E
engineerfg
Guest
Hi There,
I've been to Haiti too, and being there isn't going to change 3 simple facts:
1. 'This' money may be donated - yes I agree. But it's a spit in the bucket compared to all of Haiti's working capital which the majority of which is debt. In fact the world bank debt total since day one exceeds 3 billion. Over 2 billion of which has been 'forgiven' now thanks to politicking. But if you count carefully, the interest paid on the debt has come from 'this' type of money -- if it were not for foreign aid, the interest payments on the debt could not be serviced. The interest payments on the debt (which at present stands at about a billion), have in fact repaid the majority of the 'canceled' debt. If you think I"m making this up, I encourage you to go to the world bank website, it's all documented, you can see an annual report and balance sheet for haiti's different restructuring loans all consolidated. You can do the historical math yourself...
2. After you follow step 2, you will then realize that much like the sub-prime loan scam, the indebtedness of haiti is by design. And that yes, 'this' money may be donated, but the donated money helps pay the interest on the debt that really pay for the majority of the capital infrastructure projects.
3. And finally I agree -- Haiti doesn't have the human capital to undertake these projects on it's own. Which is actually an interesting talking point. If you were the president of haiti, which path would you undertake:
1. Bring in the foreign firms, have real RFP's, negotiate the best price, and ensure all contracts have a 'haiti first' approach - where possible locals are employed, where possible locals are TRAINED for future development, or where possible all ventures are undertaken with a local joint venture partner (this is what China did for 50 years to get 'up to speed'); OR
2. bring in the foreign firms, let all the profit, human skills, and value from the contracts remain in the foreign firms, and pay an inflated price - let's be honest, bectel et al don't get haiti a 'good' rate, it's always marked up to ensure profitability and yes there are still near cost-plus projects going on always.
If you do your research, you will understand that one of the biggest criticisms of Aristide - what was called corruption - was that he wanted the biggest infrastructure project - water purification - to go through the route described in #1 above, and not #2.
I've been to Haiti too, and being there isn't going to change 3 simple facts:
1. 'This' money may be donated - yes I agree. But it's a spit in the bucket compared to all of Haiti's working capital which the majority of which is debt. In fact the world bank debt total since day one exceeds 3 billion. Over 2 billion of which has been 'forgiven' now thanks to politicking. But if you count carefully, the interest paid on the debt has come from 'this' type of money -- if it were not for foreign aid, the interest payments on the debt could not be serviced. The interest payments on the debt (which at present stands at about a billion), have in fact repaid the majority of the 'canceled' debt. If you think I"m making this up, I encourage you to go to the world bank website, it's all documented, you can see an annual report and balance sheet for haiti's different restructuring loans all consolidated. You can do the historical math yourself...
2. After you follow step 2, you will then realize that much like the sub-prime loan scam, the indebtedness of haiti is by design. And that yes, 'this' money may be donated, but the donated money helps pay the interest on the debt that really pay for the majority of the capital infrastructure projects.
3. And finally I agree -- Haiti doesn't have the human capital to undertake these projects on it's own. Which is actually an interesting talking point. If you were the president of haiti, which path would you undertake:
1. Bring in the foreign firms, have real RFP's, negotiate the best price, and ensure all contracts have a 'haiti first' approach - where possible locals are employed, where possible locals are TRAINED for future development, or where possible all ventures are undertaken with a local joint venture partner (this is what China did for 50 years to get 'up to speed'); OR
2. bring in the foreign firms, let all the profit, human skills, and value from the contracts remain in the foreign firms, and pay an inflated price - let's be honest, bectel et al don't get haiti a 'good' rate, it's always marked up to ensure profitability and yes there are still near cost-plus projects going on always.
If you do your research, you will understand that one of the biggest criticisms of Aristide - what was called corruption - was that he wanted the biggest infrastructure project - water purification - to go through the route described in #1 above, and not #2.