North or South coast?

A

Axelle

Guest
After have seen some pictures, I've the feeling that I would prefer the North cost because of his lushy vegetation, his scenery... but I fear the North coast is too wet (rainy)in the end of october compared to the South Coast... what do you think?
 
M

martin

Guest
Axelle...

Try living here in the"UK"
We never get a chance to predict the weather throughout any month it's just normally cold and rains most of the time!!!!!!

Reguards Martin.....
 
G

Grahame Bush

Guest
Before coming to live here I checked rainfall quotas for the country via the DR Consulate in London who sent me the official rainfall statistics for the whole country. This showed approx 3 times as much rain in the south as we have up here in Puerto Plata. I WISH it would rain a bit more here, (sorry Martin, being from England myself I KNOW what you mean & it is sacrilidge for a Brit to ask for more rain!!), as my garden is in desperate need of rainfall. So is the Golf Course!! Playing the greens at the moment is a lottery as there is so little green grass on them!!

So, in answer to your question - go north young man!!

Best regards - Grahame Bush.
 
S

Susanne

Guest
Quite agree. Yes, it could be wet, but it will not last long. We had a holiday there during one of the wettest time people could remember and still came home with a nice tan.

There is a lot more to do and to see in the North. Don't worry about the rain - it is actually pleasant.

Regards,
Susanne
 
P

PITA

Guest
No doubt NORTH! Nowhere rivals it in variety of beauty!! But depends on what YOU like to do, see... whatever, be sure you go to the Samana Peninsula if only to take a "side and see"...
Bring some extra breathe with you because the place will take yours away!
pita(aiki)
 
A

Abe

Guest
Playa Grande Beach.

I went to Playa Grande (Rio San Juan), that's located in the North Coast of the DR, between Puerto Planta and Samana (please confirm), the scenery is just beautiful, the vegetation in this region is out of this world, I am Dominican and even so I as amazed to see this much green, the trees around the Hotel are HUGE and beautiful, you don't get to see that in the South.

Playa Grande beach is one of the most beautiful beaches I?ve seen in the DR and I have seen a quite a few. The Playa Grande Hotel, is locate around a 6 mile long and 0.5 mile wide (so we were told) golf field (sorry I don?t know how to say it english) anyway, being in the club house and seen the scenery made me feel like I was in Florida or some pricey Bervelly Hills place only reserved for the rich ones. I like the area where the ?Playa Grande? Hotel is located, but, I can?t really suggest you go to this hotel, go to ?Bahia Principe? hotel instead.

The South Coast is more tropical like, hot as hell and several times drier, the vegetation is not as lushly as the north, I think it's because the north has not being hit by hurricanes as many times as the south has, but If you are going to the South, go Hotels that are located east of Suan Dolio, I am talking about San Pedro de Macoris La Romana, Higuey, there are a hand full of acceptable hotels in Juan Dolio but I don't recommend any of them.
 
S

Sophie

Guest
Re: Playa Grande Beach.

hi!
I just wanted to tell you I've been five times to the D.R. and thus, I've seen every part of it : north AND south.
I'd never go back to the north coast...maybe to live but never for holydays...
The south coast is very better for your holydays, believe me...
Better choose Boca Chica or Punta cana...the two best places I've never seen...
 
S

Sophie

Guest
Re: Playa Grande Beach.

one more thing, the year I went to Puerto Plata,it rained for about a week long on the three weeks I spent there...I never had that in the south...just one or two days rain at more...
 
M

Marc

Guest
Re: Playa Grande Beach.

The south coast may have been better for you, that does not make it "better". You came to Puerto Plata (first mistake) once and have made a judgement based on that.

Punta Cana? Please. Leave the resort and you are in the flat wastelands of the island. Want to go for supper? Hmmmmm...Higuey? NOT! Punta Cana is a hot spot because people go there and stay on the beach in their resorts. If that is what you like, then you are in for a treat, because yes, it is the best place on the island for that.

