interesting answer Pedro, it confirms my suspicion that you are not a corrupt person because your corruption is compulsory, born out of neccesity.
- Like the whore who prostitute herself because she has a child in need at home.
- or the drug dealer who sells drugs to supply his family.
- or the cop who stop you and take the money you generously offer him not because he is corrupt but rather cuz the meager salary he almost take home every month.
- or all the corrupt people who are in jail for doing something out of necessity.
You never corrupt people because of your greed, avarice and piggishness Pedro, but because your necessities are more important than those of the rest of us.
Thanks for replying to my question.
By your definition Jesus was corrupt too, for he said "give to caesar what is caesar's".
As most people never get to meet "caesar" they have to deal with those who represent "him", so it is up to the person representing "caesar" to do his job correctly and no blame falls on the public who interact with them.