Listen, sock puppet, I have made very specific responses to your idiotic, unsubstantiated posts and just like your previous handle, Joseita, you simply ignore those responses and post bullshit. Debating requires listening. Try it sometime, Joseita. We're still waiting for your responses to our queries. What's the matter? You don't have the cajones to defend your postion?
- Thread starter Porfio_Rubirosa
- Start date
Hippo's Tailor
the conflict is in your head......I'm not here to argue with you, I couldn't care less what you say or think. I post my view on the topics, your childish reaction is your business not mine.......
All you do is go off topic.......so either stay on topic, or as I said, shut your big Yanqui sex tourist mouth.......
All you do is go off topic.......so either stay on topic, or as I said, shut your big Yanqui sex tourist mouth.......
Yea, I don't think its Joseito either. Joseito was sillier, less educated, but also less bitter and hateful. Joseito was a socialist boardering on communist, but if you read Diablo carefully, you'll see that he's not really a communist at all but rather a pure American hater. For example, he has written that all of the Dominican classes should collectively hate Americans since the Americans are responsible for the current situation in the DR and that the Dominican political class is not responsible at all because ... well ... because they're Dominican. Makes sense, huh.
diablorojo said:
There are occasions to be formal and informal. If the king wants to put on a chacabana while visiting the Dominican Republic, that is OK because he is respecting our dress code but when our chopo president is visiting royalty in a royal palace he is required to pay proper respect by dressing accordingly not like the freaking clown suit he's wearing!
By repeating unsubstantiated accusations you are yourself committing the same sin of which you accuse diablorojo, and frankly it is getting just as tiresome. I am REALLY dissapointed, you are too smart for that.[B]XanaduRanch[/B] said:
A funny thread gone to pots.
Pib, and so are you. It doesn't matter who the sock puppet is. He posts political dribble in unrelated threads, and when called on it, very specifically refuses to repsond to the rants that he's been called on, and instead resorts to name calling. Would you like me to repeat the requests for response here? No problem. I have no patience for anyone who throws bs out to see where it will stick and doesn't have the balls to back it up when someone calls him on it no matter whether the sock puppet is Joseita, DialbalRoja, or H.M. himself. Defend what you post. Why should I be asked to 'shut up' when I have posted cogent, intelligent responses to this nonsense and received nothing but sock puppet drivel in response? Please, go back and re-read the posts.
Here's what started this, now please Goddess tell me how I have maligned the poor fool:
What do these comments have to do with music?
Here's what started this, now please Goddess tell me how I have maligned the poor fool:
What do these comments have to do with music?
- The baggy clothes and big white tennis shoes you're laughing at are exports of the very same oppressed black and latino minorities that you keep imagining and harping on. Make up your mind. Which side are you on Communist Devil?
- Marginalized and Oppressed? I dare you to say that to my ex-wife or her inlaws and make it out alive. They are lawyers, doctors, college professors, policemen, even the mayor of Des Moines, Iowa is my ex's first cousin. The only people being marginalized are people unwilling to actually, oh work for a living and stop blaming their problems on the white devils with their boots on their necks. What totally ignorant nonsense.
- The 'U.S' does? What, in fact is the 'U.S.'? Read a bit more. This is not a Cuban-Communist command economy. Ideas that sell, sell, and are sold. And? The most succesful music companies in the United States by far are black-owned, and black-operated selling to the world. But, they are U.S. citizens so I guess you are technically correct. Just ignoring that little fact that it's blacks selling black products, music, and ideas. Hate to let a little thing like the truth get in the way there, though, eh, Communist Devil?
- His music was about as popular as that great keyboard he invented when he wasn't busy writing 'pop' hits.
- You ought to look up the definition of 'whoring'. It fits your posts to a tee. If you don't know what I mean by that, please do the search before spouting again. As to not opening your mouth so much, well, even though I do find your posts amusing, we'll all just have to keep hope alive!
Last edited:
Pib,
I hear you about XR but, in his defense, Diablo has been "baiting". In fact, though Diablo has had some valuable input on some cultural topics, in regard to politics, he seems incapable of anything other than baiting. He's a good little hater and button pusher, but never follows-up with anything of value at all - nothing constructive ever.
But I am resolving to not be baited any more. When XR's hangover wears off in the morning, he can join me in the pledge. You hear that you filthy depraved sex tourist you!
I hear you about XR but, in his defense, Diablo has been "baiting". In fact, though Diablo has had some valuable input on some cultural topics, in regard to politics, he seems incapable of anything other than baiting. He's a good little hater and button pusher, but never follows-up with anything of value at all - nothing constructive ever.
But I am resolving to not be baited any more. When XR's hangover wears off in the morning, he can join me in the pledge. You hear that you filthy depraved sex tourist you!
PF, Is it that obvious I've had a few glasses of wine? LOL! Guess that's better than afew posts of whine!
OK. Good night! Maybe I can clear my reputation in the morning, but I stand by what I've said.
Tom (aka XR)
OK. Good night! Maybe I can clear my reputation in the morning, but I stand by what I've said.