Boca Chica, only drove through it once, so I cannot really comment on it. I have read all kinds of different things about it, but close friends of mine here prefer the north in a heartbeat.

Maimon, Cofresi, Sosua, Cabarete, Rio San Juan, Playa Grande, Las Terrenas, Las Galeras... on and on and on...with hundreds of "off the beaten path" beaches in between. Mountains, lush vegetation everywhere, windsurfing, kite surfing, surfing, boogie boarding, fishing...The south doesn't hold a candle to what we have on the north coast!

North Coast kicks ass!
marc
 
J

Jim Hinsch

Guest
Re: south coast much nicer than the north coast

Yes, Punta Cana and Boca Chica are known for being the two most beautiful beaches in the Dominican Republic and rare gems of the Caribbean.

It is a well known fact that the south coast has the nicest beaches in the Dominican Republic (some say in the entire Caribbean).

Boca Chica Beach
<a href="http://www.BocaChicaBeach.net"><img border="2" SRC="http://www.BocaChicaBeach.net/images/beach\beach1.jpg"></a>
Click Here for Boca Chica Information

Punta Cana Beach
<a href="http://www.mastercomputergroup.com/images/more_of_the_beach1.jpg"><img border="2" SRC="http://www.mastercomputergroup.com/images/more_of_the_beach1_small.jpg"></a>
Click Here for a larger view of the beach at Punta Cana
 
M

Marc

Guest
Re: Rare Gem

Is that a rare gem of a power plant spewing soot, SOx and NOx into the atmosphere that they get to stare at while swimming on the beach? hehehe. Betcha there are rare gem barges that bring the crude oil/distillate to this plant also ;)

Yes, the white sand of the south coast is nice. So if you want somewhere to go and lay on white sand for 14 days in a row, go south.

marc
 
H

hillbilly

Guest
The vote is for North over South. However,

What you want to do is also important.
The North offers down-to-earth fun and games.
The South (especially that part nearest Santo Domingo) is, quit frankly, trashy. I know Jim will jump on me for saying this, but it is how I see it and how most people here (that is "most" of the nicer people)
As you get further from Santo Domingo the nicer the class of people becomes. The furtherest part-Bavaro and Punta Cana are very exclusive and georgeous resorts. Liz, Oscar, Julio and Henry all just adore the place!! It is Bludhorn's legacy to the D.R.
I'd say, since you asked, that the North is a good place to start..with a bit more variety in side trips, and a big edge on being with the people-if you get out a bit.

HB
 
N

Natasha

Guest
Re: listen to Hillbilly

Hillbilly has given you the best advise here. For what is worth, since I have been to both coasts, I have always preferred the warm, clear and white sand beaches of the south coast (Caribbean Sea). As a person born in a southern province, the south coast beaches were no match to the Puerto Plata area (Atlantic) beaches. However, the south coast is unfortunately not designed in the way Hillbilly describes the north coast. Boca Chica is indeed a gem of a beach, but I wouldn't be caught dead there. 20, 25 years ago...that was another story. The farther east you go from Boca Chica and Juan Dolio, the nicer it gets - particularly quaint is the little village of Bayahibe.

In the north (well sort of) my vote is for Samana. Go to Las Terrenas or Las Galeras. Go to the actual town of Samana. Visit Rincon Beach, now THAT is a true gem of a beach and Conde Nast Traveller seems to also agree.

Regards, Natasha
 
E

ECH, MD.

Guest
Bobby Lee turned in his grave!!!

Oh Hell Hillbilly......
You are referring to the North Shore and the South of the DR.
And I was about to have you shot for desertion....You know, "them"...damn Yankees and "us" good ole boys (from the South). CHEERS/ECH
 
D

Drake

Guest
Re: Playa Grande Beach.

You should have seen it 25 years ago when you could only get there by a dirt road. My family and I would camp there enjoying a true paradise.... que sue?o perdido..
 
