All the points are true but when you research the application of the discriminating factors to brand a food "Organic" you'll be lucky to spot a single one of them or absence in some cases.
In the US for example most guidelines used to brand food/meats as Organic seldom fit the bill as you presented atop. Yet they are granted the label just by meting the minimum set of standards required for such certification.
Again you apply the requirements and guidelines of individual producers and breeders in the DR alongside that of major farms and operations. Small breeders and producers as known have very little incentive of money to employ chemical/enhancers/feeds/etc... As their income is restricted to what lives in their pockets.
5th graded corn is just that, corn that is not even fit for use in canning or additives because it can't or will cost too much to process to sterilize as required for industrial applications. Yet they're perfect to feed at low cost. The only thing that makes them so low rated is that size, color, texture and quality makes it impossible to adapt cost effectively for anything else other than filler for other stuff and as low graded food for animals.
This being said, your point is not any weaker or mine any stronger on the matter, as guidelines and requirements are constantly changed or tweaked to producer's needs to fit the bill for labeling...
I have yet to find a single study suggesting that a diet of worms is not any better than the high graded feeds that most of the poultry industry utilizes nowadays.
Organic food/meats if anything can be a tricky term to case into specific parameters given the disparate and often changing guidelines used by the certifying bodies of each country/region/market.
If one thing can be said is that the DR having had the poverty and low funding or benefits from government subsidy in the past, has more of an advantage since the soil is still mostly free from the chemicals and pesticides used for so long in fertile soils in the US and EU at large. The use of indicators to turn back loads of produce or meats from Dominican exporters is used to also protect the market from the flooding of goods against local growers. It's a well known fact that shipping containers and whole ships are tainted with many residual chemicals that impregnate the walls of such things and contaminate whole loads due to air and temperature producing condensation that ultimately taints the goods being carried.
The US FDA is not looking out for the best interest of the people but local industry mind you. Just as the Dominican, Russian, UK, etc... Do too.
But like I said neither one can be 100% right or 100% wrong, just a balanced opinion that we both given the information and knowledge acquired produced.