Tom (aka XR)
XR
You will not hear any argument from me if you decide to call diablorojo on his, er, "funny" theories. Heck, I don't have the patience to follow him around arguing his few golden nuggets mixed with a zillion hair-splitting ideas (sort of like the proverbial needle in the haystack). But as I said, I have higher expectations of you. You have proven yourself to be an intelligent, coherent, albeit seemingly sexually perverted poster. I will hold you to higher standards even if you don't like it.
If you have the patience to debate all his ideas (in the same manner that one tries to put an eel on a leash and take it for a walk in the park) I am OK with that, but don't lower your usual standards.
Still friends?
And to go back to the OP. I am not a fashion critic, but Hipo does look silly in that suit. Somebody convinced the emperor that he looked regal in his new lovely clothes
You will not hear any argument from me if you decide to call diablorojo on his, er, "funny" theories. Heck, I don't have the patience to follow him around arguing his few golden nuggets mixed with a zillion hair-splitting ideas (sort of like the proverbial needle in the haystack). But as I said, I have higher expectations of you. You have proven yourself to be an intelligent, coherent, albeit seemingly sexually perverted
poster. I will hold you to higher standards even if you don't like it.If you have the patience to debate all his ideas (in the same manner that one tries to put an eel on a leash and take it for a walk in the park) I am OK with that, but don't lower your usual standards.
Still friends?
And to go back to the OP. I am not a fashion critic, but Hipo does look silly in that suit. Somebody convinced the emperor that he looked regal in his new lovely clothes
Last edited:
Still Friends! For sure!
Although I guess I will have to work on the 'sexually perverted' side of my posts. Apparently that wasn't coming through strongly enough if you're still unsure about it. CCCCCcccccCCcCCcccc I need your help, my mentor!
And to stay on topic, even as a poor sexually frustrated yanqui imperialist oppressor tourist gringo I still dress better going to the beach to knock down a few vinos and rob milk from the mouths of poor Dominican children in the process than His Baldness does in going to the bathroom in his chopo-expense paid castillo in Costanza.
How's that for getting back to DR content, Rob?! Night all!
Although I guess I will have to work on the 'sexually perverted' side of my posts. Apparently that wasn't coming through strongly enough if you're still unsure about it. CCCCCcccccCCcCCcccc I need your help, my mentor!
And to stay on topic, even as a poor sexually frustrated yanqui imperialist oppressor tourist gringo I still dress better going to the beach to knock down a few vinos and rob milk from the mouths of poor Dominican children in the process than His Baldness does in going to the bathroom in his chopo-expense paid castillo in Costanza.
How's that for getting back to DR content, Rob?! Night all!
Re: Hippos pants
There is Chinese saying that a cow is a cow is a cow even if you drag it to Beijing's Forbidden Palace.
Likewise, using your favorite description of HM, un burro es un burro es un burro aunque llega al Palacio Real de Madrid
Golo100 said:
There is Chinese saying that a cow is a cow is a cow even if you drag it to Beijing's Forbidden Palace.
Likewise, using your favorite description of HM, un burro es un burro es un burro aunque llega al Palacio Real de Madrid
diablorojo said:
Is there any form or politician lower than a Populist?
Right! Balaguer had an informal style! So did Trujillo!
AZB,
You miss the point. It's okay to have unconventional beliefs. But if you do, you had better have some good ammunition to use to back them up when challenged by the majority. Diablo almost never does. He hits with a statement like "it's all part of the imperialist American dogs designs to conquer the world", and then disappears when people ask him to provide facts.
You know, an irrationally pro-American perspective is NOT best countered by irrationally anti-American rhetoric. (Ditto irrationally pro-Israel people are not best countered with the latest rants and raves from your favorite "the Mosad actually attacked the World Trade Center" websites.) Rather, it would best be countered with facts and reason. And, guess what, Criss, Texas, Tony, XR and others with conventional beliefs are not always right, but when you're in the minority, your facts and logic had better be better than everyone else's.
You and Diablo certainly have unipolar perspectives. Perhaps it has something to do with self-loathing resulting from the fact that you and Diablo are, at least culturally, more American than anything else.
You miss the point. It's okay to have unconventional beliefs. But if you do, you had better have some good ammunition to use to back them up when challenged by the majority. Diablo almost never does. He hits with a statement like "it's all part of the imperialist American dogs designs to conquer the world", and then disappears when people ask him to provide facts.
You know, an irrationally pro-American perspective is NOT best countered by irrationally anti-American rhetoric. (Ditto irrationally pro-Israel people are not best countered with the latest rants and raves from your favorite "the Mosad actually attacked the World Trade Center" websites.) Rather, it would best be countered with facts and reason. And, guess what, Criss, Texas, Tony, XR and others with conventional beliefs are not always right, but when you're in the minority, your facts and logic had better be better than everyone else's.
You and Diablo certainly have unipolar perspectives. Perhaps it has something to do with self-loathing resulting from the fact that you and Diablo are, at least culturally, more American than anything else.
An Informal Style?
Yes, those whit socks with the high tide pants and black shoes are very informal. Fred Flinstone dressed better on bowling nights. Anyone else think a big blue "Order of the Waterbuffalo" hat might improve His Baldnesses formal attire?