E

Eddy

Guest
Re: The vote is for North over South. However,

So is mine. More and more tourists from Boca Chica etc. are now travelling to the North. The south does have something and is certainly worth a visit, but it's not the place a person would go back to year after year. (Unless your into the major resource of Boca Chica ie. Hookers). You can visit the whole south on one vacation but it will take you years to visit the north. I'm of course refering to beach tourism. Santo Domingo is a different story. It offers things you can't find anywhere else.
 
T

Tgf

Guest
Re: Bobby Lee turned in his grave!!!

Don't want to revive the "War between the States" or the "Rebellion" as the Yankees called it, but aren't you from Kentucky ECH and isn't Hillbilly from West Virginia? If my history serves me, the West Virginians seceded from Virginia (1861) because they did not agree with the sucession and Kentucky
remained firmly in the control of the Federal government during the Civil War even though a large number of citizens were sympathetic to the Southern cause. You might be 'copperheads' but your States were in the Union and allied to the Federal government during those years of turmoil.

Regards from a Yankee (by accident of birth) who lived many years in the South.
 
J

Jim Hinsch

Guest
Re: The vote is for North over South. South!

Most people that have been to both the north and south, don't return to the north (me included!). I know you live on the north coast so the truth hurts.

The northern beaches just don't compare to the beaches of the south and the northern resorts are mostly budget. That's why the south continues to grow while the north struggles. The north is rather scummy in comparison, especially Puerto Plata.

The south is more expensive, yes. That's where vacationers with money go. That's where the nicest resorts and the finest beaches are.

The north is best for retired foreigners that aren't into the beach much and are on a lower budget, and for the backpacker types and the hooker seekers (there are more hookers on the north coast, especially Puerto Plata and Sosua and in between).

The north coast is well known for its budget vacationers. And of course the Playa Dorada discos are well known for the male hookers, as are the water sports guys all across the north coast.

Eddy: "You can visit the whole south on one vacation but it will take you years to visit the north."

It's the other way around. You could visit all the resorts on the north coast in one vacation (I mostly did), but it would take years to visit all the places across the south coast (in many trips, I still haven't been to them all and new resorts are being built to satisfy the growing demand).

And of course, Santo Domingo is on the south coast, 45 minutes from Boca Chica. There, you'll find hundreds of nice places to eat, drink, and shop. Nice shopping malls that compare to the malls in the USA, complete with food courts and movie theatres (movies are in English). Plaza Central is beautiful these days, with its outdoor strip of bar kiosks, music, sculptures, and fountains.

Some of the south coast's finest:

Boca Chica
beach1.jpg

playa_vista_sea_view.jpg


Punta Cana
more_of_the_beach1.jpg
 
E

Eddy

Guest
Re: The vote is for North over South.

I did say Santo Domingo was something special. I love to go there and there is a lot to visit and a lot of interesting thing to do. As for the hookers, give me a break. You must agree that most come from the south and Boca Chica is a lot closer than Sosua. The ones we have here (Yes this is a couple of discos that tolerate them) are mostly Boca Chica regulars and come up here when it gets to hot for them. Just this week, some people I know went to Boca Chica for a couple of day and said they where everywhere. I've been to Boca Chica beach and it doesn't even come close to Sosua Beach. It's more like a wading pool. I'm not knocking the south coast but you can't compare the south coast beaches to the north. We could sit here for the next 10 years and argue on this. Let's let the other contributors' give us their imput.
 
E

ECH, MD.

Guest
LONG AND BORING REPLY!!!

LONG AND BORING TO MOST........SORRY. BUT I DO LIKE HISTORY.For the most part your history is correct but needs a little polish. If you will permit me..... and don?t apologize for being a yankee....somebody had to be born up North. LOL

As a matter of fact (and interest but otherwise pure junk for most others) in EASTERN KENTUCKY Floyd County and its neighbor to the North, Johnson County were split over the War Between the States! My OWN family was split along with their Church which was also split. Their politics were split, Johnson County was Republican and Floyd Democrat. There was a battle (really a minor skirmish) with Colonel Garfield (later General and then President) in command of the Union. And General Humphrey Marshall in command of the Confederate forces***. Must not have been much as there is a solitary confederate grave along U.S. 23 that has been maintained by the DAR (of all people) for decades.

