Its called "Driving the Topic" meaning taking a topic and driving the discussion into variable topics without completely going off tangent, which I beleive i'm not unless I start talking about football. I try not to get tunnel vision within these topics since they start to get boring and the topic starts to have no direction and dies.
As too your other question. I don't entertain interogative approaches that you appear to be doing. I just enjoy simple and lively debates. I'm not writing a research paper so if you choose to disagree so be it. The berdon of proof is on you not me. If you disagree with me, I'm not going to cry about it and beg you for proof.
I can easily make up a story and say I lived in 1 other country or 30 countries, but what good would that do, you could not prove I told you or not told you the truth and you would naturally disagree with me anyway, so why waste my time. So I think just a debate and discussion on the topic and subtopcs should be healthy enough with agreements and disagreements.
As too your other question. I don't entertain interogative approaches that you appear to be doing. I just enjoy simple and lively debates. I'm not writing a research paper so if you choose to disagree so be it. The berdon of proof is on you not me. If you disagree with me, I'm not going to cry about it and beg you for proof.
I can easily make up a story and say I lived in 1 other country or 30 countries, but what good would that do, you could not prove I told you or not told you the truth and you would naturally disagree with me anyway, so why waste my time. So I think just a debate and discussion on the topic and subtopcs should be healthy enough with agreements and disagreements.