P.S.
AZB, as much as you want this to be about being persecuted for a particular belief, it's not. I know that tends to take the wind out of your sails, and those of DiablaRoja/Joseita, because then you have to argue facts or back up your positions with more than just "I feel" statements. The problem here is that political statements are constantly made in unrelated threads, and then when they are refuted as being baseless point by point, instead of replying to the substance the response back is "Why don't you shut up." How intelligent. If you're going to take those positions, great! I love to debate. I do not like to be spewed at, and that's all that's going on here now.
By the way, I never watch CNN.
Yes, those whit socks with the high tide pants and black shoes are very informal. Fred Flinstone dressed better on bowling nights. Anyone else think a big blue "Order of the Waterbuffalo" hat might improve His Baldnesses formal attire?
P.S.
AZB, as much as you want this to be about being persecuted for a particular belief, it's not. I know that tends to take the wind out of your sails, and those of DiablaRoja/Joseita, because then you have to argue facts or back up your positions with more than just "I feel" statements. The problem here is that political statements are constantly made in unrelated threads, and then when they are refuted as being baseless point by point, instead of replying to the substance the response back is "Why don't you shut up." How intelligent. If you're going to take those positions, great! I love to debate. I do not like to be spewed at, and that's all that's going on here now.
By the way, I never watch CNN.
Porfio, your point is well taken. However you made my point even more concrete: people with the conventional beliefs have their points backed by the mainstream media (CNN etc). They don't have to seek out any sources its all there on the media, thats how their minds / beliefs are molded in the first place. Now here comes a person who reads between the lines and his sources are not the mainstream media, thus, we are wrong and made fool out of in forum.
Ex: Reading between the lines:
There was a recent news break all over media about a british (indian decent) business man who was arrested by the FBI for buying and supplying rocket launchers to shoot down commercial airliners. The critics called him a stupid, naieve smuggler of arms who had no idea what he was getting into, but no one called him a terrorist or even connected him with al-queda. I was shocked to see that there was no correlation made between him and the major terrorist groups. Then I read on and saw exactly what it was all about.
He was an indian decent hindu (the big fish or the front man in the bust), Then there was an associate who was a muslim (still no mention or connection with the terrorist groups). Still wondering why? wait.
Then the 3rd guy was the key but his name was not mentioned anywhere or will be ,mentioned anytime soon in the mainstream media. He was a diamond merchant, an american jew from NYC. Yes, an american jew who was involved in money laundering for the men who were arrested in buying and supplying rocket launchers to shoot down american commercial planes. His name and his profile was totally blacked out from the media. He was also arrested and already set bail by his jewish lawyer. This is the reason no terrorist label was given to the indian and the muslim arrested suspects. I mean if they were asscociated with terrorists then the 3rd man was also part of it.
Now how many people actually believe they were buying those arms to shoot down wild turkeys?
This is only one example.
Ex: Reading between the lines:
There was a recent news break all over media about a british (indian decent) business man who was arrested by the FBI for buying and supplying rocket launchers to shoot down commercial airliners. The critics called him a stupid, naieve smuggler of arms who had no idea what he was getting into, but no one called him a terrorist or even connected him with al-queda. I was shocked to see that there was no correlation made between him and the major terrorist groups. Then I read on and saw exactly what it was all about.
He was an indian decent hindu (the big fish or the front man in the bust), Then there was an associate who was a muslim (still no mention or connection with the terrorist groups). Still wondering why? wait.
Then the 3rd guy was the key but his name was not mentioned anywhere or will be ,mentioned anytime soon in the mainstream media. He was a diamond merchant, an american jew from NYC. Yes, an american jew who was involved in money laundering for the men who were arrested in buying and supplying rocket launchers to shoot down american commercial planes. His name and his profile was totally blacked out from the media. He was also arrested and already set bail by his jewish lawyer. This is the reason no terrorist label was given to the indian and the muslim arrested suspects. I mean if they were asscociated with terrorists then the 3rd man was also part of it.
Now how many people actually believe they were buying those arms to shoot down wild turkeys?
This is only one example.
Boy are you confused. CNN is not mainstream media. It is not mainstream public opinion. The views of CNN are much closer to DiablaRoja/Joseita's positions than mine. Next time I see you type that I am going to throw a brick through my monitor and I hope it lands right on your keyboard.
And, once again AZB, why if he's so clever at reading between the lines and gleaning knowledge that's past the rest of us conformists by (and if you knew me better that is not a label you'd apply to me and I resent it), why is it so difficult to site a few facts for us all when his positions are refuted to elighten the great unwashed masses? That's all we're asking here! Because he can't, that's why.
And, once again AZB, why if he's so clever at reading between the lines and gleaning knowledge that's past the rest of us conformists by (and if you knew me better that is not a label you'd apply to me and I resent it), why is it so difficult to site a few facts for us all when his positions are refuted to elighten the great unwashed masses? That's all we're asking here! Because he can't, that's why.
Yes, but your take on the story also omits facts, jumps to conclusions and is an example of being unipolar in the opposite direction. Obviously, we can't debate this topic here, but I suggest you read ALL of the news coverage on that event.