November 18, 1861 -- A Sovereignty Convention meets in Russellville and establishes the Provisional Government of Kentucky. George W. Johnson is elected the governor.
December 10,1861 - KENTUCKY IS ADMITTED INTO THE CONFEDERATE STATES OF AMERICA BY VOTE OF THE CONFEDERATE CONGRESS.
1862
***January 10 - Battle of Middle Creek fought between forces under Union Colonel James A. Garfield and Gen. Humphrey Marshall.
Upon the outbreak of the American Civil War, Kentucky attempted to maintain a position of neutrality, but the geographical position of the state made the plan impossible. THE GOVERNOR REJECTED THE APPEAL OF ABRAHAM LINCOLN FOR TROOPS, AND WHEN THE CONFEDERATE AND UNION ARMIES BEGAN TO POUR INTO THE STATE FROM OPPOSITE DIRECTIONS, FORMAL DEMANDS WERE MADE FOR THEIR WITHDRAWAL. The Union armies soon TOOK POSSESSION, however, and by 1862 the Confederate forces had evacuated the state. Important military operations in Kentucky were the battles of Mill Springs, Richmond, and Perryville; the invasion of Gen. Braxton Bragg; the five successive cavalry raids of the Confederate general John Morgan (1825?64); and the Confederate raid on Paducah under Gen. Nathan Forrest. Including the so-called Home Guards and those who enlisted but were never mustered in, Kentucky furnished more than 90,000 troops to the Union army and 40,000 to the Confederacy. Throughout the war Kentucky remained a slave state; its slaves were freed only after the adoption (1865) of the 13th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.
Western Virginia became an arena of Indian warfare as the Shawnee of nearby Ohio tried to stem the advance of white settlers. This struggle disrupted, but did not halt, the process of settlement between 1750 and 1790. As western Virginia matured during the next 50 years, IT DIFFERED IN IMPORTANT RESPECTS FROM EASTERN VIRGINIA. It was a poorer but freer society, characterized more by subsistence farms than by large plantations. Iron and glass manufacturing developed early in the Wheeling district, while in the Kanawha and Monongahela valleys salt and iron making presaged the later importance of extractive industries. THESE ECONOMIC DIFFERENCES ADDED TO THE POLITICAL RESTIVENESS WESTERNERS FELT UNDER VIRGINIA?S OLIGARCHICAL AND CONSERVATIVE POLITICAL SYSTEM. (Emphasis mine)

Eastern and western Virginia MIGHT HAVE WORKED OUT THEIR DIFFERENCES AMICABLY, AS THEY APPEARED TO BE DOING IN THE 1850S, HAD IT NOT BEEN FOR THE AMERICAN CIVIL WAR. Instead, Unionist outrage at Virginia?s secession and swift Union military conquests in June?July 1861 encouraged separatist leaders to organize, first, a so-called restored Virginia government based in Wheeling, followed by a separate state government that entered the Union as West Virginia ON JUNE 20, 1863. WELL INTO THE WAR. For strategic and economic reasons, the creators of the state took in the Greenbrier and Potomac regions along the present Virginia border. This gave West Virginia A LARGE Confederate minority, to which a number of disenchanted Unionists were added after 1865. THESE DISSIDENTS GAINED POLITICAL CONTROL OF THE STATE IN THE ELECTIONS OF 1870 AND REMODELED ITS INSTITUTIONS ACCORDING TO VIRGINIA PRECEDENTS.
West Virginia provided to the Union Army 31,872 regular army troops, 133 sailors and marines, and 196 United States Colored Troops, during that terrible conflict of 1861-1865. It is also estimated that somewhere between 16,000 and 20,000 men served in the Confederate Army in this war of "brother versus brother."